改善多种精神和身体健康状况的协同管理:设计激发患者价值观的技术服务的定性研究。

Q1 Social Sciences
William Wibowo Liem, Emily G Lattie, Bayley J Taple, Caitlin A Stamatis, Jacob Gordon, Rachel Kornfield, Andrew B L Berry
{"title":"改善多种精神和身体健康状况的协同管理:设计激发患者价值观的技术服务的定性研究。","authors":"William Wibowo Liem, Emily G Lattie, Bayley J Taple, Caitlin A Stamatis, Jacob Gordon, Rachel Kornfield, Andrew B L Berry","doi":"10.1145/3687000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>People with multiple chronic conditions (MCC) face challenges planning health care collaboratively with primary care clinicians, particularly when their priorities conflict. These challenges intensify with symptoms of anxiety or depression. Elicitation of patients' values is promoted as a means to aligning patient and clinician priorities in primary care, and as a component of psychotherapy for anxiety and depression. But, these approaches remain siloed. We conducted a qualitative interview study to understand patients' preferences for Technology Enabled Services (TESs) to coordinate values elicitation across primary and mental health care settings. Many participants preferred face-to-face elicitation by a mental health clinician; some preferred elicitation via telehealth and some preferred self-directed elicitation. Participants' preferences were influenced by: 1) how they perceived the rationale and benefits of values elicitation; 2) how they perceived the training and credibility of people facilitating elicitation; and 3) how they perceived their own capacity to engage in values elicitation. Participants also shared numerous concerns about values elicitation that warrant critical examination of TESs to support it.</p>","PeriodicalId":36902,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction","volume":"8 CSCW2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11737607/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving Collaborative Management of Multiple Mental and Physical Health Conditions: A Qualitative Inquiry into Designing Technology-Enabled Services for Eliciting Patients' Values.\",\"authors\":\"William Wibowo Liem, Emily G Lattie, Bayley J Taple, Caitlin A Stamatis, Jacob Gordon, Rachel Kornfield, Andrew B L Berry\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3687000\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>People with multiple chronic conditions (MCC) face challenges planning health care collaboratively with primary care clinicians, particularly when their priorities conflict. These challenges intensify with symptoms of anxiety or depression. Elicitation of patients' values is promoted as a means to aligning patient and clinician priorities in primary care, and as a component of psychotherapy for anxiety and depression. But, these approaches remain siloed. We conducted a qualitative interview study to understand patients' preferences for Technology Enabled Services (TESs) to coordinate values elicitation across primary and mental health care settings. Many participants preferred face-to-face elicitation by a mental health clinician; some preferred elicitation via telehealth and some preferred self-directed elicitation. Participants' preferences were influenced by: 1) how they perceived the rationale and benefits of values elicitation; 2) how they perceived the training and credibility of people facilitating elicitation; and 3) how they perceived their own capacity to engage in values elicitation. Participants also shared numerous concerns about values elicitation that warrant critical examination of TESs to support it.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36902,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction\",\"volume\":\"8 CSCW2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11737607/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3687000\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3687000","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

患有多种慢性疾病(MCC)的人面临着与初级保健临床医生合作规划卫生保健的挑战,特别是当他们的优先事项发生冲突时。这些挑战随着焦虑或抑郁症状的出现而加剧。在初级保健中,对患者价值观的启发是一种调整患者和临床医生优先事项的手段,也是焦虑和抑郁心理治疗的一个组成部分。但是,这些方法仍然是孤立的。我们进行了一项定性访谈研究,以了解患者对技术支持服务(TESs)的偏好,以协调初级卫生保健和精神卫生保健机构之间的价值观启发。许多参与者更喜欢心理健康临床医生面对面的启发;有些人更喜欢远程医疗的启发,有些人更喜欢自我引导的启发。参与者的偏好受到以下因素的影响:1)他们如何看待价值观启发的原理和好处;2)他们如何看待促进启发的人员的培训和可信度;3)他们如何看待自己参与价值观启发的能力。与会者还分享了许多关于价值观启发的担忧,这些担忧需要对TESs进行严格审查以支持它。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improving Collaborative Management of Multiple Mental and Physical Health Conditions: A Qualitative Inquiry into Designing Technology-Enabled Services for Eliciting Patients' Values.

People with multiple chronic conditions (MCC) face challenges planning health care collaboratively with primary care clinicians, particularly when their priorities conflict. These challenges intensify with symptoms of anxiety or depression. Elicitation of patients' values is promoted as a means to aligning patient and clinician priorities in primary care, and as a component of psychotherapy for anxiety and depression. But, these approaches remain siloed. We conducted a qualitative interview study to understand patients' preferences for Technology Enabled Services (TESs) to coordinate values elicitation across primary and mental health care settings. Many participants preferred face-to-face elicitation by a mental health clinician; some preferred elicitation via telehealth and some preferred self-directed elicitation. Participants' preferences were influenced by: 1) how they perceived the rationale and benefits of values elicitation; 2) how they perceived the training and credibility of people facilitating elicitation; and 3) how they perceived their own capacity to engage in values elicitation. Participants also shared numerous concerns about values elicitation that warrant critical examination of TESs to support it.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
257
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信