补充和综合健康在暴食症中的应用:暴食症专家观点的横截面混合方法研究。

Brenna Bray, Amanda J Shallcross, Adam Sadowski, Morgan Schneller, Katherine Bray, Chris Bray, Heather Zwickey
{"title":"补充和综合健康在暴食症中的应用:暴食症专家观点的横截面混合方法研究。","authors":"Brenna Bray, Amanda J Shallcross, Adam Sadowski, Morgan Schneller, Katherine Bray, Chris Bray, Heather Zwickey","doi":"10.29011/2688-9501.101549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Binge Eating Disorder (BED) has high lifetime prevalence rates, low treatment success rates, and high rates of treatment dissatisfaction, early discontinuation of care, and recurrence. Complementary and integrative health (CIH) interventions (non-mainstream practices used with conventional approaches for whole-person treatment) hold potential to overcome many treatment barriers and improve BED treatment outcomes. Some CIH interventions have empirical support for use in eating disorders. However, little is known about the current state of CIH use in BED.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This mixed-methods cross-sectional study collected information from BED experts about CIH use in adult BED treatment. Fourteen expert BED researchers and clinicians were identified based on federal funding, PubMed-indexed publications, practice in the field, leadership in professional societies, and/or popular press distinction. Anonymously recorded semi-structured interviews were analyzed by ≥2 investigators using reflexive thematic analysis and quantification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Expert opinions and experiences on/with CIH use were generally positive/supportive (64%) with mixed views (36%) varying by intervention and empirical support. The interventions most commonly described were mindfulness (71%), yoga (64%), and supplements/vitamins/pre-/probiotics/herbs (64%). Supplements/vitamins/pre-/probiotics/herbs had mixed views; all other interventions were generally viewed positively. The benefits most commonly associated with specific interventions (e.g., mindfulness, yoga, supplements) were: regulating/tolerating emotions/mood/stress/anxiety (50%); healing the relationship with the body/body image/movement/exercise-trauma (29%); biological/physiological benefits (29%); and directly supporting treatment (\"space for self-separate from treatment,\" behavior change, \"tolerating treatment\") (29%). Intrinsic self-healing (e.g., patient-driven healing that comes from the patient's innate desire to heal based on the patient's lived experience(s)) and investigative research were also associated with CIH use broadly. Most experts (57%) expressed familiarity with existing literature/research for ≥1 CIH intervention; 50% identified a need for empirical testing. Half (50%) spontaneously described using ≥1 CIH intervention in their own clinical practice/center. The most used interventions were yoga (43%), meditation/mindfulness (29%), and acupuncture (21%). Eight experts (57%) endorsed the importance of correct implementation; 43% acknowledged CIH use in conventional treatments (2nd-wave CBT, 3rd-wave behavior therapies).</p><p><strong>Discussion & conclusions: </strong>CIH interventions can complement current BED treatments to improve clinical outcomes, particularly managing anxiety/stress/mood, healing the relationship with the body, addressing biological/physiological deficiencies, and tolerating treatment (thus reducing treatment dropout). Empirical testing is warranted with a particular need for randomized controlled trials and guidelines on implementation and use.</p>","PeriodicalId":73461,"journal":{"name":"International journal of nursing and health care research","volume":"7 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11737546/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Complementary and Integrative Health Use in Binge Eating Disorder: A Cross-Sectional Mixed-Methods Study of Binge Eating Disorder Experts' Perspectives.\",\"authors\":\"Brenna Bray, Amanda J Shallcross, Adam Sadowski, Morgan Schneller, Katherine Bray, Chris Bray, Heather Zwickey\",\"doi\":\"10.29011/2688-9501.101549\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Binge Eating Disorder (BED) has high lifetime prevalence rates, low treatment success rates, and high rates of treatment dissatisfaction, early discontinuation of care, and recurrence. Complementary and integrative health (CIH) interventions (non-mainstream practices used with conventional approaches for whole-person treatment) hold potential to overcome many treatment barriers and improve BED treatment outcomes. Some CIH interventions have empirical support for use in eating disorders. However, little is known about the current state of CIH use in BED.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This mixed-methods cross-sectional study collected information from BED experts about CIH use in adult BED treatment. Fourteen expert BED researchers and clinicians were identified based on federal funding, PubMed-indexed publications, practice in the field, leadership in professional societies, and/or popular press distinction. Anonymously recorded semi-structured interviews were analyzed by ≥2 investigators using reflexive thematic analysis and quantification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Expert opinions and experiences on/with CIH use were generally positive/supportive (64%) with mixed views (36%) varying by intervention and empirical support. The interventions most commonly described were mindfulness (71%), yoga (64%), and supplements/vitamins/pre-/probiotics/herbs (64%). Supplements/vitamins/pre-/probiotics/herbs had mixed views; all other interventions were generally viewed positively. The benefits most commonly associated with specific interventions (e.g., mindfulness, yoga, supplements) were: regulating/tolerating emotions/mood/stress/anxiety (50%); healing the relationship with the body/body image/movement/exercise-trauma (29%); biological/physiological benefits (29%); and directly supporting treatment (\\\"space for self-separate from treatment,\\\" behavior change, \\\"tolerating treatment\\\") (29%). Intrinsic self-healing (e.g., patient-driven healing that comes from the patient's innate desire to heal based on the patient's lived experience(s)) and investigative research were also associated with CIH use broadly. Most experts (57%) expressed familiarity with existing literature/research for ≥1 CIH intervention; 50% identified a need for empirical testing. Half (50%) spontaneously described using ≥1 CIH intervention in their own clinical practice/center. The most used interventions were yoga (43%), meditation/mindfulness (29%), and acupuncture (21%). Eight experts (57%) endorsed the importance of correct implementation; 43% acknowledged CIH use in conventional treatments (2nd-wave CBT, 3rd-wave behavior therapies).</p><p><strong>Discussion & conclusions: </strong>CIH interventions can complement current BED treatments to improve clinical outcomes, particularly managing anxiety/stress/mood, healing the relationship with the body, addressing biological/physiological deficiencies, and tolerating treatment (thus reducing treatment dropout). Empirical testing is warranted with a particular need for randomized controlled trials and guidelines on implementation and use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73461,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of nursing and health care research\",\"volume\":\"7 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11737546/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of nursing and health care research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29011/2688-9501.101549\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of nursing and health care research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29011/2688-9501.101549","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

