采用参与式方法确定优先事项,以推进LHS在学术医疗中心的实施。

IF 2.6 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Reid M. Eagleson, Madeline Gibson, Carletta Dobbins, Frederick Van Pelt, Allyson Hall, Larry Hearld, Andrea L. Cherrington, Jacob McMahon, Keith Tony Jones, Michael J. Mugavero
{"title":"采用参与式方法确定优先事项,以推进LHS在学术医疗中心的实施。","authors":"Reid M. Eagleson,&nbsp;Madeline Gibson,&nbsp;Carletta Dobbins,&nbsp;Frederick Van Pelt,&nbsp;Allyson Hall,&nbsp;Larry Hearld,&nbsp;Andrea L. Cherrington,&nbsp;Jacob McMahon,&nbsp;Keith Tony Jones,&nbsp;Michael J. Mugavero","doi":"10.1002/lrh2.10431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Like many other academic medical centers, the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) aspires to adopt learning health system (LHS) principles and practices more fully. Applying LHS principles establishes a culture where clinical and operational practices constantly generate questions and leverage information technology (IT) and methodological expertise to facilitate systematic evaluation of care delivery, health outcomes, and the effects of improvement initiatives. Despite the potential benefits, differences in priorities, timelines, and expectations spanning an academic medical center's clinical care, administrative operations, and research arms create barriers to adopting and implementing an LHS.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>UAB's Center for Outcomes and Effectiveness Research and Education, in partnership with UAB Medicine's Department of Clinical Practice Transformation, applied part of the Precision Problem Solving methodology to advance the implementation of LHS principles at UAB.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Sixty-two stakeholders across the UAB health system and academic schools noted 131 concerns regarding the development of an LHS at UAB. From the 131 items, eight major themes were identified, named, and prioritized through a series of focus groups. Of the eight major themes, “Creating a Structure for Aligned and Informed Prioritization” and “Right Data, Right Time, Improved Performance” ranked in the top three most important themes across all focus groups and became the critical priorities as UAB enhances its LHS. A task force comprised of diverse constituents from across UAB's academic medical center is taking first steps toward addressing these priority areas. Initial funding supports a prototype for enhanced health system data access and pilot projects conducted by researchers embedded in health system teams.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>We suggest that our experience conducting a deliberate process with broad engagement across both the health system and academic arms of the university may be informative to others seeking to advance LHS principles at academic health centers across a myriad of settings.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":43916,"journal":{"name":"Learning Health Systems","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11733440/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using a participatory approach to identify priorities to advance LHS implementation at an academic medical center\",\"authors\":\"Reid M. Eagleson,&nbsp;Madeline Gibson,&nbsp;Carletta Dobbins,&nbsp;Frederick Van Pelt,&nbsp;Allyson Hall,&nbsp;Larry Hearld,&nbsp;Andrea L. Cherrington,&nbsp;Jacob McMahon,&nbsp;Keith Tony Jones,&nbsp;Michael J. Mugavero\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/lrh2.10431\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Like many other academic medical centers, the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) aspires to adopt learning health system (LHS) principles and practices more fully. Applying LHS principles establishes a culture where clinical and operational practices constantly generate questions and leverage information technology (IT) and methodological expertise to facilitate systematic evaluation of care delivery, health outcomes, and the effects of improvement initiatives. Despite the potential benefits, differences in priorities, timelines, and expectations spanning an academic medical center's clinical care, administrative operations, and research arms create barriers to adopting and implementing an LHS.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>UAB's Center for Outcomes and Effectiveness Research and Education, in partnership with UAB Medicine's Department of Clinical Practice Transformation, applied part of the Precision Problem Solving methodology to advance the implementation of LHS principles at UAB.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Sixty-two stakeholders across the UAB health system and academic schools noted 131 concerns regarding the development of an LHS at UAB. From the 131 items, eight major themes were identified, named, and prioritized through a series of focus groups. Of the eight major themes, “Creating a Structure for Aligned and Informed Prioritization” and “Right Data, Right Time, Improved Performance” ranked in the top three most important themes across all focus groups and became the critical priorities as UAB enhances its LHS. A task force comprised of diverse constituents from across UAB's academic medical center is taking first steps toward addressing these priority areas. Initial funding supports a prototype for enhanced health system data access and pilot projects conducted by researchers embedded in health system teams.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>We suggest that our experience conducting a deliberate process with broad engagement across both the health system and academic arms of the university may be informative to others seeking to advance LHS principles at academic health centers across a myriad of settings.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43916,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning Health Systems\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11733440/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning Health Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lrh2.10431\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning Health Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lrh2.10431","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:像许多其他学术医疗中心一样,阿拉巴马大学伯明翰分校(UAB)渴望更充分地采用学习型健康系统(LHS)的原则和实践。应用LHS原则建立了一种文化,在这种文化中,临床和操作实践不断产生问题,并利用信息技术(IT)和方法专业知识,促进对护理服务、健康结果和改进举措效果的系统评估。尽管有潜在的好处,但学术医疗中心的临床护理、行政操作和研究部门在优先级、时间表和期望方面的差异,为采用和实施LHS造成了障碍。方法:UAB的结果和有效性研究与教育中心与UAB医学临床实践转化部门合作,应用部分精确问题解决方法来推进LHS原则在UAB的实施。结果:UAB卫生系统和学术学院的62个利益相关者指出了131个关于UAB LHS发展的问题。从131个项目中,通过一系列焦点小组确定了8个主要主题,命名并确定了优先顺序。在八个主要主题中,“创建一个一致和知情的优先级结构”和“正确的数据,正确的时间,改进的性能”在所有焦点小组中排名前三,并成为UAB增强其LHS的关键优先事项。一个由来自UAB学术医学中心的不同成分组成的工作组正在采取第一步措施来解决这些优先领域。初始资金用于支持加强卫生系统数据获取的原型和由嵌入卫生系统团队的研究人员开展的试点项目。结论:我们建议,我们在整个卫生系统和大学学术部门广泛参与的过程中进行深思熟虑的经验可能会为其他寻求在无数环境中推进LHS原则的学术卫生中心提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Using a participatory approach to identify priorities to advance LHS implementation at an academic medical center

