真实的不诚实行为与诚实学生的自我认知:实时观察和自我报告研究。

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Efrat Danino, Elena Maoz
{"title":"真实的不诚实行为与诚实学生的自我认知:实时观察和自我报告研究。","authors":"Efrat Danino, Elena Maoz","doi":"10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Academic dishonesty poses significant challenges in educational settings, particularly among nursing students. Efforts to mitigate this issue through pedagogical and technological approaches have seen limited success. Diverse theoretical explanations for academic dishonesty underscore the need for further exploration of this multifaceted phenomenon.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This research explored self-reported and real-time observed dishonest behaviours among nursing students during in-person quizzes.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Mixed methods: self-reporting and real-time observations using classroom cameras.</p><p><strong>Settings: </strong>Nursing academic campus.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Third-year baccalaureate nursing students (n = 72). The mean age was 27 years; 75.5 % were female, and 18.4 % identified as married.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data collection spanned three phases: pre-research preparation, in-class observations during quizzes, and post-quiz self-reporting. Independent observers conducted observations to prevent biases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Observations identified speaking as the most common dishonest activity, followed by peeking and phone use. New forms of dishonesty included copying from quiz sheets and making phone calls during quizzes. Dishonest activities increased over the semester, particularly speaking and peeking. Questionnaire responses showed most students viewed dishonest behaviours as forbidden, though 37 % allowed signing for others. While students rated themselves as moderate to completely honest, about 50 % admitted to occasional dishonest behaviours. Logistic regression revealed internal moral principles and self-concept as significant predictors of honest behaviour (R2 = 39.6 %; p < 0.05). Decision tree analysis revealed detailed relationships between internal moral principles, self-concept, and behavioural cataloguing in predicting honest and dishonest behaviours.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study uncovered a concerning gap between students' professed integrity and their actual dishonest behaviour during quizzes, showing an upward trend over time. This suggests complex influences shaping students' decisions. Observing peers' dishonesty may normalize such behaviour, fuelling its spread. Educational efforts should aim at bridging the gap between students' values and actions, employing methods that nurture practical skills related to integrity and promoting positive role models to foster a culture of honesty.</p>","PeriodicalId":54704,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education Today","volume":"147 ","pages":"106575"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Actual dishonest behaviour versus self-perception as an honest student: Real time observational and self-report study.\",\"authors\":\"Efrat Danino, Elena Maoz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106575\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Academic dishonesty poses significant challenges in educational settings, particularly among nursing students. Efforts to mitigate this issue through pedagogical and technological approaches have seen limited success. Diverse theoretical explanations for academic dishonesty underscore the need for further exploration of this multifaceted phenomenon.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This research explored self-reported and real-time observed dishonest behaviours among nursing students during in-person quizzes.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Mixed methods: self-reporting and real-time observations using classroom cameras.</p><p><strong>Settings: </strong>Nursing academic campus.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Third-year baccalaureate nursing students (n = 72). The mean age was 27 years; 75.5 % were female, and 18.4 % identified as married.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data collection spanned three phases: pre-research preparation, in-class observations during quizzes, and post-quiz self-reporting. Independent observers conducted observations to prevent biases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Observations identified speaking as the most common dishonest activity, followed by peeking and phone use. New forms of dishonesty included copying from quiz sheets and making phone calls during quizzes. Dishonest activities increased over the semester, particularly speaking and peeking. Questionnaire responses showed most students viewed dishonest behaviours as forbidden, though 37 % allowed signing for others. While students rated themselves as moderate to completely honest, about 50 % admitted to occasional dishonest behaviours. Logistic regression revealed internal moral principles and self-concept as significant predictors of honest behaviour (R2 = 39.6 %; p < 0.05). Decision tree analysis revealed detailed relationships between internal moral principles, self-concept, and behavioural cataloguing in predicting honest and dishonest behaviours.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study uncovered a concerning gap between students' professed integrity and their actual dishonest behaviour during quizzes, showing an upward trend over time. This suggests complex influences shaping students' decisions. Observing peers' dishonesty may normalize such behaviour, fuelling its spread. Educational efforts should aim at bridging the gap between students' values and actions, employing methods that nurture practical skills related to integrity and promoting positive role models to foster a culture of honesty.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54704,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nurse Education Today\",\"volume\":\"147 \",\"pages\":\"106575\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nurse Education Today\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106575\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Education Today","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106575","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:学术不诚实在教育环境中构成了重大挑战,特别是在护理学生中。通过教学和技术方法缓解这一问题的努力取得了有限的成功。对学术不诚实的不同理论解释强调了进一步探索这一多方面现象的必要性。目的:本研究探讨了护生在面对面测验中的自我报告和实时观察的不诚实行为。设计:混合方法:自我报告和使用教室摄像机实时观察。环境:护理学术校园。研究对象:护理专业本科三年级学生(72人)。平均年龄27岁;75.5%为女性,18.4%为已婚。方法:数据收集分为三个阶段:研究前准备,课堂上的观察和测验后的自我报告。独立观察员进行观察以防止偏见。结果:观察发现,说话是最常见的不诚实行为,其次是偷看和打电话。新的不诚实行为包括抄试卷和在测试期间打电话。不诚实的行为在整个学期都有所增加,尤其是说话和偷看。问卷调查结果显示,大多数学生认为不诚实行为是被禁止的,尽管37%的学生允许为他人签名。虽然学生们认为自己是中等到完全诚实的,但大约50%的人承认偶尔有不诚实的行为。逻辑回归显示,内在道德原则和自我概念是诚实行为的显著预测因子(R2 = 39.6%;结论:该研究揭示了学生在测试中自称诚实和实际不诚实行为之间的一个令人担忧的差距,随着时间的推移,这个差距呈上升趋势。这表明影响学生决策的因素是复杂的。观察同伴的不诚实行为可能会使这种行为正常化,从而助长这种行为的蔓延。教育工作应旨在弥合学生的价值观和行为之间的差距,采用培养与诚信有关的实用技能的方法,并促进积极的榜样,以培养诚实的文化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Actual dishonest behaviour versus self-perception as an honest student: Real time observational and self-report study.

