60-75岁患者的瓣膜保留与生物本特尔主动脉根置换:生存、再干预和主动脉反流。

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Alessandra Sala, Michele Di Mauro, Edoardo Zancanaro, Marta Bargagna, Francesco Grimaldi, Veronica D'Oria, Lorenzo Menicanti, Ottavio Alfieri, Michele De Bonis, Carlo de Vincentiis
{"title":"60-75岁患者的瓣膜保留与生物本特尔主动脉根置换:生存、再干预和主动脉反流。","authors":"Alessandra Sala, Michele Di Mauro, Edoardo Zancanaro, Marta Bargagna, Francesco Grimaldi, Veronica D'Oria, Lorenzo Menicanti, Ottavio Alfieri, Michele De Bonis, Carlo de Vincentiis","doi":"10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.12.028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Valve-sparing root replacement(VSRR) with the David technique is an established therapy for aortic root pathology in young patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate short and long-term outcomes between VSRR and aortic root replacement(ARR) with a biological-valved conduit in sexagenarians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multicenter retrospective review from 2002-2022 identified 299-sexagenarians undergoing aortic root surgery, among whom 82(27.4%) underwent VSRR and 217(72.6%) bio-Bentall. Inverse probability of treatment weighting(IPTW) was applied to balance clinical variables. Median follow-up was 15-years[12-18 years]. Endpoints of the study were in-hospital mortality, long-term survival, freedom from reintervention and recurrence of at-least-moderate AR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no major differences in baseline characteristics. The incidence of bicuspid valves(VSRR 4.9% vs ARR 19%), severe AR(42% vs 51%), type-A aortic dissection(1.2% vs 6.9%), and reoperation(4% vs 23%) were higher in ARR. Following IPTW, there was no difference in in-hospital mortality(VSRR 1.2% vs ARR 4.6%,p=0.3). The incidence of neurologic complications(p=0.003), and permanent pacemaker(PPM) implantation(p=0.022) were significantly higher in the bio-Bentall group. After IPTW, 10-year survival did not differ between VSRR(87%) and ARR(80%)(p=0.176). However, cardiac-survival was significantly higher in VSRR patients(98% vs 92%,p=0.018), with deaths mainly due to infective endocarditis and end-stage heart failure(HF). Regarding reoperation/recurrence of at-least-moderate AR, no difference was reported among groups at 10-years, with only 1-patient undergoing reintervention following bio-Bentall(p=0.117).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>David and bio-Bentall procedures have low in-hospital mortality and good long-term survival in sexagenarians. VSRR is associated with improved long-term cardiac-survival, lower rates of infective endocarditis, PPM-implantation and HF-episodes, with similar rates of reintervention/recurrence of moderate AR.</p>","PeriodicalId":50976,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Thoracic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Valve-sparing versus bio-Bentall aortic root replacement in patients aged 60-75 years: Survival, Reintervention and Aortic Regurgitation.\",\"authors\":\"Alessandra Sala, Michele Di Mauro, Edoardo Zancanaro, Marta Bargagna, Francesco Grimaldi, Veronica D'Oria, Lorenzo Menicanti, Ottavio Alfieri, Michele De Bonis, Carlo de Vincentiis\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.12.028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Valve-sparing root replacement(VSRR) with the David technique is an established therapy for aortic root pathology in young patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate short and long-term outcomes between VSRR and aortic root replacement(ARR) with a biological-valved conduit in sexagenarians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multicenter retrospective review from 2002-2022 identified 299-sexagenarians undergoing aortic root surgery, among whom 82(27.4%) underwent VSRR and 217(72.6%) bio-Bentall. Inverse probability of treatment weighting(IPTW) was applied to balance clinical variables. Median follow-up was 15-years[12-18 years]. Endpoints of the study were in-hospital mortality, long-term survival, freedom from reintervention and recurrence of at-least-moderate AR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no major differences in baseline characteristics. The incidence of bicuspid valves(VSRR 4.9% vs ARR 19%), severe AR(42% vs 51%), type-A aortic dissection(1.2% vs 6.9%), and reoperation(4% vs 23%) were higher in ARR. Following IPTW, there was no difference in in-hospital mortality(VSRR 1.2% vs ARR 4.6%,p=0.3). The incidence of neurologic complications(p=0.003), and permanent pacemaker(PPM) implantation(p=0.022) were significantly higher in the bio-Bentall group. After IPTW, 10-year survival did not differ between VSRR(87%) and ARR(80%)(p=0.176). However, cardiac-survival was significantly higher in VSRR patients(98% vs 92%,p=0.018), with deaths mainly due to infective endocarditis and end-stage heart failure(HF). Regarding reoperation/recurrence of at-least-moderate AR, no difference was reported among groups at 10-years, with only 1-patient undergoing reintervention following bio-Bentall(p=0.117).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>David and bio-Bentall procedures have low in-hospital mortality and good long-term survival in sexagenarians. VSRR is associated with improved long-term cardiac-survival, lower rates of infective endocarditis, PPM-implantation and HF-episodes, with similar rates of reintervention/recurrence of moderate AR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50976,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Thoracic Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Thoracic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.12.028\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Thoracic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.12.028","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:David技术保留主动脉根置换术(VSRR)是治疗年轻患者主动脉根病变的一种成熟的治疗方法。本研究的目的是评估60岁老人VSRR与生物瓣膜导管主动脉根部置换术(ARR)的短期和长期结果。方法:2002-2022年的一项多中心回顾性研究发现299名60岁老人接受了主动脉根部手术,其中82名(27.4%)接受了VSRR, 217名(72.6%)接受了bio-Bentall。应用治疗加权逆概率(IPTW)来平衡临床变量。中位随访时间为15年[12-18年]。研究的终点是住院死亡率、长期生存率、无再干预和至少中度ar的复发。结果:基线特征无显著差异。双尖瓣发生率(VSRR为4.9%,ARR为19%)、严重AR(42%, ARR为51%)、a型主动脉夹层(1.2%,ARR为6.9%)和再手术发生率(4%,ARR为23%)在ARR中较高。IPTW后,两组住院死亡率无差异(VSRR 1.2% vs ARR 4.6%,p=0.3)。生物本特尔组神经系统并发症发生率(p=0.003)和永久起搏器(PPM)植入率(p=0.022)显著高于生物本特尔组。IPTW后,VSRR(87%)和ARR(80%)的10年生存率无差异(p=0.176)。然而,VSRR患者的心脏生存率明显更高(98% vs 92%,p=0.018),死亡主要是由于感染性心内膜炎和终末期心力衰竭(HF)。关于至少中度AR的再手术/复发,10年时各组间无差异报道,只有1例患者在bio-Bentall后进行了再干预(p=0.117)。结论:David和bio-Bentall手术在60岁老人中具有低住院死亡率和良好的长期生存率。VSRR与改善长期心脏生存、降低感染性心内膜炎、ppm植入和hf发作的发生率相关,与中度AR的再干预/复发率相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Valve-sparing versus bio-Bentall aortic root replacement in patients aged 60-75 years: Survival, Reintervention and Aortic Regurgitation.

