扳机指管理的协作跨学科方法。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Emma Yanko, Chris Thomson, Richard Bourassa, Curtis Gasmo, Thuy Le, Katie Crockett
{"title":"扳机指管理的协作跨学科方法。","authors":"Emma Yanko, Chris Thomson, Richard Bourassa, Curtis Gasmo, Thuy Le, Katie Crockett","doi":"10.1016/j.jht.2024.12.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stenosing tenosynovitis, or trigger finger, is a common cause of hand disability. This study outlines a trigger finger management protocol that redirects referrals for surgical consultations to conservative management first.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The primary outcome variable was the protocol endpoint based on the resolution of trigger finger symptoms (i.e. pain and triggering). Secondary outcome measures were to identify which patient characteristics were associated with an increased need for (i) surgical management and (ii) corticosteroid injections.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective chart review.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study sample included all patients referred for surgical consultation for trigger finger who were redirected to physical therapy first between the dates of August 2018 and January 2023 (n = 72). Participants initially received a physical therapy assessment and three treatment sessions. Further management was determined based on patient presentation following our protocol. Descriptive analysis involved frequency calculations of studied variables. Comparison of patient characteristics and treatment modalities across different sub-groups was examined as well as associations between various patient characteristics and increased need for (i) surgical management and (ii) corticosteroid injection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-two patients were included in the study, and 60 patients completed the protocol. Of these patients, 22% (n = 16) resolved with physical therapy (PT) alone, 48.5% (n = 35) resolved with 1-2 corticosteroid injections following initial PT management and 12.5% (n = 9) were referred back for surgical consult. Sub-group comparisons revealed no significant differences in patient characteristics and treatment modalities across patients who resolved with physical therapy alone, physical therapy plus 1-2 injections, or in cases referred back for surgical consults.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The interdisciplinary care protocol in this study demonstrated that conservative management was successful in a majority of cases; facilitating timely access to evidence-based care, including corticosteroid injections and surgical management if necessary. Physical therapy treatment provides self-management and education strategies to those requiring further interventions, potentially reducing recurrence rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":54814,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A collaborative interdisciplinary approach for trigger finger management.\",\"authors\":\"Emma Yanko, Chris Thomson, Richard Bourassa, Curtis Gasmo, Thuy Le, Katie Crockett\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jht.2024.12.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stenosing tenosynovitis, or trigger finger, is a common cause of hand disability. This study outlines a trigger finger management protocol that redirects referrals for surgical consultations to conservative management first.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The primary outcome variable was the protocol endpoint based on the resolution of trigger finger symptoms (i.e. pain and triggering). Secondary outcome measures were to identify which patient characteristics were associated with an increased need for (i) surgical management and (ii) corticosteroid injections.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective chart review.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study sample included all patients referred for surgical consultation for trigger finger who were redirected to physical therapy first between the dates of August 2018 and January 2023 (n = 72). Participants initially received a physical therapy assessment and three treatment sessions. Further management was determined based on patient presentation following our protocol. Descriptive analysis involved frequency calculations of studied variables. Comparison of patient characteristics and treatment modalities across different sub-groups was examined as well as associations between various patient characteristics and increased need for (i) surgical management and (ii) corticosteroid injection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-two patients were included in the study, and 60 patients completed the protocol. Of these patients, 22% (n = 16) resolved with physical therapy (PT) alone, 48.5% (n = 35) resolved with 1-2 corticosteroid injections following initial PT management and 12.5% (n = 9) were referred back for surgical consult. Sub-group comparisons revealed no significant differences in patient characteristics and treatment modalities across patients who resolved with physical therapy alone, physical therapy plus 1-2 injections, or in cases referred back for surgical consults.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The interdisciplinary care protocol in this study demonstrated that conservative management was successful in a majority of cases; facilitating timely access to evidence-based care, including corticosteroid injections and surgical management if necessary. Physical therapy treatment provides self-management and education strategies to those requiring further interventions, potentially reducing recurrence rates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54814,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hand Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hand Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2024.12.003\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2024.12.003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:狭窄性腱鞘炎,或扳机指,是手部残疾的常见原因。本研究概述了一种触发手指管理方案,该方案将外科会诊的转诊重新定向到保守管理。目的:主要结局变量是基于触发指症状(即疼痛和触发)的解决的方案终点。次要结局指标是确定哪些患者特征与(i)手术治疗和(ii)皮质类固醇注射的需求增加有关。研究设计:回顾性图表回顾。方法:研究样本包括2018年8月至2023年1月期间所有因扳机指进行外科会诊的患者(n = 72)。参与者最初接受了物理治疗评估和三次治疗。进一步的治疗是根据病人的表现来决定的。描述性分析涉及研究变量的频率计算。比较了不同亚组的患者特征和治疗方式,以及不同患者特征与(i)手术治疗和(ii)皮质类固醇注射需求增加之间的关系。结果:72例患者纳入研究,60例患者完成了方案。在这些患者中,22% (n = 16)仅通过物理治疗(PT)解决,48.5% (n = 35)在初始PT治疗后通过1-2次皮质类固醇注射解决,12.5% (n = 9)再次转诊进行手术咨询。亚组比较显示,在单独进行物理治疗、物理治疗加1-2次注射或转介回外科会诊的患者中,患者特征和治疗方式没有显著差异。结论:本研究的跨学科治疗方案表明保守治疗在大多数病例中是成功的;促进及时获得循证护理,包括必要时进行皮质类固醇注射和手术治疗。物理治疗为那些需要进一步干预的患者提供了自我管理和教育策略,有可能降低复发率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A collaborative interdisciplinary approach for trigger finger management.

Background: Stenosing tenosynovitis, or trigger finger, is a common cause of hand disability. This study outlines a trigger finger management protocol that redirects referrals for surgical consultations to conservative management first.

Purpose: The primary outcome variable was the protocol endpoint based on the resolution of trigger finger symptoms (i.e. pain and triggering). Secondary outcome measures were to identify which patient characteristics were associated with an increased need for (i) surgical management and (ii) corticosteroid injections.

Study design: Retrospective chart review.

Methods: The study sample included all patients referred for surgical consultation for trigger finger who were redirected to physical therapy first between the dates of August 2018 and January 2023 (n = 72). Participants initially received a physical therapy assessment and three treatment sessions. Further management was determined based on patient presentation following our protocol. Descriptive analysis involved frequency calculations of studied variables. Comparison of patient characteristics and treatment modalities across different sub-groups was examined as well as associations between various patient characteristics and increased need for (i) surgical management and (ii) corticosteroid injection.

Results: Seventy-two patients were included in the study, and 60 patients completed the protocol. Of these patients, 22% (n = 16) resolved with physical therapy (PT) alone, 48.5% (n = 35) resolved with 1-2 corticosteroid injections following initial PT management and 12.5% (n = 9) were referred back for surgical consult. Sub-group comparisons revealed no significant differences in patient characteristics and treatment modalities across patients who resolved with physical therapy alone, physical therapy plus 1-2 injections, or in cases referred back for surgical consults.

Conclusion: The interdisciplinary care protocol in this study demonstrated that conservative management was successful in a majority of cases; facilitating timely access to evidence-based care, including corticosteroid injections and surgical management if necessary. Physical therapy treatment provides self-management and education strategies to those requiring further interventions, potentially reducing recurrence rates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hand Therapy
Journal of Hand Therapy 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
19.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hand Therapy is designed for hand therapists, occupational and physical therapists, and other hand specialists involved in the rehabilitation of disabling hand problems. The Journal functions as a source of education and information by publishing scientific and clinical articles. Regular features include original reports, clinical reviews, case studies, editorials, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信