Alan M Smeltz, Andrew Huffman, Robert S Isaak, Xinming An, Gregory Balfanz
{"title":"与围手术期血液制品制备相关的感知问题。","authors":"Alan M Smeltz, Andrew Huffman, Robert S Isaak, Xinming An, Gregory Balfanz","doi":"10.1177/17504589241311699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Timely blood product preparation is important for patients undergoing surgery with a high risk of blood loss. However, in circumstances where no blood refrigerators exist in the operating room theatre complex, numerous potential problem sources during blood product preparation may lead to delays, and tense interpersonal interactions between anaesthesia and blood bank personnel can ensue. To evaluate this at our institution, an anonymous online survey was sent to anaesthesia providers and blood bank technologists. The primary outcome was to determine what blood preparation time anaesthesia providers believed was reasonable to expect, compared to the institutional standard of 90 min. Of the 75 (36%) anaesthesia providers surveyed, 94.9% considered <90 min was reasonable for blood to be prepared and 79.7% considered <60 min was reasonable. There were 92 (42%) total survey respondents, with 54.8% reporting problems to occur 'frequently' or 'always'. The perceived frequency of 18 different possible problem sources was identified. Overall, the results suggest problems with perioperative blood product preparation occur frequently and the expectations of the anaesthetic team around preparation time and availability of blood products are not met. Many potential problem areas were identified that warrant further investigation into the ongoing efforts to improve workflow and interdisciplinary interactions.</p>","PeriodicalId":35481,"journal":{"name":"Journal of perioperative practice","volume":" ","pages":"17504589241311699"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceived problems associated with perioperative blood product preparation.\",\"authors\":\"Alan M Smeltz, Andrew Huffman, Robert S Isaak, Xinming An, Gregory Balfanz\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17504589241311699\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Timely blood product preparation is important for patients undergoing surgery with a high risk of blood loss. However, in circumstances where no blood refrigerators exist in the operating room theatre complex, numerous potential problem sources during blood product preparation may lead to delays, and tense interpersonal interactions between anaesthesia and blood bank personnel can ensue. To evaluate this at our institution, an anonymous online survey was sent to anaesthesia providers and blood bank technologists. The primary outcome was to determine what blood preparation time anaesthesia providers believed was reasonable to expect, compared to the institutional standard of 90 min. Of the 75 (36%) anaesthesia providers surveyed, 94.9% considered <90 min was reasonable for blood to be prepared and 79.7% considered <60 min was reasonable. There were 92 (42%) total survey respondents, with 54.8% reporting problems to occur 'frequently' or 'always'. The perceived frequency of 18 different possible problem sources was identified. Overall, the results suggest problems with perioperative blood product preparation occur frequently and the expectations of the anaesthetic team around preparation time and availability of blood products are not met. Many potential problem areas were identified that warrant further investigation into the ongoing efforts to improve workflow and interdisciplinary interactions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35481,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of perioperative practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"17504589241311699\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of perioperative practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17504589241311699\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of perioperative practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17504589241311699","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Perceived problems associated with perioperative blood product preparation.
Timely blood product preparation is important for patients undergoing surgery with a high risk of blood loss. However, in circumstances where no blood refrigerators exist in the operating room theatre complex, numerous potential problem sources during blood product preparation may lead to delays, and tense interpersonal interactions between anaesthesia and blood bank personnel can ensue. To evaluate this at our institution, an anonymous online survey was sent to anaesthesia providers and blood bank technologists. The primary outcome was to determine what blood preparation time anaesthesia providers believed was reasonable to expect, compared to the institutional standard of 90 min. Of the 75 (36%) anaesthesia providers surveyed, 94.9% considered <90 min was reasonable for blood to be prepared and 79.7% considered <60 min was reasonable. There were 92 (42%) total survey respondents, with 54.8% reporting problems to occur 'frequently' or 'always'. The perceived frequency of 18 different possible problem sources was identified. Overall, the results suggest problems with perioperative blood product preparation occur frequently and the expectations of the anaesthetic team around preparation time and availability of blood products are not met. Many potential problem areas were identified that warrant further investigation into the ongoing efforts to improve workflow and interdisciplinary interactions.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Perioperative Practice (JPP) is the official journal of the Association for Perioperative Practice (AfPP). It is an international, peer reviewed journal with a multidisciplinary ethos across all aspects of perioperative care. The overall aim of the journal is to improve patient safety through informing and developing practice. It is an informative professional journal which provides current evidence-based practice, clinical, management and educational developments for practitioners working in the perioperative environment. The journal promotes perioperative practice by publishing clinical research-based articles, literature reviews, topical discussions, advice on clinical issues, current news items and product information.