健康青年感觉运动脑震荡评估的重测信度和可靠变化估计。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION
Gregory C Edwards, Alex E Bruggeman, Nick Fogt, James A Onate, Rebecca A Bliss, Catherine C Quatman-Yates, Jaclyn B Caccese
{"title":"健康青年感觉运动脑震荡评估的重测信度和可靠变化估计。","authors":"Gregory C Edwards, Alex E Bruggeman, Nick Fogt, James A Onate, Rebecca A Bliss, Catherine C Quatman-Yates, Jaclyn B Caccese","doi":"10.1123/jsr.2024-0275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Sensorimotor impairments are common sequela following concussion, but recovery following a concussion is often determined through examiner scored clinical testing. There are emerging technologies that provide objective methods to determine physiological impairment after concussion, but the psychometrics of these tools are lacking and must be established for use in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to examine the test-retest reliability and provide reliable change estimates in healthy young adults for outcomes from 3 emerging technologies providing objective assessments of sensorimotor function in healthy young adults.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Test-retest reliability design in a laboratory setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Healthy, young adults completed testing at 2 time points 4 weeks apart on the Bertec Vision Trainer, the Concussion Balance Test (COBALT), and the Neurolign Dx-100 eye-tracking system. We determined test-retest reliability using intraclass correlation coefficients with a 2-way mixed-effects model absolute agreement. Reliable change estimates were calculated for 70%, 80%, 90%, and 95% CIs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants included 30 healthy young adults (age = 25 [5] y, interquartile range = 20-29; range = 18-38; 17% [57%] women). Test-retest reliability for the Bertec Vision Trainer outcomes ranged from 0.56 to 0.88, with 45% of the outcomes being classified as clinically acceptable (>.70 intraclass correlation coefficients ); for COBALT conditions, sway velocity ranged from 0.50 to 0.95, 95% ellipse area ranged from -0.22 to 0.88, and Sway Score ranged from 0.07 to 0.85, with 50% of COBALT metrics being clinically acceptable; and for the Dx-100, outcomes ranged from -0.20 to 0.89, with 52% being clinically acceptable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, test-retest reliability was moderate-to-good for the Bertec Vision Trainer assessment outcomes but were highly variable for outcomes of postural control using the COBALT and eye-tracking metrics using the Dx-100. This study adds clinically relevant test-retest reliability and reliable change estimates in healthy adults for 3 commercially available sensorimotor assessments.</p>","PeriodicalId":50041,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sport Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Test-Retest Reliability and Reliable Change Estimates for Sensorimotor Concussion Assessments in Healthy Young Adults.\",\"authors\":\"Gregory C Edwards, Alex E Bruggeman, Nick Fogt, James A Onate, Rebecca A Bliss, Catherine C Quatman-Yates, Jaclyn B Caccese\",\"doi\":\"10.1123/jsr.2024-0275\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Sensorimotor impairments are common sequela following concussion, but recovery following a concussion is often determined through examiner scored clinical testing. There are emerging technologies that provide objective methods to determine physiological impairment after concussion, but the psychometrics of these tools are lacking and must be established for use in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to examine the test-retest reliability and provide reliable change estimates in healthy young adults for outcomes from 3 emerging technologies providing objective assessments of sensorimotor function in healthy young adults.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Test-retest reliability design in a laboratory setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Healthy, young adults completed testing at 2 time points 4 weeks apart on the Bertec Vision Trainer, the Concussion Balance Test (COBALT), and the Neurolign Dx-100 eye-tracking system. We determined test-retest reliability using intraclass correlation coefficients with a 2-way mixed-effects model absolute agreement. Reliable change estimates were calculated for 70%, 80%, 90%, and 95% CIs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants included 30 healthy young adults (age = 25 [5] y, interquartile range = 20-29; range = 18-38; 17% [57%] women). Test-retest reliability for the Bertec Vision Trainer outcomes ranged from 0.56 to 0.88, with 45% of the outcomes being classified as clinically acceptable (>.70 intraclass correlation coefficients ); for COBALT conditions, sway velocity ranged from 0.50 to 0.95, 95% ellipse area ranged from -0.22 to 0.88, and Sway Score ranged from 0.07 to 0.85, with 50% of COBALT metrics being clinically acceptable; and for the Dx-100, outcomes ranged from -0.20 to 0.89, with 52% being clinically acceptable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, test-retest reliability was moderate-to-good for the Bertec Vision Trainer assessment outcomes but were highly variable for outcomes of postural control using the COBALT and eye-tracking metrics using the Dx-100. This study adds clinically relevant test-retest reliability and reliable change estimates in healthy adults for 3 commercially available sensorimotor assessments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sport Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sport Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2024-0275\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sport Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2024-0275","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:感觉运动障碍是脑震荡后常见的后遗症,但脑震荡后的恢复通常是通过考官评分的临床测试来确定的。有一些新兴的技术可以提供客观的方法来确定脑震荡后的生理损伤,但是这些工具的心理测量学是缺乏的,必须建立在临床实践中使用。目的:本研究的目的是检验三种新兴技术对健康年轻人感觉运动功能的客观评估结果的重测信度,并提供可靠的变化估计。设计:实验室环境下的重测可靠性设计。方法:健康的年轻人在间隔4周的2个时间点完成Bertec视力训练器、脑震荡平衡测试(COBALT)和Neurolign Dx-100眼动追踪系统的测试。我们使用类内相关系数和双向混合效应模型确定重测信度。为70%、80%、90%和95% ci计算可靠的变更估计。结果:参与者包括30名健康的年轻人(年龄= 25岁,四分位数范围= 20-29;范围= 18-38;17%[57%]女性)。Bertec视力训练器结果的重测信度范围为0.56至0.88,45%的结果被归类为临床可接受(>)。70个类内相关系数);对于钴条件,摇摆速度范围为0.50至0.95,95%椭圆面积范围为-0.22至0.88,摇摆评分范围为0.07至0.85,其中50%的钴指标临床可接受;Dx-100的结果范围为-0.20 - 0.89,52%临床可接受。结论:总体而言,Bertec Vision Trainer评估结果的重测信度为中等至良好,但使用COBALT的姿势控制结果和使用Dx-100的眼动追踪指标的结果变化很大。本研究为3种市售的感觉运动评估增加了临床相关的重测信度和健康成人的可靠变化估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Test-Retest Reliability and Reliable Change Estimates for Sensorimotor Concussion Assessments in Healthy Young Adults.

