Yan Wang, Fangyu Li, Qi Qin, Tingting Li, Qi Wang, Yan Li, Ying Li, Jianping Jia
{"title":"APOE ε4对脑脊液生物标志物与临床阿尔茨海默病鉴别的影响","authors":"Yan Wang, Fangyu Li, Qi Qin, Tingting Li, Qi Wang, Yan Li, Ying Li, Jianping Jia","doi":"10.1016/j.tjpad.2025.100065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Apolipoprotein E ε4 (APOE ε4) bring the higher risk of Alzheimer' Disease (AD). It is essential to evaluate whether the diagnostic performances and critical values of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers are influenced by APOE ε4, which has guiding significance for the clinical practical application.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The differences in CSF biomarkers and their performances between APOE ε4 carriers and non-carriers in distinguishing AD, mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and preclinical AD from normal controls (NCs) were analyzed. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to compare the area under the curve (AUC) between APOE ε4 carriers and non-carriers, as well as the critical values corresponding Youden Index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In a cross sectional convenience sample of 1610 participants, lower Aβ42 and Aβ42/Aβ40 and higher p-Tau 181/Aβ42 in CSF were observed among APOE ε4 carriers than non-carriers in NC, MCI, and AD groups (P< 0.05). The performance of CSF p-tau/Aβ42 in distinguishing MCI from NC among APOE ε4 carriers was superior to non-carriers [AUC: 0.714 (95%CI: 0.673- 0.752) vs 0.600 (95%CI: 0.564- 0.634), P< 0.001], although it was similar in distinguishing AD from NC between APOE ε4 carriers and non-carriers [AUC: 0.874 (95%CI: 0.835-0.906) vs 0.876 (95%CI: 0.843- 0.904)]. In the longitudinal cohort of 254 participants, the association of CSF Aβ42, Aβ42/Aβ40 and p-Tau181/Aβ42 with cognitive decline were stronger in APOE ε4 carriers compared to non-carriers (P< 0.05). Meanwhile, the critical values were different depending on APOE genotype.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The CSF level of p-Tau181/Aβ42 was significantly different between APOE ε4 carriers and non-carriers at different stages of AD. The results indicate that the performances of CSF biomarkers are influenced by APOE ε4, which should be considered in the practical application.</p>","PeriodicalId":22711,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":" ","pages":"100065"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of APOE ε4 on performance of CSF biomarkers in differentiating clinical Alzheimer's disease.\",\"authors\":\"Yan Wang, Fangyu Li, Qi Qin, Tingting Li, Qi Wang, Yan Li, Ying Li, Jianping Jia\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tjpad.2025.100065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Apolipoprotein E ε4 (APOE ε4) bring the higher risk of Alzheimer' Disease (AD). It is essential to evaluate whether the diagnostic performances and critical values of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers are influenced by APOE ε4, which has guiding significance for the clinical practical application.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The differences in CSF biomarkers and their performances between APOE ε4 carriers and non-carriers in distinguishing AD, mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and preclinical AD from normal controls (NCs) were analyzed. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to compare the area under the curve (AUC) between APOE ε4 carriers and non-carriers, as well as the critical values corresponding Youden Index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In a cross sectional convenience sample of 1610 participants, lower Aβ42 and Aβ42/Aβ40 and higher p-Tau 181/Aβ42 in CSF were observed among APOE ε4 carriers than non-carriers in NC, MCI, and AD groups (P< 0.05). The performance of CSF p-tau/Aβ42 in distinguishing MCI from NC among APOE ε4 carriers was superior to non-carriers [AUC: 0.714 (95%CI: 0.673- 0.752) vs 0.600 (95%CI: 0.564- 0.634), P< 0.001], although it was similar in distinguishing AD from NC between APOE ε4 carriers and non-carriers [AUC: 0.874 (95%CI: 0.835-0.906) vs 0.876 (95%CI: 0.843- 0.904)]. In the longitudinal cohort of 254 participants, the association of CSF Aβ42, Aβ42/Aβ40 and p-Tau181/Aβ42 with cognitive decline were stronger in APOE ε4 carriers compared to non-carriers (P< 0.05). Meanwhile, the critical values were different depending on APOE genotype.