Janna Sill, Katharina Silies, Angelika Schley, Steffen Fleischer, Martin Müller, Katrin Balzer
{"title":"[Covid-19大流行期间急诊医院护理优先级和定量决策:一项定性研究]。","authors":"Janna Sill, Katharina Silies, Angelika Schley, Steffen Fleischer, Martin Müller, Katrin Balzer","doi":"10.1024/1012-5302/a001028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nursing prioritization and rationing decisions in acute care hospitals during the Covid-19 pandemic: a qualitative study <b>Abstract:</b><i>Background:</i> The Covid-19 pandemic has put decisions regarding prioritization and rationing of care resources on the health policy agenda. The effects on the allocation of nursing resources in clinical practice are unclear. <i>Aim:</i> In order to derive implications for future pandemic situations, we analyzed the extent to which decisions were made about the distribution of resources in acute inpatient care and how bottlenecks were dealt with. <i>Methods:</i> We conducted semi-structured interviews with nursing staff (n = 16) and nursing team leaders (n = 10) in five acute-care clinics in Germany and analyzed them inductively using thematic framework analysis. <i>Results:</i> In acute inpatient care under pandemic conditions, prioritization and rationing decisions were made, such as the postponement or reduction of nursing measures, in order to overcome pandemic-specific challenges. These decisions affected certain patient groups and certain near- and distant-patient services, in particular fundamental care measures, such as support with personal hygiene and nutrition, as well as access to acute inpatient care. The decisions were made implicitly rather than according to evidence-based criteria. <i>Conclusions:</i> Nursing prioritization and rationing decisions were made during the pandemic. These decisions are similar to comparable decisions outside of the pandemic, particularly in terms of insufficient evidence base, and emphasize the need for empirically based decision criteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":54625,"journal":{"name":"Pflege","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Nursing prioritization and rationing decisions in acute care hospitals during the Covid-19 pandemic: a qualitative study].\",\"authors\":\"Janna Sill, Katharina Silies, Angelika Schley, Steffen Fleischer, Martin Müller, Katrin Balzer\",\"doi\":\"10.1024/1012-5302/a001028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Nursing prioritization and rationing decisions in acute care hospitals during the Covid-19 pandemic: a qualitative study <b>Abstract:</b><i>Background:</i> The Covid-19 pandemic has put decisions regarding prioritization and rationing of care resources on the health policy agenda. The effects on the allocation of nursing resources in clinical practice are unclear. <i>Aim:</i> In order to derive implications for future pandemic situations, we analyzed the extent to which decisions were made about the distribution of resources in acute inpatient care and how bottlenecks were dealt with. <i>Methods:</i> We conducted semi-structured interviews with nursing staff (n = 16) and nursing team leaders (n = 10) in five acute-care clinics in Germany and analyzed them inductively using thematic framework analysis. <i>Results:</i> In acute inpatient care under pandemic conditions, prioritization and rationing decisions were made, such as the postponement or reduction of nursing measures, in order to overcome pandemic-specific challenges. These decisions affected certain patient groups and certain near- and distant-patient services, in particular fundamental care measures, such as support with personal hygiene and nutrition, as well as access to acute inpatient care. The decisions were made implicitly rather than according to evidence-based criteria. <i>Conclusions:</i> Nursing prioritization and rationing decisions were made during the pandemic. These decisions are similar to comparable decisions outside of the pandemic, particularly in terms of insufficient evidence base, and emphasize the need for empirically based decision criteria.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54625,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pflege\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pflege\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1024/1012-5302/a001028\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pflege","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1024/1012-5302/a001028","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Nursing prioritization and rationing decisions in acute care hospitals during the Covid-19 pandemic: a qualitative study].
Nursing prioritization and rationing decisions in acute care hospitals during the Covid-19 pandemic: a qualitative study Abstract:Background: The Covid-19 pandemic has put decisions regarding prioritization and rationing of care resources on the health policy agenda. The effects on the allocation of nursing resources in clinical practice are unclear. Aim: In order to derive implications for future pandemic situations, we analyzed the extent to which decisions were made about the distribution of resources in acute inpatient care and how bottlenecks were dealt with. Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with nursing staff (n = 16) and nursing team leaders (n = 10) in five acute-care clinics in Germany and analyzed them inductively using thematic framework analysis. Results: In acute inpatient care under pandemic conditions, prioritization and rationing decisions were made, such as the postponement or reduction of nursing measures, in order to overcome pandemic-specific challenges. These decisions affected certain patient groups and certain near- and distant-patient services, in particular fundamental care measures, such as support with personal hygiene and nutrition, as well as access to acute inpatient care. The decisions were made implicitly rather than according to evidence-based criteria. Conclusions: Nursing prioritization and rationing decisions were made during the pandemic. These decisions are similar to comparable decisions outside of the pandemic, particularly in terms of insufficient evidence base, and emphasize the need for empirically based decision criteria.
期刊介绍:
Pflege ist die erste unabhängige wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift für die Gesundheits- und Krankenpflege im deutschen Sprachbereich. Sie trägt zur Entwicklung der Pflegewissenschaft sowie zur Qualität der Pflege in der Praxis bei. Die Zeitschrift versteht sich als umfassendes Forum, in welchem die sich rasch entwickelnden Bereiche der Pflegeforschung, -theorie und -praxis sowie der Ausbildung, des Managements, der Ethik, Geschichte und Politik der Pflege diskutiert werden können. Zusammenfassungen von Forschungsberichten und Mitteilungen aus der internationalen Pflegeszene, Buchbesprechungen und der internationale Kongresskalender ermöglichen der Leserschaft, sich einen Überblick über das aktuelle Geschehen zu verschaffen, sich bezüglich berufsspezifischer Literatur auf dem Laufenden zu halten, um somit die Weiterbildung gezielt zu gestalten. Pflege publiziert Beiträge, die eine hohe Relevanz für Praxis, Forschung, Theorie, Ausbildung, Ethik, Geschichte, Politik und das Management in der Pflege im deutschsprachigen Raum haben. Manuskripte ohne Bezug zur Pflege im deutschsprachigen Raum werden abgelehnt.