274例椎体隆胸术中导航系统的辐射暴露分析。

IF 1.7 Q2 SURGERY
Mehdi Boudissa, Gaël Kerschbaumer, Guillaume Cavalié, Jean-François Desrousseaux, Alexis Perrin, Georges Naïm Abi Lahoud, Julien Decaudain, Amélie Léglise, John Sledge, Benjamin Bénac, Jérémy Ouali, Jérôme Tonetti
{"title":"274例椎体隆胸术中导航系统的辐射暴露分析。","authors":"Mehdi Boudissa, Gaël Kerschbaumer, Guillaume Cavalié, Jean-François Desrousseaux, Alexis Perrin, Georges Naïm Abi Lahoud, Julien Decaudain, Amélie Léglise, John Sledge, Benjamin Bénac, Jérémy Ouali, Jérôme Tonetti","doi":"10.14444/8701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgeons' reliance on intraoperative fluoroscopy during vertebroplasty procedures has raised concerns regarding the level of patient and surgeon radiation. Navigation systems have shown a potential to reduce the overall patient and medical staff exposure during dose exposure studies. The main objective of this study was to determine whether the Surgivisio platform (eCential Robotics, France), a unified imaging and navigation platform, lowers the patient dose during routine clinical usage as compared with published fluoroscopy and other navigation options that are published in the literature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To accomplish this, we evaluated the radiation exposure dose during routine vertebroplasty procedures in which the surgeon was not trying to limit radiation and then compared the results to best-case dose assessment studies. Since a decreased radiation dose can lead to decreased image quality, we also quantified the surgeon's perception of image quality and ease of use. Two hundred and seventy-four Surgivisio-assisted vertebral augmentations were pooled from a broader 1694-patient protocol (not focusing on radiation outcomes) and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We measured a median dose-area product and effective dose equal to 3.47 Gy.cm² and 0.81 mSv. The 3-dimensional image acquisitions contributed to 56.3% of the total dose-area product. When screening the literature, fluoroscopy dose levels (8.37-15.1 Gy.cm²) and navigation dose levels (9.12-9.83 Gy.cm²) were generally higher than those delivered with the Surgivisio protocol. Surgeon satisfaction for image quality and overall system experience was 95.8% and 85% for ease of use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Surgivisio platform provided surgeons with high-quality images and ease of use. Since the surgeon is out of the room during the 3-dimensional image acquisition, this also substantially decreased their radiation exposure. This study demonstrates the efficiency of the Surgivisio platform to assist surgeons during vertebral augmentations, as the reported radiation levels are reduced in routine cases compared with published scenarios reported for other guidance methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":38486,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Spine Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Radiation Exposure Analysis on 274 Patients With Vertebral Augmentation Using the Surgivisio Intraoperative Navigation System.\",\"authors\":\"Mehdi Boudissa, Gaël Kerschbaumer, Guillaume Cavalié, Jean-François Desrousseaux, Alexis Perrin, Georges Naïm Abi Lahoud, Julien Decaudain, Amélie Léglise, John Sledge, Benjamin Bénac, Jérémy Ouali, Jérôme Tonetti\",\"doi\":\"10.14444/8701\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgeons' reliance on intraoperative fluoroscopy during vertebroplasty procedures has raised concerns regarding the level of patient and surgeon radiation. Navigation systems have shown a potential to reduce the overall patient and medical staff exposure during dose exposure studies. The main objective of this study was to determine whether the Surgivisio platform (eCential Robotics, France), a unified imaging and navigation platform, lowers the patient dose during routine clinical usage as compared with published fluoroscopy and other navigation options that are published in the literature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To accomplish this, we evaluated the radiation exposure dose during routine vertebroplasty procedures in which the surgeon was not trying to limit radiation and then compared the results to best-case dose assessment studies. Since a decreased radiation dose can lead to decreased image quality, we also quantified the surgeon's perception of image quality and ease of use. Two hundred and seventy-four Surgivisio-assisted vertebral augmentations were pooled from a broader 1694-patient protocol (not focusing on radiation outcomes) and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We measured a median dose-area product and effective dose equal to 3.47 Gy.cm² and 0.81 mSv. The 3-dimensional image acquisitions contributed to 56.3% of the total dose-area product. When screening the literature, fluoroscopy dose levels (8.37-15.1 Gy.cm²) and navigation dose levels (9.12-9.83 Gy.cm²) were generally higher than those delivered with the Surgivisio protocol. Surgeon satisfaction for image quality and overall system experience was 95.8% and 85% for ease of use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Surgivisio platform provided surgeons with high-quality images and ease of use. Since the surgeon is out of the room during the 3-dimensional image acquisition, this also substantially decreased their radiation exposure. This study demonstrates the efficiency of the Surgivisio platform to assist surgeons during vertebral augmentations, as the reported radiation levels are reduced in routine cases compared with published scenarios reported for other guidance methods.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38486,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Spine Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Spine Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14444/8701\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Spine Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14444/8701","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:椎体成形术中外科医生对术中透视检查的依赖引起了对患者和外科医生放射水平的关注。在剂量暴露研究中,导航系统显示出降低患者和医务人员总体暴露的潜力。本研究的主要目的是确定Surgivisio平台(eCential Robotics, France),一个统一的成像和导航平台,与文献中发表的透视检查和其他导航选项相比,是否在常规临床使用中降低了患者的剂量。方法:为了实现这一目标,我们评估了常规椎体成形术中外科医生不试图限制辐射的辐射暴露剂量,然后将结果与最佳病例剂量评估研究进行比较。由于降低的辐射剂量会导致图像质量下降,我们也量化了外科医生对图像质量和易用性的感知。从更广泛的1694例患者方案(不关注放射结果)中汇总了274例手术视觉辅助椎体增强术并进行了分析。结果:测得中位剂量面积积和有效剂量为3.47 Gy。cm²和0.81 mSv。三维图像采集占总剂量面积产品的56.3%。在筛选文献时,透视剂量水平(8.37-15.1 Gy.cm²)和导航剂量水平(9.12-9.83 Gy.cm²)普遍高于Surgivisio方案。外科医生对图像质量和整体系统体验的满意度为95.8%,对易用性的满意度为85%。结论:Surgivisio平台为外科医生提供了高质量的图像和易用性。由于外科医生在三维图像采集期间不在房间,这也大大减少了他们的辐射暴露。本研究证明了Surgivisio平台在椎体增强术中辅助外科医生的有效性,因为与其他已发表的指导方法相比,报道的常规病例的辐射水平降低了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Radiation Exposure Analysis on 274 Patients With Vertebral Augmentation Using the Surgivisio Intraoperative Navigation System.