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The CSF level of p-Tau181/Aβ42 was significantly different between APOE ε4 carriers and non-carriers at different stages of AD. The results indicate that the performances of CSF biomarkers are influenced by APOE ε4, which should be considered in the practical application.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22711,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"100065\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjpad.2025.100065\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjpad.2025.100065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
载脂蛋白E ε4 (APOE ε4)增加了阿尔茨海默病(AD)的发病风险。评价APOE ε4是否影响脑脊液(CSF)生物标志物的诊断性能和临界值,对临床实际应用具有指导意义。方法:分析APOE ε4携带者与非携带者在区分AD、轻度认知障碍(MCI)和临床前AD与正常对照(nc)方面脑脊液生物标志物及其表现的差异。生成受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,比较APOE ε4携带者与非携带者的曲线下面积(AUC)以及对应的约登指数临界值。结果:在1610名参与者的横断面方便样本中,APOE ε4携带者的脑脊液a β42和a β42/ a β40低于非携带者,P - tau 181/ a β42高于非携带者(P< 0.05)。CSF P -tau/ a - β42在APOE ε4携带者中区分MCI和NC的表现优于非携带者[AUC: 0.714 (95%CI: 0.673- 0.752) vs 0.600 (95%CI: 0.564- 0.634), P< 0.001],尽管APOE ε4携带者和非携带者在区分AD和NC方面相似[AUC: 0.874 (95%CI: 0.835-0.906) vs 0.876 (95%CI: 0.843- 0.904)]。在254名受试者的纵向队列中,APOE ε4携带者与非携带者相比,CSF a - β42、a - β42/ a - β40和P - tau181 / a - β42与认知能力下降的相关性更强(P< 0.05)。同时,APOE基因型不同,临界值也不同。讨论:APOE ε4携带者与非携带者在AD不同阶段脑脊液中p-Tau181/ a - β42水平有显著差异。结果表明,APOE ε4对脑脊液生物标志物的性能有影响,在实际应用中应予以考虑。
Influence of APOE ε4 on performance of CSF biomarkers in differentiating clinical Alzheimer's disease.
Introduction: Apolipoprotein E ε4 (APOE ε4) bring the higher risk of Alzheimer' Disease (AD). It is essential to evaluate whether the diagnostic performances and critical values of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers are influenced by APOE ε4, which has guiding significance for the clinical practical application.
Methods: The differences in CSF biomarkers and their performances between APOE ε4 carriers and non-carriers in distinguishing AD, mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and preclinical AD from normal controls (NCs) were analyzed. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to compare the area under the curve (AUC) between APOE ε4 carriers and non-carriers, as well as the critical values corresponding Youden Index.
Results: In a cross sectional convenience sample of 1610 participants, lower Aβ42 and Aβ42/Aβ40 and higher p-Tau 181/Aβ42 in CSF were observed among APOE ε4 carriers than non-carriers in NC, MCI, and AD groups (P< 0.05). The performance of CSF p-tau/Aβ42 in distinguishing MCI from NC among APOE ε4 carriers was superior to non-carriers [AUC: 0.714 (95%CI: 0.673- 0.752) vs 0.600 (95%CI: 0.564- 0.634), P< 0.001], although it was similar in distinguishing AD from NC between APOE ε4 carriers and non-carriers [AUC: 0.874 (95%CI: 0.835-0.906) vs 0.876 (95%CI: 0.843- 0.904)]. In the longitudinal cohort of 254 participants, the association of CSF Aβ42, Aβ42/Aβ40 and p-Tau181/Aβ42 with cognitive decline were stronger in APOE ε4 carriers compared to non-carriers (P< 0.05). Meanwhile, the critical values were different depending on APOE genotype.
Discussion: The CSF level of p-Tau181/Aβ42 was significantly different between APOE ε4 carriers and non-carriers at different stages of AD. The results indicate that the performances of CSF biomarkers are influenced by APOE ε4, which should be considered in the practical application.
期刊介绍:
The JPAD Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer’Disease will publish reviews, original research articles and short reports to improve our knowledge in the field of Alzheimer prevention including: neurosciences, biomarkers, imaging, epidemiology, public health, physical cognitive exercise, nutrition, risk and protective factors, drug development, trials design, and heath economic outcomes.JPAD will publish also the meeting abstracts from Clinical Trial on Alzheimer Disease (CTAD) and will be distributed both in paper and online version worldwide.We hope that JPAD with your contribution will play a role in the development of Alzheimer prevention.