“有志者事竟成”:在大流行紧急情况下,各州差异对实施产后护理持续覆盖的影响。

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Ashley Fox, Frances M Howell, Ellerie Weber, Teresa Janevic
{"title":"“有志者事竟成”:在大流行紧急情况下,各州差异对实施产后护理持续覆盖的影响。","authors":"Ashley Fox, Frances M Howell, Ellerie Weber, Teresa Janevic","doi":"10.1111/1475-6773.14435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore how the Medicaid continuous coverage requirement and unwinding process was implemented in three states with diverse existing policy environments and implications for the implementation of post-emergency 12-month postpartum extensions.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>State data on unwinding performance and qualitative in-depth interviews with 48 stakeholders and patient-facing healthcare workers in Texas, New York and New Jersey.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>State Medicaid stakeholders and patient-facing healthcare workers in each state were interviewed with the goal of gaining insights into: (1) How the continuous coverage requirement was implemented; (2) What effects continuous coverage had on access to care for postpartum mothers; (3) How states are implementing the pandemic unwinding and postpartum extensions.</p><p><strong>Data collection/extraction: </strong>Interviews were recorded and took place over Zoom between September 2022 and March 2024. Interview transcripts were analyzed thematically using an open coding approach.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>The study found that low awareness of the continuous coverage requirement blunted potential benefits: little changed in practice in recommended patient care or follow-up procedures. Differences in state unwinding approaches reflected differential state capacity to minimize procedural disenrollment and political incentives to either rapidly reduce or maintain Medicaid rolls. Based on these findings, we describe how political will, state capacity and policy legacies interact to either increase or decrease administrative burdens associated with program enrollment/re-enrollment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While the continuous coverage requirement in theory applies equally across US states, its implementation was inconsistent and influenced by state capacity and political objectives creating differential experiences across states. To ensure that postpartum Medicaid coverage extensions have maximal impact on improving maternal health, states should develop improved communication strategies to ensure that providers and community-based organizations are aware of coverage changes and leverage available flexibilities to increase use of administrative renewal and ensure smooth coverage transitions.</p>","PeriodicalId":55065,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research","volume":" ","pages":"e14435"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"Where There's a Will There's a Way\\\": The Impact of State Variations in the Implementation of Continuous Coverage on Access to Postpartum Care During the Pandemic Emergency.\",\"authors\":\"Ashley Fox, Frances M Howell, Ellerie Weber, Teresa Janevic\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1475-6773.14435\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore how the Medicaid continuous coverage requirement and unwinding process was implemented in three states with diverse existing policy environments and implications for the implementation of post-emergency 12-month postpartum extensions.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>State data on unwinding performance and qualitative in-depth interviews with 48 stakeholders and patient-facing healthcare workers in Texas, New York and New Jersey.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>State Medicaid stakeholders and patient-facing healthcare workers in each state were interviewed with the goal of gaining insights into: (1) How the continuous coverage requirement was implemented; (2) What effects continuous coverage had on access to care for postpartum mothers; (3) How states are implementing the pandemic unwinding and postpartum extensions.</p><p><strong>Data collection/extraction: </strong>Interviews were recorded and took place over Zoom between September 2022 and March 2024. Interview transcripts were analyzed thematically using an open coding approach.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>The study found that low awareness of the continuous coverage requirement blunted potential benefits: little changed in practice in recommended patient care or follow-up procedures. Differences in state unwinding approaches reflected differential state capacity to minimize procedural disenrollment and political incentives to either rapidly reduce or maintain Medicaid rolls. Based on these findings, we describe how political will, state capacity and policy legacies interact to either increase or decrease administrative burdens associated with program enrollment/re-enrollment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While the continuous coverage requirement in theory applies equally across US states, its implementation was inconsistent and influenced by state capacity and political objectives creating differential experiences across states. To ensure that postpartum Medicaid coverage extensions have maximal impact on improving maternal health, states should develop improved communication strategies to ensure that providers and community-based organizations are aware of coverage changes and leverage available flexibilities to increase use of administrative renewal and ensure smooth coverage transitions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55065,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Services Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e14435\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Services Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.14435\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.14435","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨医疗补助持续覆盖要求和解除过程如何在三个具有不同现有政策环境的州实施,以及对实施紧急后产后12个月延长的影响。数据来源:对德克萨斯州、纽约州和新泽西州的48名利益相关者和面向患者的医疗保健工作者进行的关于解除绩效的州数据和定性深入访谈。研究设计:对每个州的州医疗补助利益相关者和面向患者的医疗工作者进行访谈,目的是了解:(1)如何实施连续覆盖要求;(2)持续覆盖对产后母亲获得护理有何影响;(3)各国如何实施大流行解除和产后延长。数据收集/提取:在2022年9月至2024年3月期间,通过Zoom记录和进行访谈。访谈记录采用开放式编码方法进行主题分析。主要发现:研究发现,对持续覆盖要求的认识不足削弱了潜在的好处:在推荐的患者护理或随访过程中几乎没有改变。各州撤销方案的不同反映了各州在尽量减少程序性注销和迅速减少或维持医疗补助计划的政治动机方面的能力不同。基于这些发现,我们描述了政治意愿、国家能力和政策遗产如何相互作用,以增加或减少与项目注册/重新注册相关的行政负担。结论:虽然理论上的持续覆盖要求在美国各州同样适用,但其实施并不一致,并受到各州能力和政治目标的影响,导致各州之间的经验差异。为确保扩大产后医疗补助覆盖范围对改善孕产妇健康产生最大影响,各州应制定改进的沟通战略,以确保提供者和社区组织了解覆盖范围的变化,并利用现有的灵活性,增加行政更新的使用,确保覆盖范围的顺利过渡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
"Where There's a Will There's a Way": The Impact of State Variations in the Implementation of Continuous Coverage on Access to Postpartum Care During the Pandemic Emergency.