暴饮暴食症(BED)终生患病率高,治疗成功率低,治疗不满意率高,早期停药率高,复发率高。补充和综合健康(CIH)干预措施(与传统全人治疗方法一起使用的非主流做法)具有克服许多治疗障碍和改善BED治疗结果的潜力。一些CIH干预措施对饮食失调的使用有经验支持。然而,目前对BED中CIH的使用情况知之甚少。方法:这项混合方法的横断面研究收集了BED专家关于CIH在成人BED治疗中的使用的信息。根据联邦资助、pubmed索引出版物、在该领域的实践、专业协会的领导地位和/或大众媒体的区别,确定了14名专家BED研究人员和临床医生。匿名记录的半结构化访谈由≥2名调查人员进行分析,采用反身性主题分析和量化。结果:专家对CIH使用的意见和经验总体上是积极的/支持的(64%),意见不一(36%),因干预和经验支持而异。最常见的干预措施是正念(71%)、瑜伽(64%)和补充剂/维生素/益生菌/草药(64%)。补充剂/维生素/预制剂/益生菌/草药的看法不一;所有其他干预措施都被普遍认为是积极的。与特定干预措施(例如,正念、瑜伽、补充剂)最常见的益处是:调节/容忍情绪/情绪/压力/焦虑(50%);修复与身体/身体形象/运动/运动-创伤的关系(29%);生物/生理益处(29%);直接支持治疗(“自我隔离的空间”、行为改变、“容忍治疗”)(29%)。内在的自我修复(例如,基于患者生活经验的患者天生的治愈愿望)和调查性研究也与CIH的广泛使用有关。大多数专家(57%)表示熟悉≥1项CIH干预的现有文献/研究;50%的人认为需要进行实证检验。一半(50%)自发地描述在他们自己的临床实践/中心使用了≥1次CIH干预。最常用的干预措施是瑜伽(43%)、冥想/正念(29%)和针灸(21%)。8位专家(57%)赞同正确实施的重要性;43%承认CIH用于常规治疗(第二波CBT,第三波行为治疗)。讨论与结论:CIH干预可以补充目前的BED治疗,以改善临床结果,特别是管理焦虑/压力/情绪,修复与身体的关系,解决生物/生理缺陷,并耐受治疗(从而减少治疗退出)。实证检验是有必要的,特别需要随机对照试验和实施和使用指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Complementary and Integrative Health Use in Binge Eating Disorder: A Cross-Sectional Mixed-Methods Study of Binge Eating Disorder Experts' Perspectives.

Introduction: Binge Eating Disorder (BED) has high lifetime prevalence rates, low treatment success rates, and high rates of treatment dissatisfaction, early discontinuation of care, and recurrence. Complementary and integrative health (CIH) interventions (non-mainstream practices used with conventional approaches for whole-person treatment) hold potential to overcome many treatment barriers and improve BED treatment outcomes. Some CIH interventions have empirical support for use in eating disorders. However, little is known about the current state of CIH use in BED.

Methods: This mixed-methods cross-sectional study collected information from BED experts about CIH use in adult BED treatment. Fourteen expert BED researchers and clinicians were identified based on federal funding, PubMed-indexed publications, practice in the field, leadership in professional societies, and/or popular press distinction. Anonymously recorded semi-structured interviews were analyzed by ≥2 investigators using reflexive thematic analysis and quantification.

Results: Expert opinions and experiences on/with CIH use were generally positive/supportive (64%) with mixed views (36%) varying by intervention and empirical support. The interventions most commonly described were mindfulness (71%), yoga (64%), and supplements/vitamins/pre-/probiotics/herbs (64%). Supplements/vitamins/pre-/probiotics/herbs had mixed views; all other interventions were generally viewed positively. The benefits most commonly associated with specific interventions (e.g., mindfulness, yoga, supplements) were: regulating/tolerating emotions/mood/stress/anxiety (50%); healing the relationship with the body/body image/movement/exercise-trauma (29%); biological/physiological benefits (29%); and directly supporting treatment ("space for self-separate from treatment," behavior change, "tolerating treatment") (29%). Intrinsic self-healing (e.g., patient-driven healing that comes from the patient's innate desire to heal based on the patient's lived experience(s)) and investigative research were also associated with CIH use broadly. Most experts (57%) expressed familiarity with existing literature/research for ≥1 CIH intervention; 50% identified a need for empirical testing. Half (50%) spontaneously described using ≥1 CIH intervention in their own clinical practice/center. The most used interventions were yoga (43%), meditation/mindfulness (29%), and acupuncture (21%). Eight experts (57%) endorsed the importance of correct implementation; 43% acknowledged CIH use in conventional treatments (2nd-wave CBT, 3rd-wave behavior therapies).

Discussion & conclusions: CIH interventions can complement current BED treatments to improve clinical outcomes, particularly managing anxiety/stress/mood, healing the relationship with the body, addressing biological/physiological deficiencies, and tolerating treatment (thus reducing treatment dropout). Empirical testing is warranted with a particular need for randomized controlled trials and guidelines on implementation and use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信