新生儿复发性外周静脉置管:一个病例系列。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Stephanie Hall, Emily Larsen, Linda Cobbald, Nicole Marsh, Linda McLaughlin, Mari Takashima, Robert S Ware, Amanda Ulman, Deanne August
{"title":"新生儿复发性外周静脉置管:一个病例系列。","authors":"Stephanie Hall, Emily Larsen, Linda Cobbald, Nicole Marsh, Linda McLaughlin, Mari Takashima, Robert S Ware, Amanda Ulman, Deanne August","doi":"10.1111/nicc.13232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Neonatal peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVCs) can be difficult to insert, often requiring multiple attempts, with each attempt causing pain and delaying treatment. The aim of this study was describe the clinical characteristics of neonates requiring multiple PIVCs during hospitalization. A secondary case series of neonates requiring three or more PIVCs during their admission were identified from a cohort admitted to an Australian Neonatal Unit between October 2020 and February 2021. Data were collected at PIVC insertion and removal; with variables including patient characteristics (weight, gestational age, acuity) and device characteristics (treatment indication, location), and outcomes (completion of treatment or failure). Outcomes are reported descriptively. In total, 19 of 248 (7.6%) neonates received three or more PIVCs (n = 101 PIVCs). Median gestation and weight were 26.6 weeks (interquartile-range [IQR] 24.6-28.6 weeks) and 728 grams (IQR 640-1050 g), respectively; all neonates required intensive care admission. The most common anatomical location was the hand (41.5%, n = 42). The maximum number of PIVCs required by a single patient was 12. The median dwell time was 49 h (IQR 35.0-73.5 h), with maximum dwell 263 h. In total, 57% (n=58/101 PIVCs) failed from complications, and 58% (n=59) of failed PIVCs required re-insertion. Despite common clinician perceptions that large babies require more PIVCs, our results found extremely low birth weight babies required frequent cannulation, with many PIVCs failing prior to treatment completion. There is a need for further investigation regarding decision-making, advanced inserter skills and optimization of alternate vascular access device selection for this vulnerable population. Clinical teams caring for neonates, particularly those of low birth weight and/or gestation, are recommended to take extra time considering the device they choose to insert, and the inserting clinicians. The aim of these recommendations is to reduce the number of treatment failures and device complications causing preventable treatment delays and ongoing injuries in neonatal critical care.</p>","PeriodicalId":51264,"journal":{"name":"Nursing in Critical Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recurrent peripheral intravenous catheterization in neonates: A case series.\",\"authors\":\"Stephanie Hall, Emily Larsen, Linda Cobbald, Nicole Marsh, Linda McLaughlin, Mari Takashima, Robert S Ware, Amanda Ulman, Deanne August\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/nicc.13232\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Neonatal peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVCs) can be difficult to insert, often requiring multiple attempts, with each attempt causing pain and delaying treatment. The aim of this study was describe the clinical characteristics of neonates requiring multiple PIVCs during hospitalization. A secondary case series of neonates requiring three or more PIVCs during their admission were identified from a cohort admitted to an Australian Neonatal Unit between October 2020 and February 2021. Data were collected at PIVC insertion and removal; with variables including patient characteristics (weight, gestational age, acuity) and device characteristics (treatment indication, location), and outcomes (completion of treatment or failure). Outcomes are reported descriptively. In total, 19 of 248 (7.6%) neonates received three or more PIVCs (n = 101 PIVCs). Median gestation and weight were 26.6 weeks (interquartile-range [IQR] 24.6-28.6 weeks) and 728 grams (IQR 640-1050 g), respectively; all neonates required intensive care admission. The most common anatomical location was the hand (41.5%, n = 42). The maximum number of PIVCs required by a single patient was 12. The median dwell time was 49 h (IQR 35.0-73.5 h), with maximum dwell 263 h. In total, 57% (n=58/101 PIVCs) failed from complications, and 58% (n=59) of failed PIVCs required re-insertion. Despite common clinician perceptions that large babies require more PIVCs, our results found extremely low birth weight babies required frequent cannulation, with many PIVCs failing prior to treatment completion. There is a need for further investigation regarding decision-making, advanced inserter skills and optimization of alternate vascular access device selection for this