Rosemary McBain, Karen Reidy, Ricardo Palma-Dias, Martin Healey
{"title":"超声显示子宫内膜囊性间隙及其与病理诊断的相关性:一项在三级中心的当代回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Rosemary McBain, Karen Reidy, Ricardo Palma-Dias, Martin Healey","doi":"10.1111/ajo.13914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the correlation between the ultrasound finding of cystic spaces in the endometrium and endometrial hyperplasia or cancer.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective cohort study at a tertiary teaching hospital in Victoria, Australia, between January 2014 and December 2016. Patients who had a tertiary ultrasound where the endometrium was assessed and underwent endometrial sampling in the subsequent year were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 1614 patients who were included, and 154 (9.5%) had endometrial cystic spaces on ultrasound. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for a histological finding of polyps were 16.3%, 93.4%, 51.3% and 72.3%, respectively; for endometrial hyperplasia without atypia (EH no A) 40.7%, 91.0%, 7.1% and 98.9%, respectively; for hyperplasia with atypia (EH with A) 25.0%, 90.8%, 5.2%, 98.4%, respectively and for endometrial cancer were 19.5%, 90.7%, 5.2% and 97.7%, respectively. When adjusted for age, endometrial thickness and the presence of polyps on ultrasound, cystic spaces increased the odds of a histologic diagnosis of polyps (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.13 (95% CI 1.41-3.21) P < 0.001) or EH no A (aOR 5.20 (95% CI 2.06-13.12) P < 0.001) and reduced the odds of endometrial cancer (aOR 0.26 (0.08-0.81) P = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cystic spaces on ultrasound are more likely to indicate the presence of EH no A or an endometrial polyp than endometrial cancer. As one in ten patients who had cystic spaces on tertiary ultrasound had a pathologic diagnosis of EH with A or carcinoma, there remains a need for sampling in this group until better data are available.</p>","PeriodicalId":55429,"journal":{"name":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cystic Spaces in the Endometrium on Ultrasound and Correlations With Pathological Diagnosis: A Contemporary Retrospective Cohort Study in a Tertiary Centre.\",\"authors\":\"Rosemary McBain, Karen Reidy, Ricardo Palma-Dias, Martin Healey\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ajo.13914\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the correlation between the ultrasound finding of cystic spaces in the endometrium and endometrial hyperplasia or cancer.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective cohort study at a tertiary teaching hospital in Victoria, Australia, between January 2014 and December 2016. Patients who had a tertiary ultrasound where the endometrium was assessed and underwent endometrial sampling in the subsequent year were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 1614 patients who were included, and 154 (9.5%) had endometrial cystic spaces on ultrasound. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for a histological finding of polyps were 16.3%, 93.4%, 51.3% and 72.3%, respectively; for endometrial hyperplasia without atypia (EH no A) 40.7%, 91.0%, 7.1% and 98.9%, respectively; for hyperplasia with atypia (EH with A) 25.0%, 90.8%, 5.2%, 98.4%, respectively and for endometrial cancer were 19.5%, 90.7%, 5.2% and 97.7%, respectively. When adjusted for age, endometrial thickness and the presence of polyps on ultrasound, cystic spaces increased the odds of a histologic diagnosis of polyps (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.13 (95% CI 1.41-3.21) P < 0.001) or EH no A (aOR 5.20 (95% CI 2.06-13.12) P < 0.001) and reduced the odds of endometrial cancer (aOR 0.26 (0.08-0.81) P = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cystic spaces on ultrasound are more likely to indicate the presence of EH no A or an endometrial polyp than endometrial cancer. As one in ten patients who had cystic spaces on tertiary ultrasound had a pathologic diagnosis of EH with A or carcinoma, there remains a need for sampling in this group until better data are available.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55429,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.13914\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.13914","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:探讨超声诊断子宫内膜囊性间隙与子宫内膜增生或癌的关系。材料和方法:我们于2014年1月至2016年12月在澳大利亚维多利亚州的一家三级教学医院进行了回顾性队列研究。接受第三次超声检查并在随后一年接受子宫内膜取样的患者也包括在内。结果:共纳入1614例患者,超声显示子宫内膜囊性间隙154例(9.5%)。息肉的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为16.3%、93.4%、51.3%和72.3%;无异型性子宫内膜增生(EH no A)分别为40.7%、91.0%、7.1%和98.9%;异型增生(EH + A)分别为25.0%、90.8%、5.2%、98.4%,子宫内膜癌分别为19.5%、90.7%、5.2%、97.7%。经年龄、子宫内膜厚度和超声检查是否有息肉等因素调整后,囊性间隙增加了息肉的组织学诊断几率(调整优势比(aOR) 2.13 (95% CI 1.41-3.21) P结论:超声检查的囊性间隙更有可能提示EH - a或子宫内膜息肉的存在,而不是子宫内膜癌。由于三次超声显示囊性间隙的患者中有十分之一的患者病理诊断为EH伴a或癌,因此在获得更好的数据之前,仍需要对该组进行抽样。
Cystic Spaces in the Endometrium on Ultrasound and Correlations With Pathological Diagnosis: A Contemporary Retrospective Cohort Study in a Tertiary Centre.
Objectives: To determine the correlation between the ultrasound finding of cystic spaces in the endometrium and endometrial hyperplasia or cancer.
Materials and methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study at a tertiary teaching hospital in Victoria, Australia, between January 2014 and December 2016. Patients who had a tertiary ultrasound where the endometrium was assessed and underwent endometrial sampling in the subsequent year were included.
Results: There were 1614 patients who were included, and 154 (9.5%) had endometrial cystic spaces on ultrasound. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for a histological finding of polyps were 16.3%, 93.4%, 51.3% and 72.3%, respectively; for endometrial hyperplasia without atypia (EH no A) 40.7%, 91.0%, 7.1% and 98.9%, respectively; for hyperplasia with atypia (EH with A) 25.0%, 90.8%, 5.2%, 98.4%, respectively and for endometrial cancer were 19.5%, 90.7%, 5.2% and 97.7%, respectively. When adjusted for age, endometrial thickness and the presence of polyps on ultrasound, cystic spaces increased the odds of a histologic diagnosis of polyps (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.13 (95% CI 1.41-3.21) P < 0.001) or EH no A (aOR 5.20 (95% CI 2.06-13.12) P < 0.001) and reduced the odds of endometrial cancer (aOR 0.26 (0.08-0.81) P = 0.02).
Conclusion: Cystic spaces on ultrasound are more likely to indicate the presence of EH no A or an endometrial polyp than endometrial cancer. As one in ten patients who had cystic spaces on tertiary ultrasound had a pathologic diagnosis of EH with A or carcinoma, there remains a need for sampling in this group until better data are available.
期刊介绍:
The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (ANZJOG) is an editorially independent publication owned by the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RANZCOG) and the RANZCOG Research foundation. ANZJOG aims to provide a medium for the publication of original contributions to clinical practice and/or research in all fields of obstetrics and gynaecology and related disciplines. Articles are peer reviewed by clinicians or researchers expert in the field of the submitted work. From time to time the journal will also publish printed abstracts from the RANZCOG Annual Scientific Meeting and meetings of relevant special interest groups, where the accepted abstracts have undergone the journals peer review acceptance process.