Jesus Gonzalez-Moreno, Gema Soria-Urios, Encarnacion Satorres, Juan C Meléndez
{"title":"中度阿尔茨海默氏症执行功能和注意力训练的传统方法与技术方法比较。","authors":"Jesus Gonzalez-Moreno, Gema Soria-Urios, Encarnacion Satorres, Juan C Meléndez","doi":"10.70478/psicothema.2025.37.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Background: This study investigates the effects of cognitive interventions on executive functions and attention in patients with moderate Alzheimer's, comparing traditional and technology-based methods with a control group.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 112 participants, divided into three groups: traditional intervention, technology-based intervention, and control group. Sixteen sessions were carried out, assessed using standardized tests and applying hierarchical linear mixed models to adjust for confounding factors and random effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The interventions proved effective in improving executive functions. The model for backward digits and categorical fluency was optimized with MMSE scores, highlighting the benefits of good cognitive performance and the negative impacts of age on categorical fluency. The similarity-abstraction variable demonstrated the beneficial effects of education and cognitive performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cognitive training is a valuable tool for improving executive functions and attention in moderate Alzheimer's, indicating significant practical benefits. Future research should focus on the mechanisms of skill transfer to optimize interventions and improve the quality of life for those affected.</p>","PeriodicalId":48179,"journal":{"name":"Psicothema","volume":"37 1","pages":"42-49"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing Traditional and Technology-Based Methods for Executive Function and Attention Training in Moderate Alzheimer's Dementia.\",\"authors\":\"Jesus Gonzalez-Moreno, Gema Soria-Urios, Encarnacion Satorres, Juan C Meléndez\",\"doi\":\"10.70478/psicothema.2025.37.05\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Background: This study investigates the effects of cognitive interventions on executive functions and attention in patients with moderate Alzheimer's, comparing traditional and technology-based methods with a control group.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 112 participants, divided into three groups: traditional intervention, technology-based intervention, and control group. Sixteen sessions were carried out, assessed using standardized tests and applying hierarchical linear mixed models to adjust for confounding factors and random effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The interventions proved effective in improving executive functions. The model for backward digits and categorical fluency was optimized with MMSE scores, highlighting the benefits of good cognitive performance and the negative impacts of age on categorical fluency. The similarity-abstraction variable demonstrated the beneficial effects of education and cognitive performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cognitive training is a valuable tool for improving executive functions and attention in moderate Alzheimer's, indicating significant practical benefits. Future research should focus on the mechanisms of skill transfer to optimize interventions and improve the quality of life for those affected.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48179,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psicothema\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"42-49\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psicothema\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.70478/psicothema.2025.37.05\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psicothema","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.70478/psicothema.2025.37.05","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparing Traditional and Technology-Based Methods for Executive Function and Attention Training in Moderate Alzheimer's Dementia.
Background: Background: This study investigates the effects of cognitive interventions on executive functions and attention in patients with moderate Alzheimer's, comparing traditional and technology-based methods with a control group.
Method: A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 112 participants, divided into three groups: traditional intervention, technology-based intervention, and control group. Sixteen sessions were carried out, assessed using standardized tests and applying hierarchical linear mixed models to adjust for confounding factors and random effects.
Results: The interventions proved effective in improving executive functions. The model for backward digits and categorical fluency was optimized with MMSE scores, highlighting the benefits of good cognitive performance and the negative impacts of age on categorical fluency. The similarity-abstraction variable demonstrated the beneficial effects of education and cognitive performance.
Conclusions: Cognitive training is a valuable tool for improving executive functions and attention in moderate Alzheimer's, indicating significant practical benefits. Future research should focus on the mechanisms of skill transfer to optimize interventions and improve the quality of life for those affected.
期刊介绍：
La revista Psicothema fue fundada en Asturias en 1989 y está editada conjuntamente por la Facultad y el Departamento de Psicología de la Universidad de Oviedo y el Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos del Principado de Asturias. Publica cuatro números al año. Se admiten trabajos tanto de investigación básica como aplicada, pertenecientes a cualquier ámbito de la Psicología, que previamente a su publicación son evaluados anónimamente por revisores externos. Psicothema está incluida en las bases de datos nacionales e internacionales más relevantes, entre las que cabe destacar Psychological Abstracts, Current Contents y MEDLINE/Index Medicus, entre otras. Además, figura en las listas de Factor de Impacto del Journal Citation Reports. Psicothema es una revista abierta a cualquier enfoque u orientación psicológica que venga avalada por la fuerza de los datos y los argumentos, y en la que encuentran acomodo todos los autores que sean capaces de convencer a los revisores de que sus manuscritos tienen la calidad para ser publicados. Psicothema es una revista de acceso abierto lo que significa que todo el contenido está a disposición de cualquier usuario o institución sin cargo alguno. Los usuarios pueden leer, descargar, copiar, distribuir, imprimir, buscar, o realizar enlaces a los textos completos de esta revista sin pedir permiso previo al editor o al autor, siempre y cuando la fuente original sea referenciada. Para acervos y repositorios, se prefiere que la cobertura se realice mediante enlaces a la propia web de Psicothema. Nos parece que una apuesta decidida por la calidad es el mejor modo de servir a nuestros lectores, cuyas sugerencias siempre serán bienvenidas.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