vulnerable population. Clinical teams caring for neonates, particularly those of low birth weight and/or gestation, are recommended to take extra time considering the device they choose to insert, and the inserting clinicians. The aim of these recommendations is to reduce the number of treatment failures and device complications causing preventable treatment delays and ongoing injuries in neonatal critical care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51264,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing in Critical Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing in Critical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.13232\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing in Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.13232","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

新生儿外周静脉导管(pivc)很难插入,通常需要多次尝试,每次尝试都会引起疼痛并延迟治疗。本研究的目的是描述住院期间需要多次pivc的新生儿的临床特征。从2020年10月至2021年2月期间入住澳大利亚新生儿病房的队列中确定了入院期间需要三次或更多次pivc的新生儿的第二个病例系列。在PIVC插入和移除时收集数据;变量包括患者特征(体重、胎龄、敏锐度)、器械特征(治疗指征、位置)和结果(治疗完成或失败)。结果报告是描述性的。248例新生儿中有19例(7.6%)接受了三次或三次以上的pivc(101例)。中位妊娠期和体重分别为26.6周(四分位间距[IQR] 24.6-28.6周)和728克(IQR 640-1050克);所有新生儿都需要重症监护。最常见的解剖位置是手部(41.5%,n = 42)。单个患者所需的pivc最多为12次。平均停留时间为49 h (IQR为35.0 ~ 73.5 h),最长停留时间为263 h。总共有57% (n=58/101)的pivc因并发症失败,58% (n=59)的pivc失败后需要重新插入。尽管临床医生普遍认为大婴儿需要更多的pivc,但我们的研究结果发现,极低出生体重的婴儿需要频繁插管,许多pivc在治疗完成前失败。有必要进一步研究决策,先进的插入技术和优化替代血管通路装置的选择,为这一弱势群体。临床团队照顾新生儿,特别是那些低出生体重和/或妊娠,建议花额外的时间考虑他们选择插入的设备,以及插入的临床医生。这些建议的目的是减少治疗失败和设备并发症的数量,导致可预防的治疗延误和新生儿重症监护的持续伤害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Recurrent peripheral intravenous catheterization in neonates: A case series.

Neonatal peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVCs) can be difficult to insert, often requiring multiple attempts, with each attempt causing pain and delaying treatment. The aim of this study was describe the clinical characteristics of neonates requiring multiple PIVCs during hospitalization. A secondary case series of neonates requiring three or more PIVCs during their admission were identified from a cohort admitted to an Australian Neonatal Unit between October 2020 and February 2021. Data were collected at PIVC insertion and removal; with variables including patient characteristics (weight, gestational age, acuity) and device characteristics (treatment indication, location), and outcomes (completion of treatment or failure). Outcomes are reported descriptively. In total, 19 of 248 (7.6%) neonates received three or more PIVCs (n = 101 PIVCs). Median gestation and weight were 26.6 weeks (interquartile-range [IQR] 24.6-28.6 weeks) and 728 grams (IQR 640-1050 g), respectively; all neonates required intensive care admission. The most common anatomical location was the hand (41.5%, n = 42). The maximum number of PIVCs required by a single patient was 12. The median dwell time was 49 h (IQR 35.0-73.5 h), with maximum dwell 263 h. In total, 57% (n=58/101 PIVCs) failed from complications, and 58% (n=59) of failed PIVCs required re-insertion. Despite common clinician perceptions that large babies require more PIVCs, our results found extremely low birth weight babies required frequent cannulation, with many PIVCs failing prior to treatment completion. There is a need for further investigation regarding decision-making, advanced inserter skills and optimization of alternate vascular access device selection for this vulnerable population. Clinical teams caring for neonates, particularly those of low birth weight and/or gestation, are recommended to take extra time considering the device they choose to insert, and the inserting clinicians. The aim of these recommendations is to reduce the number of treatment failures and device complications causing preventable treatment delays and ongoing injuries in neonatal critical care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
109
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing in Critical Care is an international peer-reviewed journal covering any aspect of critical care nursing practice, research, education or management. Critical care nursing is defined as the whole spectrum of skills, knowledge and attitudes utilised by practitioners in any setting where adults or children, and their families, are experiencing acute and critical illness. Such settings encompass general and specialist hospitals, and the community. Nursing in Critical Care covers the diverse specialities of critical care nursing including surgery, medicine, cardiac, renal, neurosciences, haematology, obstetrics, accident and emergency, neonatal nursing and paediatrics. Papers published in the journal normally fall into one of the following categories: -research reports -literature reviews -developments in practice, education or management -reflections on practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信