{"title":"真实的不诚实行为与诚实学生的自我认知:实时观察和自我报告研究。","authors":"Efrat Danino, Elena Maoz","doi":"10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Academic dishonesty poses significant challenges in educational settings, particularly among nursing students. Efforts to mitigate this issue through pedagogical and technological approaches have seen limited success. Diverse theoretical explanations for academic dishonesty underscore the need for further exploration of this multifaceted phenomenon.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This research explored self-reported and real-time observed dishonest behaviours among nursing students during in-person quizzes.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Mixed methods: self-reporting and real-time observations using classroom cameras.</p><p><strong>Settings: </strong>Nursing academic campus.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Third-year baccalaureate nursing students (n = 72). The mean age was 27 years; 75.5 % were female, and 18.4 % identified as married.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data collection spanned three phases: pre-research preparation, in-class observations during quizzes, and post-quiz self-reporting. Independent observers conducted observations to prevent biases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Observations identified speaking as the most common dishonest activity, followed by peeking and phone use. New forms of dishonesty included copying from quiz sheets and making phone calls during quizzes. Dishonest activities increased over the semester, particularly speaking and peeking. Questionnaire responses showed most students viewed dishonest behaviours as forbidden, though 37 % allowed signing for others. While students rated themselves as moderate to completely honest, about 50 % admitted to occasional dishonest behaviours. Logistic regression revealed internal moral principles and self-concept as significant predictors of honest behaviour (R2 = 39.6 %; p < 0.05). Decision tree analysis revealed detailed relationships between internal moral principles, self-concept, and behavioural cataloguing in predicting honest and dishonest behaviours.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study uncovered a concerning gap between students' professed integrity and their actual dishonest behaviour during quizzes, showing an upward trend over time. This suggests complex influences shaping students' decisions. Observing peers' dishonesty may normalize such behaviour, fuelling its spread. Educational efforts should aim at bridging the gap between students' values and actions, employing methods that nurture practical skills related to integrity and promoting positive role models to foster a culture of honesty.</p>","PeriodicalId":54704,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education Today","volume":"147 ","pages":"106575"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Actual dishonest behaviour versus self-perception as an honest student: Real time observational and self-report study.\",\"authors\":\"Efrat Danino, Elena Maoz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106575\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Academic dishonesty poses significant challenges in educational settings, particularly among nursing students. Efforts to mitigate this issue through pedagogical and technological approaches have seen limited success. Diverse theoretical explanations for academic dishonesty underscore the need for further exploration of this multifaceted phenomenon.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This research explored self-reported and real-time observed dishonest behaviours among nursing students during in-person quizzes.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Mixed methods: self-reporting and real-time observations using classroom cameras.</p><p><strong>Settings: </strong>Nursing academic campus.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Third-year baccalaureate nursing students (n = 72). The mean age was 27 years; 75.5 % were female, and 18.4 % identified as married.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data collection spanned three phases: pre-research preparation, in-class observations during quizzes, and post-quiz self-reporting. Independent observers conducted observations to prevent biases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Observations identified speaking as the most common dishonest activity, followed by peeking and phone use. New forms of dishonesty included copying from quiz sheets and making phone calls during quizzes. Dishonest activities increased over the semester, particularly speaking and peeking. Questionnaire responses showed most students viewed dishonest behaviours as forbidden, though 37 % allowed signing for others. While students rated themselves as moderate to completely honest, about 50 % admitted to occasional dishonest behaviours. Logistic regression revealed internal moral principles and self-concept as significant predictors of honest behaviour (R2 = 39.6 %; p < 0.05). Decision tree analysis revealed detailed relationships between internal moral principles, self-concept, and behavioural cataloguing in predicting honest and dishonest behaviours.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study uncovered a concerning gap between students' professed integrity and their actual dishonest behaviour during quizzes, showing an upward trend over time. This suggests complex influences shaping students' decisions. Observing peers' dishonesty may normalize such behaviour, fuelling its spread. Educational efforts should aim at bridging the gap between students' values and actions, employing methods that nurture practical skills related to integrity and promoting positive role models to foster a culture of honesty.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54704,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nurse Education Today\",\"volume\":\"147 \",\"pages\":\"106575\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nurse Education Today\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106575\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Education Today","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106575","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Actual dishonest behaviour versus self-perception as an honest student: Real time observational and self-report study.
Background: Academic dishonesty poses significant challenges in educational settings, particularly among nursing students. Efforts to mitigate this issue through pedagogical and technological approaches have seen limited success. Diverse theoretical explanations for academic dishonesty underscore the need for further exploration of this multifaceted phenomenon.
Aim: This research explored self-reported and real-time observed dishonest behaviours among nursing students during in-person quizzes.
Design: Mixed methods: self-reporting and real-time observations using classroom cameras.
Settings: Nursing academic campus.
Participants: Third-year baccalaureate nursing students (n = 72). The mean age was 27 years; 75.5 % were female, and 18.4 % identified as married.
Methods: Data collection spanned three phases: pre-research preparation, in-class observations during quizzes, and post-quiz self-reporting. Independent observers conducted observations to prevent biases.
Results: Observations identified speaking as the most common dishonest activity, followed by peeking and phone use. New forms of dishonesty included copying from quiz sheets and making phone calls during quizzes. Dishonest activities increased over the semester, particularly speaking and peeking. Questionnaire responses showed most students viewed dishonest behaviours as forbidden, though 37 % allowed signing for others. While students rated themselves as moderate to completely honest, about 50 % admitted to occasional dishonest behaviours. Logistic regression revealed internal moral principles and self-concept as significant predictors of honest behaviour (R2 = 39.6 %; p < 0.05). Decision tree analysis revealed detailed relationships between internal moral principles, self-concept, and behavioural cataloguing in predicting honest and dishonest behaviours.
Conclusion: The study uncovered a concerning gap between students' professed integrity and their actual dishonest behaviour during quizzes, showing an upward trend over time. This suggests complex influences shaping students' decisions. Observing peers' dishonesty may normalize such behaviour, fuelling its spread. Educational efforts should aim at bridging the gap between students' values and actions, employing methods that nurture practical skills related to integrity and promoting positive role models to foster a culture of honesty.
期刊介绍:
Nurse Education Today is the leading international journal providing a forum for the publication of high quality original research, review and debate in the discussion of nursing, midwifery and interprofessional health care education, publishing papers which contribute to the advancement of educational theory and pedagogy that support the evidence-based practice for educationalists worldwide. The journal stimulates and values critical scholarly debate on issues that have strategic relevance for leaders of health care education.
The journal publishes the highest quality scholarly contributions reflecting the diversity of people, health and education systems worldwide, by publishing research that employs rigorous methodology as well as by publishing papers that highlight the theoretical underpinnings of education and systems globally. The journal will publish papers that show depth, rigour, originality and high standards of presentation, in particular, work that is original, analytical and constructively critical of both previous work and current initiatives.
Authors are invited to submit original research, systematic and scholarly reviews, and critical papers which will stimulate debate on research, policy, theory or philosophy of nursing and related health care education, and which will meet and develop the journal''s high academic and ethical standards.