Background: Academic dishonesty poses significant challenges in educational settings, particularly among nursing students. Efforts to mitigate this issue through pedagogical and technological approaches have seen limited success. Diverse theoretical explanations for academic dishonesty underscore the need for further exploration of this multifaceted phenomenon.

Aim: This research explored self-reported and real-time observed dishonest behaviours among nursing students during in-person quizzes.

Design: Mixed methods: self-reporting and real-time observations using classroom cameras.

Settings: Nursing academic campus.

Participants: Third-year baccalaureate nursing students (n = 72). The mean age was 27 years; 75.5 % were female, and 18.4 % identified as married.

Methods: Data collection spanned three phases: pre-research preparation, in-class observations during quizzes, and post-quiz self-reporting. Independent observers conducted observations to prevent biases.

Results: Observations identified speaking as the most common dishonest activity, followed by peeking and phone use. New forms of dishonesty included copying from quiz sheets and making phone calls during quizzes. Dishonest activities increased over the semester, particularly speaking and peeking. Questionnaire responses showed most students viewed dishonest behaviours as forbidden, though 37 % allowed signing for others. While students rated themselves as moderate to completely honest, about 50 % admitted to occasional dishonest behaviours. Logistic regression revealed internal moral principles and self-concept as significant predictors of honest behaviour (R2 = 39.6 %; p < 0.05). Decision tree analysis revealed detailed relationships between internal moral principles, self-concept, and behavioural cataloguing in predicting honest and dishonest behaviours.

Conclusion: The study uncovered a concerning gap between students' professed integrity and their actual dishonest behaviour during quizzes, showing an upward trend over time. This suggests complex influences shaping students' decisions. Observing peers' dishonesty may normalize such behaviour, fuelling its spread. Educational efforts should aim at bridging the gap between students' values and actions, employing methods that nurture practical skills related to integrity and promoting positive role models to foster a culture of honesty.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nurse Education Today
Nurse Education Today 医学-护理
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
12.80%
发文量
349
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nurse Education Today is the leading international journal providing a forum for the publication of high quality original research, review and debate in the discussion of nursing, midwifery and interprofessional health care education, publishing papers which contribute to the advancement of educational theory and pedagogy that support the evidence-based practice for educationalists worldwide. The journal stimulates and values critical scholarly debate on issues that have strategic relevance for leaders of health care education. The journal publishes the highest quality scholarly contributions reflecting the diversity of people, health and education systems worldwide, by publishing research that employs rigorous methodology as well as by publishing papers that highlight the theoretical underpinnings of education and systems globally. The journal will publish papers that show depth, rigour, originality and high standards of presentation, in particular, work that is original, analytical and constructively critical of both previous work and current initiatives. Authors are invited to submit original research, systematic and scholarly reviews, and critical papers which will stimulate debate on research, policy, theory or philosophy of nursing and related health care education, and which will meet and develop the journal''s high academic and ethical standards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信