Objectives: To explore how the Medicaid continuous coverage requirement and unwinding process was implemented in three states with diverse existing policy environments and implications for the implementation of post-emergency 12-month postpartum extensions.

Data sources: State data on unwinding performance and qualitative in-depth interviews with 48 stakeholders and patient-facing healthcare workers in Texas, New York and New Jersey.

Study design: State Medicaid stakeholders and patient-facing healthcare workers in each state were interviewed with the goal of gaining insights into: (1) How the continuous coverage requirement was implemented; (2) What effects continuous coverage had on access to care for postpartum mothers; (3) How states are implementing the pandemic unwinding and postpartum extensions.

Data collection/extraction: Interviews were recorded and took place over Zoom between September 2022 and March 2024. Interview transcripts were analyzed thematically using an open coding approach.

Principal findings: The study found that low awareness of the continuous coverage requirement blunted potential benefits: little changed in practice in recommended patient care or follow-up procedures. Differences in state unwinding approaches reflected differential state capacity to minimize procedural disenrollment and political incentives to either rapidly reduce or maintain Medicaid rolls. Based on these findings, we describe how political will, state capacity and policy legacies interact to either increase or decrease administrative burdens associated with program enrollment/re-enrollment.

Conclusions: While the continuous coverage requirement in theory applies equally across US states, its implementation was inconsistent and influenced by state capacity and political objectives creating differential experiences across states. To ensure that postpartum Medicaid coverage extensions have maximal impact on improving maternal health, states should develop improved communication strategies to ensure that providers and community-based organizations are aware of coverage changes and leverage available flexibilities to increase use of administrative renewal and ensure smooth coverage transitions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Services Research
Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
193
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Services Research (HSR) is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal that provides researchers and public and private policymakers with the latest research findings, methods, and concepts related to the financing, organization, delivery, evaluation, and outcomes of health services. Rated as one of the top journals in the fields of health policy and services and health care administration, HSR publishes outstanding articles reporting the findings of original investigations that expand knowledge and understanding of the wide-ranging field of health care and that will help to improve the health of individuals and communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信