Background: Valve-sparing root replacement(VSRR) with the David technique is an established therapy for aortic root pathology in young patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate short and long-term outcomes between VSRR and aortic root replacement(ARR) with a biological-valved conduit in sexagenarians.

Methods: A multicenter retrospective review from 2002-2022 identified 299-sexagenarians undergoing aortic root surgery, among whom 82(27.4%) underwent VSRR and 217(72.6%) bio-Bentall. Inverse probability of treatment weighting(IPTW) was applied to balance clinical variables. Median follow-up was 15-years[12-18 years]. Endpoints of the study were in-hospital mortality, long-term survival, freedom from reintervention and recurrence of at-least-moderate AR.

Results: There were no major differences in baseline characteristics. The incidence of bicuspid valves(VSRR 4.9% vs ARR 19%), severe AR(42% vs 51%), type-A aortic dissection(1.2% vs 6.9%), and reoperation(4% vs 23%) were higher in ARR. Following IPTW, there was no difference in in-hospital mortality(VSRR 1.2% vs ARR 4.6%,p=0.3). The incidence of neurologic complications(p=0.003), and permanent pacemaker(PPM) implantation(p=0.022) were significantly higher in the bio-Bentall group. After IPTW, 10-year survival did not differ between VSRR(87%) and ARR(80%)(p=0.176). However, cardiac-survival was significantly higher in VSRR patients(98% vs 92%,p=0.018), with deaths mainly due to infective endocarditis and end-stage heart failure(HF). Regarding reoperation/recurrence of at-least-moderate AR, no difference was reported among groups at 10-years, with only 1-patient undergoing reintervention following bio-Bentall(p=0.117).

Conclusions: David and bio-Bentall procedures have low in-hospital mortality and good long-term survival in sexagenarians. VSRR is associated with improved long-term cardiac-survival, lower rates of infective endocarditis, PPM-implantation and HF-episodes, with similar rates of reintervention/recurrence of moderate AR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Thoracic Surgery
Annals of Thoracic Surgery 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
13.00%
发文量
1235
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: The mission of The Annals of Thoracic Surgery is to promote scholarship in cardiothoracic surgery patient care, clinical practice, research, education, and policy. As the official journal of two of the largest American associations in its specialty, this leading monthly enjoys outstanding editorial leadership and maintains rigorous selection standards. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery features: • Full-length original articles on clinical advances, current surgical methods, and controversial topics and techniques • New Technology articles • Case reports • "How-to-do-it" features • Reviews of current literature • Supplements on symposia • Commentary pieces and correspondence • CME • Online-only case reports, "how-to-do-its", and images in cardiothoracic surgery. An authoritative, clinically oriented, comprehensive resource, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery is committed to providing a place for all thoracic surgeons to relate experiences which will help improve patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信