Using a participatory approach to identify priorities to advance LHS implementation at an academic medical center

Introduction

Like many other academic medical centers, the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) aspires to adopt learning health system (LHS) principles and practices more fully. Applying LHS principles establishes a culture where clinical and operational practices constantly generate questions and leverage information technology (IT) and methodological expertise to facilitate systematic evaluation of care delivery, health outcomes, and the effects of improvement initiatives. Despite the potential benefits, differences in priorities, timelines, and expectations spanning an academic medical center's clinical care, administrative operations, and research arms create barriers to adopting and implementing an LHS.

Methods

UAB's Center for Outcomes and Effectiveness Research and Education, in partnership with UAB Medicine's Department of Clinical Practice Transformation, applied part of the Precision Problem Solving methodology to advance the implementation of LHS principles at UAB.

Results

Sixty-two stakeholders across the UAB health system and academic schools noted 131 concerns regarding the development of an LHS at UAB. From the 131 items, eight major themes were identified, named, and prioritized through a series of focus groups. Of the eight major themes, “Creating a Structure for Aligned and Informed Prioritization” and “Right Data, Right Time, Improved Performance” ranked in the top three most important themes across all focus groups and became the critical priorities as UAB enhances its LHS. A task force comprised of diverse constituents from across UAB's academic medical center is taking first steps toward addressing these priority areas. Initial funding supports a prototype for enhanced health system data access and pilot projects conducted by researchers embedded in health system teams.

Conclusion

We suggest that our experience conducting a deliberate process with broad engagement across both the health system and academic arms of the university may be informative to others seeking to advance LHS principles at academic health centers across a myriad of settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Learning Health Systems
Learning Health Systems HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
22.60%
发文量
55
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信