慢性踝关节不稳定的评估:功能评分是否足够相关?

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Alexandre Caubère, Chloé Viricel, Fabien Garcia-Jaldon, Sergio Afonso, Emilie Bilichtin, Camille Choufani, Olivier Barbier
{"title":"慢性踝关节不稳定的评估:功能评分是否足够相关?","authors":"Alexandre Caubère, Chloé Viricel, Fabien Garcia-Jaldon, Sergio Afonso, Emilie Bilichtin, Camille Choufani, Olivier Barbier","doi":"10.1016/j.otsr.2025.104167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A poorly treated acute ankle sprain can rapidly progress to chronic instability, with varying degrees of disability secondary to weakness of the ankle stabilizers. The aim of our study was to evaluate functional scores and physical tests in the assessment of eversion and proprioception deficits after non-surgical treatment of chronic ankle instability. Our hypothesis was that these functional scores and physical tests are suitable and sufficient for assessing the functional aspect of an unstable ankle.</p><p><strong>Material and method: </strong>This was a prospective, single-center study of patients managed for chronic ankle instability between November 2020 and November 2021. An ankle assessment was performed using two functional scores, the Foot Ankle Ability Measurement (FAAM) and the Ankle Ligament Reconstruction - Return to Sport after Injury (ALR-RSI), as well as two validated physical tests (Y-Balance Test and Side Hope Test). An objective (quantified) assessment of stabilizer muscle strength and proprioception was carried out using a connected device (Myolux™ Medik e-volution).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At last recoil, twenty-eight unstable ankles were included. Only the ALR-RSI score correlated strongly with Myolux™ assessment of eversion strength (Rho ()ρ = 0.7; p < 0.001), and proprioception (Rho ()ρ = 0.8; p < 0.001). FAAM and physical tests were not or only very moderately correlated with Myolux™ assessments.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In the absence of the Myolux™ test, the ALR-RSI score seemed the most suitable functional assessment of an unstable ankle in contrast to the FAAM score and the physical examinations Y-Balance Test and Side Hope Test.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>IV; prospective study.</p>","PeriodicalId":54664,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research","volume":" ","pages":"104167"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of chronic ankle instability: are functional scores relevant enough?\",\"authors\":\"Alexandre Caubère, Chloé Viricel, Fabien Garcia-Jaldon, Sergio Afonso, Emilie Bilichtin, Camille Choufani, Olivier Barbier\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.otsr.2025.104167\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A poorly treated acute ankle sprain can rapidly progress to chronic instability, with varying degrees of disability secondary to weakness of the ankle stabilizers. The aim of our study was to evaluate functional scores and physical tests in the assessment of eversion and proprioception deficits after non-surgical treatment of chronic ankle instability. Our hypothesis was that these functional scores and physical tests are suitable and sufficient for assessing the functional aspect of an unstable ankle.</p><p><strong>Material and method: </strong>This was a prospective, single-center study of patients managed for chronic ankle instability between November 2020 and November 2021. An ankle assessment was performed using two functional scores, the Foot Ankle Ability Measurement (FAAM) and the Ankle Ligament Reconstruction - Return to Sport after Injury (ALR-RSI), as well as two validated physical tests (Y-Balance Test and Side Hope Test). An objective (quantified) assessment of stabilizer muscle strength and proprioception was carried out using a connected device (Myolux™ Medik e-volution).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At last recoil, twenty-eight unstable ankles were included. Only the ALR-RSI score correlated strongly with Myolux™ assessment of eversion strength (Rho ()ρ = 0.7; p < 0.001), and proprioception (Rho ()ρ = 0.8; p < 0.001). FAAM and physical tests were not or only very moderately correlated with Myolux™ assessments.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In the absence of the Myolux™ test, the ALR-RSI score seemed the most suitable functional assessment of an unstable ankle in contrast to the FAAM score and the physical examinations Y-Balance Test and Side Hope Test.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>IV; prospective study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"104167\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2025.104167\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2025.104167","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

治疗不当的急性踝关节扭伤可迅速发展为慢性不稳定,并发不同程度的残疾,继发于踝关节稳定器的薄弱。本研究的目的是评估慢性踝关节不稳非手术治疗后外翻和本体感觉缺陷的功能评分和物理测试。我们的假设是,这些功能评分和物理测试适合并足以评估不稳定踝关节的功能方面。材料和方法:这是一项前瞻性、单中心研究,纳入了2020年11月至2021年11月期间治疗慢性踝关节不稳定的患者。踝关节评估采用两种功能评分,即足踝关节能力测量(FAAM)和踝关节韧带重建-损伤后恢复运动(ALR-RSI),以及两种有效的物理测试(Y-Balance测试和Side Hope测试)。使用连接设备(Myolux™Medik e-volution)对稳定肌力量和本体感觉进行客观(量化)评估。结果:最终纳入不稳定踝关节28例。只有ALR-RSI评分与Myolux™的外翻强度评估有很强的相关性(ρ = 0.7;p讨论:在没有Myolux™测试的情况下,与FAAM评分和体格检查Y-Balance测试和Side Hope测试相比,ALR-RSI评分似乎是对不稳定踝关节最合适的功能评估。证据等级:四级;前瞻性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of chronic ankle instability: are functional scores relevant enough?

Introduction: A poorly treated acute ankle sprain can rapidly progress to chronic instability, with varying degrees of disability secondary to weakness of the ankle stabilizers. The aim of our study was to evaluate functional scores and physical tests in the assessment of eversion and proprioception deficits after non-surgical treatment of chronic ankle instability. Our hypothesis was that these functional scores and physical tests are suitable and sufficient for assessing the functional aspect of an unstable ankle.

Material and method: This was a prospective, single-center study of patients managed for chronic ankle instability between November 2020 and November 2021. An ankle assessment was performed using two functional scores, the Foot Ankle Ability Measurement (FAAM) and the Ankle Ligament Reconstruction - Return to Sport after Injury (ALR-RSI), as well as two validated physical tests (Y-Balance Test and Side Hope Test). An objective (quantified) assessment of stabilizer muscle strength and proprioception was carried out using a connected device (Myolux™ Medik e-volution).

Results: At last recoil, twenty-eight unstable ankles were included. Only the ALR-RSI score correlated strongly with Myolux™ assessment of eversion strength (Rho ()ρ = 0.7; p < 0.001), and proprioception (Rho ()ρ = 0.8; p < 0.001). FAAM and physical tests were not or only very moderately correlated with Myolux™ assessments.

Discussion: In the absence of the Myolux™ test, the ALR-RSI score seemed the most suitable functional assessment of an unstable ankle in contrast to the FAAM score and the physical examinations Y-Balance Test and Side Hope Test.

Level of evidence: IV; prospective study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
26.10%
发文量
329
审稿时长
12.5 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research (OTSR) publishes original scientific work in English related to all domains of orthopaedics. Original articles, Reviews, Technical notes and Concise follow-up of a former OTSR study are published in English in electronic form only and indexed in the main international databases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信