老年患者全科住院出院总结管理的民族志研究。

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Rachel Spencer, Zakia Shariff, Jeremy Dale, Graeme Currie
{"title":"老年患者全科住院出院总结管理的民族志研究。","authors":"Rachel Spencer, Zakia Shariff, Jeremy Dale, Graeme Currie","doi":"10.3399/BJGP.2024.0284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Post-inpatient discharge is a risky time for older patients, especially those with polypharmacy and multi-morbidity. General practice care at this time, including the processes for managing hospital discharge summaries, lacks standardisation and is of variable quality. Understanding these processes will support the design of interventions and guidance to improve general practice management of the post-discharge period.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>Understand and visualise how ongoing care for older people after discharge from hospital is organised in general practice, including the processes for managing discharge summaries.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>10 practices in the West Midlands, England took part in a rapid ethnography in which we mapped their systems of post-discharge care.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data sources included: informal conversations with staff, practice policies and direct observations of discharge summary handling. Fieldnotes and quotes were subject to an interpretivist framework analysis. A systems modelling technique (FRAM) was used to present visual representations of the professional roles working in these complex systems.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three basic typographies of system emerged based on professional roles: GP led, Pharmacist led and Administrative led. We report on three themes which weave around the FRAM process maps: comfort with demands of administrative role; general practice team dynamics; and interaction with patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>General practice systems for inpatient discharge summary processing are complex and varied. New roles in general practices are being used extensively, often requiring significant input in supervision by GPs. Our findings highlight safety features of different systems and should help practices understand the advantages/limitations of models they work within.</p>","PeriodicalId":55320,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of General Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An ethnography of General Practice inpatient discharge summary management for older patients.\",\"authors\":\"Rachel Spencer, Zakia Shariff, Jeremy Dale, Graeme Currie\",\"doi\":\"10.3399/BJGP.2024.0284\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Post-inpatient discharge is a risky time for older patients, especially those with polypharmacy and multi-morbidity. General practice care at this time, including the processes for managing hospital discharge summaries, lacks standardisation and is of variable quality. Understanding these processes will support the design of interventions and guidance to improve general practice management of the post-discharge period.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>Understand and visualise how ongoing care for older people after discharge from hospital is organised in general practice, including the processes for managing discharge summaries.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>10 practices in the West Midlands, England took part in a rapid ethnography in which we mapped their systems of post-discharge care.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data sources included: informal conversations with staff, practice policies and direct observations of discharge summary handling. Fieldnotes and quotes were subject to an interpretivist framework analysis. A systems modelling technique (FRAM) was used to present visual representations of the professional roles working in these complex systems.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three basic typographies of system emerged based on professional roles: GP led, Pharmacist led and Administrative led. We report on three themes which weave around the FRAM process maps: comfort with demands of administrative role; general practice team dynamics; and interaction with patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>General practice systems for inpatient discharge summary processing are complex and varied. New roles in general practices are being used extensively, often requiring significant input in supervision by GPs. Our findings highlight safety features of different systems and should help practices understand the advantages/limitations of models they work within.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55320,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of General Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of General Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2024.0284\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2024.0284","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:老年患者住院后出院是一个危险的时间,尤其是那些有多种药物和多种疾病的患者。目前的普通医疗保健,包括管理出院摘要的程序,缺乏标准化,质量参差不齐。了解这些过程将有助于设计干预措施和指导,以改善出院后时期的一般实践管理。目的:了解和可视化在一般实践中如何组织老年人出院后的持续护理,包括管理出院摘要的过程。设计和设置:英格兰西米德兰兹郡的10个实践参与了一个快速人种志我们绘制了他们的出院后护理系统。方法:数据来源包括:与员工的非正式谈话、实践政策和出院总结处理的直接观察。现场记录和引文都采用了解释主义框架分析。使用系统建模技术(FRAM)来呈现在这些复杂系统中工作的专业角色的可视化表示。结果:基于职业角色,系统出现了三种基本类型:全科医生主导、药剂师主导和行政管理主导。我们报告围绕FRAM进程图的三个主题:适应行政角色的要求;全科医生团队动态;以及与病人的互动。结论:全科系统的住院病人出院汇总处理复杂多样。全科实践中的新角色正在广泛使用,通常需要全科医生在监督方面投入大量资金。我们的研究结果强调了不同系统的安全特性,应该有助于实践了解他们所使用的模型的优点/局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An ethnography of General Practice inpatient discharge summary management for older patients.

Background: Post-inpatient discharge is a risky time for older patients, especially those with polypharmacy and multi-morbidity. General practice care at this time, including the processes for managing hospital discharge summaries, lacks standardisation and is of variable quality. Understanding these processes will support the design of interventions and guidance to improve general practice management of the post-discharge period.

Aim: Understand and visualise how ongoing care for older people after discharge from hospital is organised in general practice, including the processes for managing discharge summaries.

Design and setting: 10 practices in the West Midlands, England took part in a rapid ethnography in which we mapped their systems of post-discharge care.

Method: Data sources included: informal conversations with staff, practice policies and direct observations of discharge summary handling. Fieldnotes and quotes were subject to an interpretivist framework analysis. A systems modelling technique (FRAM) was used to present visual representations of the professional roles working in these complex systems.

Results: Three basic typographies of system emerged based on professional roles: GP led, Pharmacist led and Administrative led. We report on three themes which weave around the FRAM process maps: comfort with demands of administrative role; general practice team dynamics; and interaction with patients.

Conclusion: General practice systems for inpatient discharge summary processing are complex and varied. New roles in general practices are being used extensively, often requiring significant input in supervision by GPs. Our findings highlight safety features of different systems and should help practices understand the advantages/limitations of models they work within.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of General Practice
British Journal of General Practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.20%
发文量
681
期刊介绍: The British Journal of General Practice is an international journal publishing research, editorials, debate and analysis, and clinical guidance for family practitioners and primary care researchers worldwide. BJGP began in 1953 as the ‘College of General Practitioners’ Research Newsletter’, with the ‘Journal of the College of General Practitioners’ first appearing in 1960. Following the change in status of the College, the ‘Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners’ was launched in 1967. Three editors later, in 1990, the title was changed to the ‘British Journal of General Practice’. The journal is commonly referred to as the ''BJGP'', and is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信