学习型卫生系统的经验教训:利用患者的健康信息和生物标本有效地与患者沟通研究。

IF 2.6 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Kayte Spector-Bagdady, Kerry A. Ryan, Luyun Chen, Camille Giacobone, Reshma Jagsi, Reema Hamasha, Katherine Hendy, J. Denard Thomas, Jessie M. Milne, Alexandra H. Vinson, Jodyn Platt
{"title":"学习型卫生系统的经验教训:利用患者的健康信息和生物标本有效地与患者沟通研究。","authors":"Kayte Spector-Bagdady,&nbsp;Kerry A. Ryan,&nbsp;Luyun Chen,&nbsp;Camille Giacobone,&nbsp;Reshma Jagsi,&nbsp;Reema Hamasha,&nbsp;Katherine Hendy,&nbsp;J. Denard Thomas,&nbsp;Jessie M. Milne,&nbsp;Alexandra H. Vinson,&nbsp;Jodyn Platt","doi":"10.1002/lrh2.10450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Sharing patient health information and biospecimens can improve health outcomes and accelerate breakthroughs in medical research. But patients generally lack understanding of how their clinical data and biospecimens are used or commercialized for research. In this mixed methods project, we assessed the impact of communication materials on patient understanding, attitudes, and perceptions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Michigan Medicine patients were recruited for a survey (<i>n</i> = 480) or focus group (<i>n</i> = 33) via a web-based research study portal. The survey assessed the impact of mode of communication about health data and biospecimen sharing (via an informational poster vs. a news article) on patient perceptions of privacy, transparency, comfort, respect, and trust. Focus groups provided in-depth qualitative feedback on three communication materials, including a poster, FAQ webpage, and a consent form excerpt.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Among survey respondents, the type of intervention (poster vs. news) made no statistically significant difference in its influence on any characteristic. However, 95% preferred that Michigan Medicine tell them about patient data and biospecimen research sharing versus hearing it from the news. Focus group participants provided additional insights, discussing values and perceptions of altruism and reciprocity, concerns about commercialization, privacy, and security; and the desire for consent, control, and transparency.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Developing our understanding of patient data-sharing practices and integrating patient preferences into health system policy, through this work and continued exploration, contributes to building infrastructure that can be used to support the development of a learning health system across hospital systems nationally.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":43916,"journal":{"name":"Learning Health Systems","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11733471/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lessons for a learning health system: Effectively communicating to patients about research with their health information and biospecimens\",\"authors\":\"Kayte Spector-Bagdady,&nbsp;Kerry A. Ryan,&nbsp;Luyun Chen,&nbsp;Camille Giacobone,&nbsp;Reshma Jagsi,&nbsp;Reema Hamasha,&nbsp;Katherine Hendy,&nbsp;J. Denard Thomas,&nbsp;Jessie M. Milne,&nbsp;Alexandra H. Vinson,&nbsp;Jodyn Platt\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/lrh2.10450\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Sharing patient health information and biospecimens can improve health outcomes and accelerate breakthroughs in medical research. But patients generally lack understanding of how their clinical data and biospecimens are used or commercialized for research. In this mixed methods project, we assessed the impact of communication materials on patient understanding, attitudes, and perceptions.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Michigan Medicine patients were recruited for a survey (<i>n</i> = 480) or focus group (<i>n</i> = 33) via a web-based research study portal. The survey assessed the impact of mode of communication about health data and biospecimen sharing (via an informational poster vs. a news article) on patient perceptions of privacy, transparency, comfort, respect, and trust. Focus groups provided in-depth qualitative feedback on three communication materials, including a poster, FAQ webpage, and a consent form excerpt.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Among survey respondents, the type of intervention (poster vs. news) made no statistically significant difference in its influence on any characteristic. However, 95% preferred that Michigan Medicine tell them about patient data and biospecimen research sharing versus hearing it from the news. Focus group participants provided additional insights, discussing values and perceptions of altruism and reciprocity, concerns about commercialization, privacy, and security; and the desire for consent, control, and transparency.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Developing our understanding of patient data-sharing practices and integrating patient preferences into health system policy, through this work and continued exploration, contributes to building infrastructure that can be used to support the development of a learning health system across hospital systems nationally.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43916,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning Health Systems\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11733471/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning Health Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lrh2.10450\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning Health Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lrh2.10450","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:共享患者健康信息和生物标本可以改善健康结果,加速医学研究的突破。但患者通常不了解他们的临床数据和生物标本是如何被用于研究或商业化的。在这个混合方法项目中,我们评估了沟通材料对患者理解、态度和看法的影响。方法:通过基于网络的研究门户网站,招募密歇根医学院的患者进行调查(n = 480)或焦点小组(n = 33)。该调查评估了关于健康数据和生物标本共享的沟通模式(通过信息海报与新闻文章)对患者对隐私、透明度、舒适度、尊重和信任的看法的影响。焦点小组对三种交流材料提供了深入的定性反馈,包括海报、常见问题解答网页和同意书摘录。结果:在被调查者中,干预类型(海报与新闻)对任何特征的影响没有统计学上的显著差异。然而,95%的人更喜欢密歇根医学院告诉他们患者数据和生物标本研究共享,而不是从新闻中听到。焦点小组参与者提供了额外的见解,讨论了利他主义和互惠主义的价值观和观念,对商业化、隐私和安全的担忧;以及对同意、控制和透明的渴望。结论:通过这项工作和持续的探索,加深我们对患者数据共享实践的理解,并将患者偏好纳入卫生系统政策,有助于建立可用于支持全国医院系统中学习型卫生系统发展的基础设施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Lessons for a learning health system: Effectively communicating to patients about research with their health information and biospecimens

Lessons for a learning health system: Effectively communicating to patients about research with their health information and biospecimens

Introduction

Sharing patient health information and biospecimens can improve health outcomes and accelerate breakthroughs in medical research. But patients generally lack understanding of how their clinical data and biospecimens are used or commercialized for research. In this mixed methods project, we assessed the impact of communication materials on patient understanding, attitudes, and perceptions.

Methods

Michigan Medicine patients were recruited for a survey (n = 480) or focus group (n = 33) via a web-based research study portal. The survey assessed the impact of mode of communication about health data and biospecimen sharing (via an informational poster vs. a news article) on patient perceptions of privacy, transparency, comfort, respect, and trust. Focus groups provided in-depth qualitative feedback on three communication materials, including a poster, FAQ webpage, and a consent form excerpt.

Results

Among survey respondents, the type of intervention (poster vs. news) made no statistically significant difference in its influence on any characteristic. However, 95% preferred that Michigan Medicine tell them about patient data and biospecimen research sharing versus hearing it from the news. Focus group participants provided additional insights, discussing values and perceptions of altruism and reciprocity, concerns about commercialization, privacy, and security; and the desire for consent, control, and transparency.

Conclusion

Developing our understanding of patient data-sharing practices and integrating patient preferences into health system policy, through this work and continued exploration, contributes to building infrastructure that can be used to support the development of a learning health system across hospital systems nationally.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Learning Health Systems
Learning Health Systems HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
22.60%
发文量
55
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信