Joyce Weeland, Amaranta de Haan, Stephen Scott, Maria João Seabra-Santos, Carolyn Webster-Stratton, Sinéad McGilloway, Walter Matthys, Maria Filomena Gaspar, Margiad Elen Williams, Willy Tore Mørch, Ulf Axberg, Maartje Raaijmakers, Patty Leijten
{"title":"探索家庭概况,以解释育儿计划参与和有效性的异质性。","authors":"Joyce Weeland, Amaranta de Haan, Stephen Scott, Maria João Seabra-Santos, Carolyn Webster-Stratton, Sinéad McGilloway, Walter Matthys, Maria Filomena Gaspar, Margiad Elen Williams, Willy Tore Mørch, Ulf Axberg, Maartje Raaijmakers, Patty Leijten","doi":"10.1037/fam0001275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Parenting programs have proven effective in reducing disruptive child behavior. However, not all families benefit equally, and, to date, we have little insight into who benefits more or less and why. One possible solution is to explore how different potential moderators cluster together in individual families and whether such family profiles predict who benefits more or less from these programs. This study explores (a) how family, child, and parenting risk factors for disruptive behavior cluster together in families enrolled in the popular and evidence-based Incredible Years Parenting Program using latent profile analyses; (b) how family profiles relate to covariate family characteristics; and (c) whether profiles predict program engagement (i.e., number of sessions attended by caregivers) and effectiveness of (i.e., pre-post changes in disruptive behavior). Individual participant data from six studies across four countries (Norway, the Netherlands, England, Portugal) were used, including a total sample of 772 families with children aged 2.5-9 years (<i>M</i> = 5.14; <i>SD</i> = 1.10; 58.0% boys). Families could be profiled into a low- and high-risk profile, which differed on most child and family (but not parenting) risk factors as well as on covariate family characteristics, such as severity of disruptive behavior. Profile membership predicted engagement in, but not effectiveness of, the program. These findings provide useful insights into the heterogeneity in families participating in parenting programs, although there is a need for further research on how such differences may relate to differences in program effectiveness. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48381,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"121-136"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring family profiles in explaining heterogeneity in parenting program engagement and effectiveness.\",\"authors\":\"Joyce Weeland, Amaranta de Haan, Stephen Scott, Maria João Seabra-Santos, Carolyn Webster-Stratton, Sinéad McGilloway, Walter Matthys, Maria Filomena Gaspar, Margiad Elen Williams, Willy Tore Mørch, Ulf Axberg, Maartje Raaijmakers, Patty Leijten\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/fam0001275\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Parenting programs have proven effective in reducing disruptive child behavior. However, not all families benefit equally, and, to date, we have little insight into who benefits more or less and why. One possible solution is to explore how different potential moderators cluster together in individual families and whether such family profiles predict who benefits more or less from these programs. This study explores (a) how family, child, and parenting risk factors for disruptive behavior cluster together in families enrolled in the popular and evidence-based Incredible Years Parenting Program using latent profile analyses; (b) how family profiles relate to covariate family characteristics; and (c) whether profiles predict program engagement (i.e., number of sessions attended by caregivers) and effectiveness of (i.e., pre-post changes in disruptive behavior). Individual participant data from six studies across four countries (Norway, the Netherlands, England, Portugal) were used, including a total sample of 772 families with children aged 2.5-9 years (<i>M</i> = 5.14; <i>SD</i> = 1.10; 58.0% boys). Families could be profiled into a low- and high-risk profile, which differed on most child and family (but not parenting) risk factors as well as on covariate family characteristics, such as severity of disruptive behavior. Profile membership predicted engagement in, but not effectiveness of, the program. These findings provide useful insights into the heterogeneity in families participating in parenting programs, although there is a need for further research on how such differences may relate to differences in program effectiveness. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48381,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Family Psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"121-136\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Family Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0001275\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0001275","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
育儿计划已被证明在减少破坏性儿童行为方面是有效的。然而,并不是所有的家庭都同样受益,而且,到目前为止,我们对谁受益更多或更少以及原因知之甚少。一个可能的解决方案是探索不同的潜在调节者如何在单个家庭中聚集在一起,以及这些家庭概况是否能预测谁从这些项目中受益或少。本研究探讨了(a)家庭、孩子和父母的破坏性行为的风险因素如何在家庭中聚集在一起,这些家庭参加了受欢迎的、以证据为基础的“不可思议的岁月”育儿计划;(b)家庭概况与协变量家庭特征的关系;(c)档案是否预测项目参与(即,照顾者参加的会议数量)和有效性(即,破坏性行为的前后变化)。使用了来自四个国家(挪威、荷兰、英国、葡萄牙)的六项研究的个体参与者数据,包括772个有2.5-9岁儿童的家庭(M = 5.14;Sd = 1.10;58.0%的男孩)。家庭可以被分为低风险和高风险两类,这在大多数儿童和家庭(但不是养育子女)风险因素以及协变量家庭特征(如破坏性行为的严重程度)上有所不同。个人档案会员资格预测了该计划的参与度,而不是有效性。这些发现为参与育儿计划的家庭的异质性提供了有用的见解,尽管还需要进一步研究这些差异与计划有效性的差异之间的关系。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
Exploring family profiles in explaining heterogeneity in parenting program engagement and effectiveness.
Parenting programs have proven effective in reducing disruptive child behavior. However, not all families benefit equally, and, to date, we have little insight into who benefits more or less and why. One possible solution is to explore how different potential moderators cluster together in individual families and whether such family profiles predict who benefits more or less from these programs. This study explores (a) how family, child, and parenting risk factors for disruptive behavior cluster together in families enrolled in the popular and evidence-based Incredible Years Parenting Program using latent profile analyses; (b) how family profiles relate to covariate family characteristics; and (c) whether profiles predict program engagement (i.e., number of sessions attended by caregivers) and effectiveness of (i.e., pre-post changes in disruptive behavior). Individual participant data from six studies across four countries (Norway, the Netherlands, England, Portugal) were used, including a total sample of 772 families with children aged 2.5-9 years (M = 5.14; SD = 1.10; 58.0% boys). Families could be profiled into a low- and high-risk profile, which differed on most child and family (but not parenting) risk factors as well as on covariate family characteristics, such as severity of disruptive behavior. Profile membership predicted engagement in, but not effectiveness of, the program. These findings provide useful insights into the heterogeneity in families participating in parenting programs, although there is a need for further research on how such differences may relate to differences in program effectiveness. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
Journal of Family Psychology offers cutting-edge, groundbreaking, state-of-the-art, and innovative empirical research with real-world applicability in the field of family psychology. This premiere family research journal is devoted to the study of the family system, broadly defined, from multiple perspectives and to the application of psychological methods to advance knowledge related to family research, patterns and processes, and assessment and intervention, as well as to policies relevant to advancing the quality of life for families.