Context: Sensorimotor impairments are common sequela following concussion, but recovery following a concussion is often determined through examiner scored clinical testing. There are emerging technologies that provide objective methods to determine physiological impairment after concussion, but the psychometrics of these tools are lacking and must be established for use in clinical practice.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine the test-retest reliability and provide reliable change estimates in healthy young adults for outcomes from 3 emerging technologies providing objective assessments of sensorimotor function in healthy young adults.

Design: Test-retest reliability design in a laboratory setting.

Methods: Healthy, young adults completed testing at 2 time points 4 weeks apart on the Bertec Vision Trainer, the Concussion Balance Test (COBALT), and the Neurolign Dx-100 eye-tracking system. We determined test-retest reliability using intraclass correlation coefficients with a 2-way mixed-effects model absolute agreement. Reliable change estimates were calculated for 70%, 80%, 90%, and 95% CIs.

Results: Participants included 30 healthy young adults (age = 25 [5] y, interquartile range = 20-29; range = 18-38; 17% [57%] women). Test-retest reliability for the Bertec Vision Trainer outcomes ranged from 0.56 to 0.88, with 45% of the outcomes being classified as clinically acceptable (>.70 intraclass correlation coefficients ); for COBALT conditions, sway velocity ranged from 0.50 to 0.95, 95% ellipse area ranged from -0.22 to 0.88, and Sway Score ranged from 0.07 to 0.85, with 50% of COBALT metrics being clinically acceptable; and for the Dx-100, outcomes ranged from -0.20 to 0.89, with 52% being clinically acceptable.

Conclusions: Overall, test-retest reliability was moderate-to-good for the Bertec Vision Trainer assessment outcomes but were highly variable for outcomes of postural control using the COBALT and eye-tracking metrics using the Dx-100. This study adds clinically relevant test-retest reliability and reliable change estimates in healthy adults for 3 commercially available sensorimotor assessments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Sport Rehabilitation
Journal of Sport Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
143
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sport Rehabilitation (JSR) is your source for the latest peer-reviewed research in the field of sport rehabilitation. All members of the sports-medicine team will benefit from the wealth of important information in each issue. JSR is completely devoted to the rehabilitation of sport and exercise injuries, regardless of the age, gender, sport ability, level of fitness, or health status of the participant. JSR publishes peer-reviewed original research, systematic reviews/meta-analyses, critically appraised topics (CATs), case studies/series, and technical reports that directly affect the management and rehabilitation of injuries incurred during sport-related activities, irrespective of the individual’s age, gender, sport ability, level of fitness, or health status. The journal is intended to provide an international, multidisciplinary forum to serve the needs of all members of the sports medicine team, including athletic trainers/therapists, sport physical therapists/physiotherapists, sports medicine physicians, and other health care and medical professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信