持续改善降低急诊科病人在治疗完成前离开的比率。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Charli Landis, Sarah Kirschling, Nancy M Albert
{"title":"持续改善降低急诊科病人在治疗完成前离开的比率。","authors":"Charli Landis, Sarah Kirschling, Nancy M Albert","doi":"10.1016/j.jen.2024.12.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In hospital-based emergency departments, the national average of left before treatment complete was 2%. In addition, patients may leave without being seen or against medical advice and elope after arriving to the emergency department. When events occurred, they were associated with an increased length of stay for patients who were admitted to the hospital and decreased patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a 24-bed emergency department within a small rural hospital that is part of a large quaternary care health care system, a multidisciplinary team used a continuous improvement model and nursing and medical caregivers to implement a clustered intervention to decrease the frequency of patients leaving before treatment was completed. After completing summary statistics, logistic regression was performed to assess left before treatment complete rates in 2021 and 2022. Sensitivity analysis was performed using Poisson log-linear regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 45,814 emergency visits (July to December 2021, 15,600; January to December 2022, 30,214), 3097 patients (6.76%) left before treatment complete, left before being seen, left against medical advice, or eloped. When comparing rates before and after countermeasures were introduced, the odds of leaving before a final disposition was made was 354% higher pre- vs postcountermeasure implementation (odds ratio [95% confidence interval], 4.54 [4.2-4.91], P < .001). In sensitivity analyses that regressed the rate of left before treatment complete over the 2 years, the odds ratio was similar (4.07 [2.92-5.67], P < .001).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Using a continuous improvement framework and nursing caregiver-based countermeasures, the rate of leaving before final disposition was dramatically reduced. Team involvement in action planning and change processes was critical to successful outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":51082,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Continuous Improvement Decreases Emergency Department Patients Leaving Before Treatment Complete Rates.\",\"authors\":\"Charli Landis, Sarah Kirschling, Nancy M Albert\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jen.2024.12.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In hospital-based emergency departments, the national average of left before treatment complete was 2%. In addition, patients may leave without being seen or against medical advice and elope after arriving to the emergency department. When events occurred, they were associated with an increased length of stay for patients who were admitted to the hospital and decreased patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a 24-bed emergency department within a small rural hospital that is part of a large quaternary care health care system, a multidisciplinary team used a continuous improvement model and nursing and medical caregivers to implement a clustered intervention to decrease the frequency of patients leaving before treatment was completed. After completing summary statistics, logistic regression was performed to assess left before treatment complete rates in 2021 and 2022. Sensitivity analysis was performed using Poisson log-linear regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 45,814 emergency visits (July to December 2021, 15,600; January to December 2022, 30,214), 3097 patients (6.76%) left before treatment complete, left before being seen, left against medical advice, or eloped. When comparing rates before and after countermeasures were introduced, the odds of leaving before a final disposition was made was 354% higher pre- vs postcountermeasure implementation (odds ratio [95% confidence interval], 4.54 [4.2-4.91], P < .001). In sensitivity analyses that regressed the rate of left before treatment complete over the 2 years, the odds ratio was similar (4.07 [2.92-5.67], P < .001).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Using a continuous improvement framework and nursing caregiver-based countermeasures, the rate of leaving before final disposition was dramatically reduced. Team involvement in action planning and change processes was critical to successful outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51082,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Emergency Nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Emergency Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2024.12.007\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2024.12.007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在医院急诊科,全国平均治疗完成前离开率为2%。此外,患者可能在未被看到或不顾医嘱的情况下离开,并在到达急诊科后逃跑。当事件发生时,它们与入院患者住院时间的延长和患者满意度的降低有关。方法:在一家小型农村医院的24张床位急诊科,该医院是大型四级医疗保健系统的一部分,一个多学科团队使用持续改进模型和护理和医疗护理人员实施聚类干预,以减少患者在治疗完成前离开的频率。完成汇总统计后,进行logistic回归评估2021年和2022年治疗前剩余完成率。采用泊松对数线性回归进行敏感性分析。结果:在45,814次急诊就诊中(2021年7月至12月,15,600次;2022年1月至12月,30214例患者未完成治疗就离开,未见诊就离开,不遵医嘱离开,或私奔,3097例(6.76%)。当比较对策实施前后的比率时,在最终处置做出之前离开的几率比实施对策前后高354%(优势比[95%置信区间],4.54 [4.2-4.91],P < .001)。在敏感性分析中,回归治疗前2年的左侧完成率,优势比相似(4.07 [2.92-5.67],P < 0.001)。讨论:使用持续改进框架和基于护理人员的对策,在最终处置之前离开的比率显着降低。团队参与行动计划和变革过程是取得成功的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Continuous Improvement Decreases Emergency Department Patients Leaving Before Treatment Complete Rates.

Introduction: In hospital-based emergency departments, the national average of left before treatment complete was 2%. In addition, patients may leave without being seen or against medical advice and elope after arriving to the emergency department. When events occurred, they were associated with an increased length of stay for patients who were admitted to the hospital and decreased patient satisfaction.

Methods: In a 24-bed emergency department within a small rural hospital that is part of a large quaternary care health care system, a multidisciplinary team used a continuous improvement model and nursing and medical caregivers to implement a clustered intervention to decrease the frequency of patients leaving before treatment was completed. After completing summary statistics, logistic regression was performed to assess left before treatment complete rates in 2021 and 2022. Sensitivity analysis was performed using Poisson log-linear regression.

Results: Of 45,814 emergency visits (July to December 2021, 15,600; January to December 2022, 30,214), 3097 patients (6.76%) left before treatment complete, left before being seen, left against medical advice, or eloped. When comparing rates before and after countermeasures were introduced, the odds of leaving before a final disposition was made was 354% higher pre- vs postcountermeasure implementation (odds ratio [95% confidence interval], 4.54 [4.2-4.91], P < .001). In sensitivity analyses that regressed the rate of left before treatment complete over the 2 years, the odds ratio was similar (4.07 [2.92-5.67], P < .001).

Discussion: Using a continuous improvement framework and nursing caregiver-based countermeasures, the rate of leaving before final disposition was dramatically reduced. Team involvement in action planning and change processes was critical to successful outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
11.80%
发文量
132
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Emergency Nursing, the official journal of the Emergency Nurses Association (ENA), is committed to the dissemination of high quality, peer-reviewed manuscripts relevant to all areas of emergency nursing practice across the lifespan. Journal content includes clinical topics, integrative or systematic literature reviews, research, and practice improvement initiatives that provide emergency nurses globally with implications for translation of new knowledge into practice. The Journal also includes focused sections such as case studies, pharmacology/toxicology, injury prevention, trauma, triage, quality and safety, pediatrics and geriatrics. The Journal aims to mirror the goal of ENA to promote: community, governance and leadership, knowledge, quality and safety, and advocacy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信