儿科医生和家庭医生对将有社会问题的病人转介到非医疗服务的观点——横断调查。

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Sinah Evers, Thomas Kloppe, Ansgar Gerhardus
{"title":"儿科医生和家庭医生对将有社会问题的病人转介到非医疗服务的观点——横断调查。","authors":"Sinah Evers, Thomas Kloppe, Ansgar Gerhardus","doi":"10.1055/a-2518-8609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Physicians in primary care practices encounter social problems among their patients on a daily basis. Physicians can refer these patients to social services to improve their health and reduce pressure on the health care system. Open questions remain about how these referral practices are carried out and what areas have potential for improvement.An online survey with 21 closed or open-ended questions was conducted among primary care physicians (general practitioners and paediatricians) in Bremen, Germany. Data from closed questions were analysed for frequency distributions, while responses to open-ended questions were coded and interpreted using qualitative content analysis.Out of 580 primary care physicians in Bremen, 45 (8%) participated in the survey. Most of the respondents considered it important to be able to refer patients to support services outside the medical care system. Physicians referred a median of 10% of patients for whom they identified a need for social support. The most common reasons for not referring patients included a lack of knowledge about available services or the absence of such services, as well as time constraints. A total of 33 physicians (73%) reported feeling highly burdened when unable to refer patients. Furthermore, 34 respondents (76%) anticipated that a central contact point for social issues would greatly improve their job satisfaction. More general practitioners than paediatricians considered support services related to finances, unemployment, and housing to be important, while paediatricians were more open to providing external social support services in their own practices or using a \"Gesundheitskiosk\" (health kiosk).This is the first study to compare general practitioners and paediatricians regarding social issues in patient care. Given the low response rate, the results should be interpreted with caution. Notably, physicians reported that they did not refer most patients with identified social needs and experienced this as a burden. The majority indicated that, if available, they would use various forms of collaboration with social services.</p>","PeriodicalId":47653,"journal":{"name":"Gesundheitswesen","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Primary care physicians' perspectives on the referral of patients with social problems to non-medical services - a cross-sectional survey].\",\"authors\":\"Sinah Evers, Thomas Kloppe, Ansgar Gerhardus\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2518-8609\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Physicians in primary care practices encounter social problems among their patients on a daily basis. Physicians can refer these patients to social services to improve their health and reduce pressure on the health care system. Open questions remain about how these referral practices are carried out and what areas have potential for improvement.An online survey with 21 closed or open-ended questions was conducted among primary care physicians (general practitioners and paediatricians) in Bremen, Germany. Data from closed questions were analysed for frequency distributions, while responses to open-ended questions were coded and interpreted using qualitative content analysis.Out of 580 primary care physicians in Bremen, 45 (8%) participated in the survey. Most of the respondents considered it important to be able to refer patients to support services outside the medical care system. Physicians referred a median of 10% of patients for whom they identified a need for social support. The most common reasons for not referring patients included a lack of knowledge about available services or the absence of such services, as well as time constraints. A total of 33 physicians (73%) reported feeling highly burdened when unable to refer patients. Furthermore, 34 respondents (76%) anticipated that a central contact point for social issues would greatly improve their job satisfaction. More general practitioners than paediatricians considered support services related to finances, unemployment, and housing to be important, while paediatricians were more open to providing external social support services in their own practices or using a \\\"Gesundheitskiosk\\\" (health kiosk).This is the first study to compare general practitioners and paediatricians regarding social issues in patient care. Given the low response rate, the results should be interpreted with caution. Notably, physicians reported that they did not refer most patients with identified social needs and experienced this as a burden. The majority indicated that, if available, they would use various forms of collaboration with social services.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47653,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gesundheitswesen\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gesundheitswesen\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2518-8609\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gesundheitswesen","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2518-8609","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

初级保健实践的医生每天都会遇到患者之间的社会问题。医生可以将这些患者转介到社会服务机构,以改善他们的健康状况,减轻医疗保健系统的压力。关于如何实施这些转诊做法以及哪些领域有改进的潜力,仍然存在悬而未决的问题。在德国不来梅的初级保健医生(全科医生和儿科医生)中进行了一项包含21个封闭式或开放式问题的在线调查。对封闭式问题的数据进行频率分布分析,而对开放式问题的回答进行编码,并使用定性内容分析进行解释。在不来梅580名初级保健医生中,有45名(8%)参加了调查。大多数受访者认为,能够将患者转介到医疗保健系统之外的支持服务非常重要。在医生认为需要社会支持的病人中,平均有10%被转诊。不转诊患者的最常见原因包括缺乏对现有服务的了解或缺乏此类服务,以及时间限制。共有33名医生(73%)报告说,当无法转诊病人时,他们感到负担沉重。此外,34名受访者(76%)预计社会问题的中心联络点将大大提高他们的工作满意度。与儿科医生相比,更多的全科医生认为与财务、失业和住房有关的支持服务很重要,而儿科医生更愿意在自己的诊所或使用“Gesundheitskiosk”(保健亭)提供外部社会支持服务。这是第一个比较全科医生和儿科医生在病人护理方面的社会问题的研究。考虑到低回复率,应该谨慎解释结果。值得注意的是,医生报告说,他们没有转诊大多数有明确社会需求的患者,并认为这是一种负担。大多数代表团表示,如果有机会,它们将利用与社会服务机构合作的各种形式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Primary care physicians' perspectives on the referral of patients with social problems to non-medical services - a cross-sectional survey].

Physicians in primary care practices encounter social problems among their patients on a daily basis. Physicians can refer these patients to social services to improve their health and reduce pressure on the health care system. Open questions remain about how these referral practices are carried out and what areas have potential for improvement.An online survey with 21 closed or open-ended questions was conducted among primary care physicians (general practitioners and paediatricians) in Bremen, Germany. Data from closed questions were analysed for frequency distributions, while responses to open-ended questions were coded and interpreted using qualitative content analysis.Out of 580 primary care physicians in Bremen, 45 (8%) participated in the survey. Most of the respondents considered it important to be able to refer patients to support services outside the medical care system. Physicians referred a median of 10% of patients for whom they identified a need for social support. The most common reasons for not referring patients included a lack of knowledge about available services or the absence of such services, as well as time constraints. A total of 33 physicians (73%) reported feeling highly burdened when unable to refer patients. Furthermore, 34 respondents (76%) anticipated that a central contact point for social issues would greatly improve their job satisfaction. More general practitioners than paediatricians considered support services related to finances, unemployment, and housing to be important, while paediatricians were more open to providing external social support services in their own practices or using a "Gesundheitskiosk" (health kiosk).This is the first study to compare general practitioners and paediatricians regarding social issues in patient care. Given the low response rate, the results should be interpreted with caution. Notably, physicians reported that they did not refer most patients with identified social needs and experienced this as a burden. The majority indicated that, if available, they would use various forms of collaboration with social services.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gesundheitswesen
Gesundheitswesen PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
18.20%
发文量
308
期刊介绍: The health service informs you comprehensively and up-to-date about the most important topics of the health care system. In addition to guidelines, overviews and comments, you will find current research results and contributions to CME-certified continuing education and training. The journal offers a scientific discussion forum and a platform for communications from professional societies. The content quality is ensured by a publisher body, the expert advisory board and other experts in the peer review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信