剖宫产及其对子宫动脉阻力的影响及妊娠后患先兆子痫的风险。

Q2 Medicine
Neda Hashemi, Arash Mohazzab, Maryam Moshfeghi, Samaneh Rokhgireh, Roya Derakhshan, Nasrin Sanaei Nasab
{"title":"剖宫产及其对子宫动脉阻力的影响及妊娠后患先兆子痫的风险。","authors":"Neda Hashemi, Arash Mohazzab, Maryam Moshfeghi, Samaneh Rokhgireh, Roya Derakhshan, Nasrin Sanaei Nasab","doi":"10.18502/jri.v25i3.17015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of the current study was to compare the color Doppler findings of uterine arteries and perinatal outcomes in pregnant women with and without previous cesarean section (C/S).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cohort study enrolled 308 pregnant women aged 20-35 without underlying diseases, with at least one previous pregnancy and childbirth. The participants were divided into two groups: 154 women without C/S and 154 women with C/S. Baseline data were collected, followed by uterine artery Doppler scans. Then, the perinatal outcomes, including pre-eclampsia, intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), premature delivery, and birth weight were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average age of patients in the C/S group was 30.46±3.81, which was significantly higher than the non-C/S group (28.86±4.64). It was found that uterine artery resistance was higher in women with C/S history (1.11±0.44, p<0.001) compared to those without (1.00±0.37, p<0.001). Pre-eclampsia incidence was also higher in C/S group (16.1%, p=0.042) compared to non-C/S group (9.1%, p=0.042). The incidence of preterm birth in the C/S group (p=0.209), the incidence of IUGR (p=0.791), and the average birth weight (p=0.291) in the two groups did not differ significantly. The average gestational age in the C/S group was 37.54±1.4, and in the non-C/S group was 38.01±1.99 weeks. The results were not affected by potential confounders such as age, the time interval between pregnancies, and also body mass index.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Previous cesarean section can significantly increase the uterine artery resistance in subsequent pregnancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":38826,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Reproduction and Infertility","volume":"25 3","pages":"211-218"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11736266/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cesarean Section and Its Impact on Uterine Artery Resistance and the Risk of Pre-eclampsia in Subsequent Pregnancies.\",\"authors\":\"Neda Hashemi, Arash Mohazzab, Maryam Moshfeghi, Samaneh Rokhgireh, Roya Derakhshan, Nasrin Sanaei Nasab\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/jri.v25i3.17015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of the current study was to compare the color Doppler findings of uterine arteries and perinatal outcomes in pregnant women with and without previous cesarean section (C/S).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cohort study enrolled 308 pregnant women aged 20-35 without underlying diseases, with at least one previous pregnancy and childbirth. The participants were divided into two groups: 154 women without C/S and 154 women with C/S. Baseline data were collected, followed by uterine artery Doppler scans. Then, the perinatal outcomes, including pre-eclampsia, intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), premature delivery, and birth weight were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average age of patients in the C/S group was 30.46±3.81, which was significantly higher than the non-C/S group (28.86±4.64). It was found that uterine artery resistance was higher in women with C/S history (1.11±0.44, p<0.001) compared to those without (1.00±0.37, p<0.001). Pre-eclampsia incidence was also higher in C/S group (16.1%, p=0.042) compared to non-C/S group (9.1%, p=0.042). The incidence of preterm birth in the C/S group (p=0.209), the incidence of IUGR (p=0.791), and the average birth weight (p=0.291) in the two groups did not differ significantly. The average gestational age in the C/S group was 37.54±1.4, and in the non-C/S group was 38.01±1.99 weeks. The results were not affected by potential confounders such as age, the time interval between pregnancies, and also body mass index.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Previous cesarean section can significantly increase the uterine artery resistance in subsequent pregnancy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38826,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Reproduction and Infertility\",\"volume\":\"25 3\",\"pages\":\"211-218\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11736266/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Reproduction and Infertility\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/jri.v25i3.17015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Reproduction and Infertility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jri.v25i3.17015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究的目的是比较有和没有剖宫产史(C/S)的孕妇子宫动脉的彩色多普勒检查结果和围产期结局。方法:本队列研究招募了308名年龄在20-35岁之间、无基础疾病、至少有一次妊娠和分娩史的孕妇。参与者被分为两组:154名没有C/S的女性和154名有C/S的女性。收集基线数据,随后进行子宫动脉多普勒扫描。然后,评估围产期结局,包括先兆子痫、宫内生长受限(IUGR)、早产和出生体重。结果:C/S组患者平均年龄30.46±3.81岁,明显高于非C/S组(28.86±4.64岁)。发现有C/S病史的妇女子宫动脉阻力较高(1.11±0.44)。结论:既往剖宫产可显著增加妊娠后子宫动脉阻力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cesarean Section and Its Impact on Uterine Artery Resistance and the Risk of Pre-eclampsia in Subsequent Pregnancies.

Background: The purpose of the current study was to compare the color Doppler findings of uterine arteries and perinatal outcomes in pregnant women with and without previous cesarean section (C/S).

Methods: This cohort study enrolled 308 pregnant women aged 20-35 without underlying diseases, with at least one previous pregnancy and childbirth. The participants were divided into two groups: 154 women without C/S and 154 women with C/S. Baseline data were collected, followed by uterine artery Doppler scans. Then, the perinatal outcomes, including pre-eclampsia, intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), premature delivery, and birth weight were evaluated.

Results: The average age of patients in the C/S group was 30.46±3.81, which was significantly higher than the non-C/S group (28.86±4.64). It was found that uterine artery resistance was higher in women with C/S history (1.11±0.44, p<0.001) compared to those without (1.00±0.37, p<0.001). Pre-eclampsia incidence was also higher in C/S group (16.1%, p=0.042) compared to non-C/S group (9.1%, p=0.042). The incidence of preterm birth in the C/S group (p=0.209), the incidence of IUGR (p=0.791), and the average birth weight (p=0.291) in the two groups did not differ significantly. The average gestational age in the C/S group was 37.54±1.4, and in the non-C/S group was 38.01±1.99 weeks. The results were not affected by potential confounders such as age, the time interval between pregnancies, and also body mass index.

Conclusion: Previous cesarean section can significantly increase the uterine artery resistance in subsequent pregnancy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Reproduction and Infertility
Journal of Reproduction and Infertility Medicine-Reproductive Medicine
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信