Background: Surgeons' reliance on intraoperative fluoroscopy during vertebroplasty procedures has raised concerns regarding the level of patient and surgeon radiation. Navigation systems have shown a potential to reduce the overall patient and medical staff exposure during dose exposure studies. The main objective of this study was to determine whether the Surgivisio platform (eCential Robotics, France), a unified imaging and navigation platform, lowers the patient dose during routine clinical usage as compared with published fluoroscopy and other navigation options that are published in the literature.

Methods: To accomplish this, we evaluated the radiation exposure dose during routine vertebroplasty procedures in which the surgeon was not trying to limit radiation and then compared the results to best-case dose assessment studies. Since a decreased radiation dose can lead to decreased image quality, we also quantified the surgeon's perception of image quality and ease of use. Two hundred and seventy-four Surgivisio-assisted vertebral augmentations were pooled from a broader 1694-patient protocol (not focusing on radiation outcomes) and analyzed.

Results: We measured a median dose-area product and effective dose equal to 3.47 Gy.cm² and 0.81 mSv. The 3-dimensional image acquisitions contributed to 56.3% of the total dose-area product. When screening the literature, fluoroscopy dose levels (8.37-15.1 Gy.cm²) and navigation dose levels (9.12-9.83 Gy.cm²) were generally higher than those delivered with the Surgivisio protocol. Surgeon satisfaction for image quality and overall system experience was 95.8% and 85% for ease of use.

Conclusions: The Surgivisio platform provided surgeons with high-quality images and ease of use. Since the surgeon is out of the room during the 3-dimensional image acquisition, this also substantially decreased their radiation exposure. This study demonstrates the efficiency of the Surgivisio platform to assist surgeons during vertebral augmentations, as the reported radiation levels are reduced in routine cases compared with published scenarios reported for other guidance methods.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
162
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Spine Surgery is the official scientific journal of ISASS, the International Intradiscal Therapy Society, the Pittsburgh Spine Summit, and the Büttner-Janz Spinefoundation, and is an official partner of the Southern Neurosurgical Society. The goal of the International Journal of Spine Surgery is to promote and disseminate online the most up-to-date scientific and clinical research into innovations in motion preservation and new spinal surgery technology, including basic science, biologics, and tissue engineering. The Journal is dedicated to educating spine surgeons worldwide by reporting on the scientific basis, indications, surgical techniques, complications, outcomes, and follow-up data for promising spinal procedures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信