老年人齿状突骨折的治疗。

Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-15 DOI:10.1007/s00113-024-01522-1
Andreas Sommer, Lukas Klein, Peter Obid
{"title":"老年人齿状突骨折的治疗。","authors":"Andreas Sommer, Lukas Klein, Peter Obid","doi":"10.1007/s00113-024-01522-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The treatment of odontoid fractures in geriatric patients, particularly type II fractures, remains controversial. In biologically young patients, studies suggest advantages of surgical treatment in terms of mortality; however, this advantage is not observed in geriatric patients. While the mortality appears to be higher after conservative treatment in patients aged 65-80 years, there are studies that have shown no differences in mortality for patients aged 80 years or older and even showed advantages of conservative treatment in this age group. The complication rates of both surgical and conservative approaches are comparable. Although conservative treatment is associated with a higher rate of pseudarthrosis, healing in a \"rigid\" pseudarthrosis is associated with a good clinical outcome and can therefore be considered a treatment success. The central problem with the currently available literature, including the present prospective but nonrandomized data, is selection bias, which significantly limits the comparability of the patient cohorts. So far, no clear superiority of either treatment method has been demonstrated. Therefore, conservative treatment retains its importance in the geriatric patient population and the majority of these patients achieve a very good functional outcome with conservative treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":75280,"journal":{"name":"Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)","volume":" ","pages":"81-86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Treatment of geriatric odontoid fractures].\",\"authors\":\"Andreas Sommer, Lukas Klein, Peter Obid\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00113-024-01522-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The treatment of odontoid fractures in geriatric patients, particularly type II fractures, remains controversial. In biologically young patients, studies suggest advantages of surgical treatment in terms of mortality; however, this advantage is not observed in geriatric patients. While the mortality appears to be higher after conservative treatment in patients aged 65-80 years, there are studies that have shown no differences in mortality for patients aged 80 years or older and even showed advantages of conservative treatment in this age group. The complication rates of both surgical and conservative approaches are comparable. Although conservative treatment is associated with a higher rate of pseudarthrosis, healing in a \\\"rigid\\\" pseudarthrosis is associated with a good clinical outcome and can therefore be considered a treatment success. The central problem with the currently available literature, including the present prospective but nonrandomized data, is selection bias, which significantly limits the comparability of the patient cohorts. So far, no clear superiority of either treatment method has been demonstrated. Therefore, conservative treatment retains its importance in the geriatric patient population and the majority of these patients achieve a very good functional outcome with conservative treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75280,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"81-86\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-024-01522-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-024-01522-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

老年患者齿状突骨折的治疗,特别是II型骨折,仍然存在争议。在生物学上年轻的患者中,研究表明手术治疗在死亡率方面具有优势;然而,在老年患者中没有观察到这种优势。65-80岁患者保守治疗后的死亡率似乎更高,但有研究表明,80岁及以上患者的死亡率没有差异,甚至显示出保守治疗在该年龄组的优势。手术入路和保守入路的并发症发生率相当。尽管保守治疗与较高的假关节发生率相关,但“刚性”假关节的愈合与良好的临床结果相关,因此可以认为是治疗成功。现有文献(包括前瞻性但非随机数据)的中心问题是选择偏倚,这极大地限制了患者队列的可比性。到目前为止,没有任何一种治疗方法有明显的优越性。因此,保守治疗在老年患者群体中仍然很重要,大多数患者通过保守治疗获得了非常好的功能结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Treatment of geriatric odontoid fractures].

The treatment of odontoid fractures in geriatric patients, particularly type II fractures, remains controversial. In biologically young patients, studies suggest advantages of surgical treatment in terms of mortality; however, this advantage is not observed in geriatric patients. While the mortality appears to be higher after conservative treatment in patients aged 65-80 years, there are studies that have shown no differences in mortality for patients aged 80 years or older and even showed advantages of conservative treatment in this age group. The complication rates of both surgical and conservative approaches are comparable. Although conservative treatment is associated with a higher rate of pseudarthrosis, healing in a "rigid" pseudarthrosis is associated with a good clinical outcome and can therefore be considered a treatment success. The central problem with the currently available literature, including the present prospective but nonrandomized data, is selection bias, which significantly limits the comparability of the patient cohorts. So far, no clear superiority of either treatment method has been demonstrated. Therefore, conservative treatment retains its importance in the geriatric patient population and the majority of these patients achieve a very good functional outcome with conservative treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信