液体活检在临床实践中的潜力和关键问题:综述。

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Translational Oncology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-15 DOI:10.1016/j.tranon.2024.102172
Nicola Veronese, Claudio Luchini, Stefano Ciriminna, Katia Spinelli, Santo Fruscione, Paola Mattiolo, Miriam Belluzzo, Veronica Messina, Lee Smith, Mario Barbagallo, Walter Mazzucco
{"title":"液体活检在临床实践中的潜力和关键问题:综述。","authors":"Nicola Veronese, Claudio Luchini, Stefano Ciriminna, Katia Spinelli, Santo Fruscione, Paola Mattiolo, Miriam Belluzzo, Veronica Messina, Lee Smith, Mario Barbagallo, Walter Mazzucco","doi":"10.1016/j.tranon.2024.102172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Liquid biopsy (LB) is a laboratory test performed on a fluid sample aiming at analyzing molecular data derived from circulating cells and related entities, or from nucleic acids. This umbrella review aims to map and evaluate the evidence supporting the use of LB in medicine across different medical specialities and conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched three repositories from database inception up to October 1, 2023 and we included meta-analyses of observational studies reporting data on the use of LB, compared to gold standard, and its accuracy (area under the curve, AUC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 726 articles initially screened, 42 systematic reviews were included. Most of the outcomes explored (202/211) were related to cancer. We found that 75/211 had an excellent accuracy (AUC >0.90), with one comparison with an AUC equal to 1, i.e., Cell-Free Human Papillomavirus DNA (cfHPV-DNA) for HPV-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. However, considering published meta-analyses, all the outcomes were graded as very low on the GRADE criteria, and the heterogeneity was never reported.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The literature about LB is rapidly increasing and some promising data about precision oncology are now available. However, this umbrella review on existing meta-analyses highlighted some critical issues for providing quantitative estimations on the different roles of LB.</p>","PeriodicalId":23244,"journal":{"name":"Translational Oncology","volume":"52 ","pages":"102172"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11786759/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Potentialities and critical issues of liquid biopsy in clinical practice: An umbrella review.\",\"authors\":\"Nicola Veronese, Claudio Luchini, Stefano Ciriminna, Katia Spinelli, Santo Fruscione, Paola Mattiolo, Miriam Belluzzo, Veronica Messina, Lee Smith, Mario Barbagallo, Walter Mazzucco\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tranon.2024.102172\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Liquid biopsy (LB) is a laboratory test performed on a fluid sample aiming at analyzing molecular data derived from circulating cells and related entities, or from nucleic acids. This umbrella review aims to map and evaluate the evidence supporting the use of LB in medicine across different medical specialities and conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched three repositories from database inception up to October 1, 2023 and we included meta-analyses of observational studies reporting data on the use of LB, compared to gold standard, and its accuracy (area under the curve, AUC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 726 articles initially screened, 42 systematic reviews were included. Most of the outcomes explored (202/211) were related to cancer. We found that 75/211 had an excellent accuracy (AUC >0.90), with one comparison with an AUC equal to 1, i.e., Cell-Free Human Papillomavirus DNA (cfHPV-DNA) for HPV-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. However, considering published meta-analyses, all the outcomes were graded as very low on the GRADE criteria, and the heterogeneity was never reported.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The literature about LB is rapidly increasing and some promising data about precision oncology are now available. However, this umbrella review on existing meta-analyses highlighted some critical issues for providing quantitative estimations on the different roles of LB.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23244,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational Oncology\",\"volume\":\"52 \",\"pages\":\"102172\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11786759/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2024.102172\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2024.102172","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:液体活检(LB)是一种对液体样本进行的实验室检测,旨在分析来自循环细胞和相关实体或核酸的分子数据。本综述旨在绘制和评估支持在不同医学专业和条件下使用LB的证据。方法:我们检索了三个数据库,从数据库建立到2023年10月1日,我们纳入了观察性研究的荟萃分析,报告了与金标准相比使用LB的数据,及其准确性(曲线下面积,AUC)。结果:在最初筛选的726篇文章中,纳入了42篇系统评价。大多数研究结果(202/211)与癌症有关。我们发现75/211具有极好的准确性(AUC为0.90),其中一个与AUC等于1的比较,即hpv阳性口咽鳞状细胞癌的无细胞人乳头瘤病毒DNA (cfHPV-DNA)。然而,考虑到已发表的荟萃分析,所有结果在GRADE标准上的评分都很低,并且从未报道过异质性。讨论:关于LB的文献正在迅速增加,现在有一些关于精确肿瘤学的有希望的数据。然而,这篇对现有荟萃分析的综述强调了一些关键问题,以提供对LB不同作用的定量估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Potentialities and critical issues of liquid biopsy in clinical practice: An umbrella review.

Background: Liquid biopsy (LB) is a laboratory test performed on a fluid sample aiming at analyzing molecular data derived from circulating cells and related entities, or from nucleic acids. This umbrella review aims to map and evaluate the evidence supporting the use of LB in medicine across different medical specialities and conditions.

Methods: We searched three repositories from database inception up to October 1, 2023 and we included meta-analyses of observational studies reporting data on the use of LB, compared to gold standard, and its accuracy (area under the curve, AUC).

Results: Among 726 articles initially screened, 42 systematic reviews were included. Most of the outcomes explored (202/211) were related to cancer. We found that 75/211 had an excellent accuracy (AUC >0.90), with one comparison with an AUC equal to 1, i.e., Cell-Free Human Papillomavirus DNA (cfHPV-DNA) for HPV-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. However, considering published meta-analyses, all the outcomes were graded as very low on the GRADE criteria, and the heterogeneity was never reported.

Discussion: The literature about LB is rapidly increasing and some promising data about precision oncology are now available. However, this umbrella review on existing meta-analyses highlighted some critical issues for providing quantitative estimations on the different roles of LB.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Translational Oncology
Translational Oncology Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Cancer Research
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
2.00%
发文量
314
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Translational Oncology publishes the results of novel research investigations which bridge the laboratory and clinical settings including risk assessment, cellular and molecular characterization, prevention, detection, diagnosis and treatment of human cancers with the overall goal of improving the clinical care of oncology patients. Translational Oncology will publish laboratory studies of novel therapeutic interventions as well as clinical trials which evaluate new treatment paradigms for cancer. Peer reviewed manuscript types include Original Reports, Reviews and Editorials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信