有效药物成分的PBT/PMT评价。

IF 3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, LEGAL
Gemma Janer, Joanne Elmoznino, Andreas Häner, Irene Bramke
{"title":"有效药物成分的PBT/PMT评价。","authors":"Gemma Janer, Joanne Elmoznino, Andreas Häner, Irene Bramke","doi":"10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105772","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The EU Commission proposal for a new EU pharmaceutical legislation considers PBT (persistence-bioaccumulation-toxicity) and PMT (persistence-mobility-toxicity) criteria for pharmaceuticals. Under current environmental risk assessment guidance, a PBT assessment is required regardless of the predicted environmental concentrations. However, consumption volumes of pharmaceuticals are contingent on marketing approval by EMA and are therefore predictable and their toxicological potency is established prior to any regulatory approval. Consumption volume and toxicological potency of pharmaceuticals span many orders of magnitude and are strong risk determinants. Routine data generation to evaluate persistence, mobility and bioaccumulation hazards as a means of pinpointing pharmaceuticals of increased environmental concern is therefore of questionable added value. We present options to derive action triggers for PBT and/or PMT screening using exposure predictions and toxicological potency data. Our simulations demonstrate that an exposure-based action limit can be established as a trigger for PMT assessment, while a combined trigger based on exposure levels and mammalian toxicity is proposed for PBT assessment. The proposed approach is conservatively designed to ensure that compounds with any potential risks a) of secondary poisoning (main concern for PBT substances) and b) to groundwater/drinking water (main concern for PMT substances) are targeted for full evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":20852,"journal":{"name":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"105772"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PBT/PMT assessment of active pharmaceutical ingredients.\",\"authors\":\"Gemma Janer, Joanne Elmoznino, Andreas Häner, Irene Bramke\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105772\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The EU Commission proposal for a new EU pharmaceutical legislation considers PBT (persistence-bioaccumulation-toxicity) and PMT (persistence-mobility-toxicity) criteria for pharmaceuticals. Under current environmental risk assessment guidance, a PBT assessment is required regardless of the predicted environmental concentrations. However, consumption volumes of pharmaceuticals are contingent on marketing approval by EMA and are therefore predictable and their toxicological potency is established prior to any regulatory approval. Consumption volume and toxicological potency of pharmaceuticals span many orders of magnitude and are strong risk determinants. Routine data generation to evaluate persistence, mobility and bioaccumulation hazards as a means of pinpointing pharmaceuticals of increased environmental concern is therefore of questionable added value. We present options to derive action triggers for PBT and/or PMT screening using exposure predictions and toxicological potency data. Our simulations demonstrate that an exposure-based action limit can be established as a trigger for PMT assessment, while a combined trigger based on exposure levels and mammalian toxicity is proposed for PBT assessment. The proposed approach is conservatively designed to ensure that compounds with any potential risks a) of secondary poisoning (main concern for PBT substances) and b) to groundwater/drinking water (main concern for PMT substances) are targeted for full evaluation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20852,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"105772\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105772\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, LEGAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105772","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

欧盟委员会提出了一项新的欧盟制药立法,考虑了药品的PBT(持久性-生物积累-毒性)和PMT(持久性-流动性-毒性)标准。根据目前的环境风险评估指导,无论预测的环境浓度如何,都需要进行PBT评估。然而,药品的消费量取决于EMA的上市批准,因此是可预测的,其毒理学效力在任何监管批准之前就已确定。药品的消费量和毒理学效力跨越许多数量级,是强有力的风险决定因素。因此,为评价持久性、移动性和生物蓄积性危害而产生的常规数据,作为确定日益引起环境关注的药物的手段,其附加价值值得怀疑。我们提出了使用暴露预测和毒理学效力数据来获得PBT和/或PMT筛查的行动触发因素的选择。我们的模拟表明,基于暴露的作用限值可以作为PMT评估的触发因素,而基于暴露水平和哺乳动物毒性的组合触发因素可以用于PBT评估。拟议的方法设计保守,以确保具有任何潜在风险的化合物a)二次中毒(主要关注PBT物质)和b)地下水/饮用水(主要关注PMT物质)是全面评估的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PBT/PMT assessment of active pharmaceutical ingredients.

The EU Commission proposal for a new EU pharmaceutical legislation considers PBT (persistence-bioaccumulation-toxicity) and PMT (persistence-mobility-toxicity) criteria for pharmaceuticals. Under current environmental risk assessment guidance, a PBT assessment is required regardless of the predicted environmental concentrations. However, consumption volumes of pharmaceuticals are contingent on marketing approval by EMA and are therefore predictable and their toxicological potency is established prior to any regulatory approval. Consumption volume and toxicological potency of pharmaceuticals span many orders of magnitude and are strong risk determinants. Routine data generation to evaluate persistence, mobility and bioaccumulation hazards as a means of pinpointing pharmaceuticals of increased environmental concern is therefore of questionable added value. We present options to derive action triggers for PBT and/or PMT screening using exposure predictions and toxicological potency data. Our simulations demonstrate that an exposure-based action limit can be established as a trigger for PMT assessment, while a combined trigger based on exposure levels and mammalian toxicity is proposed for PBT assessment. The proposed approach is conservatively designed to ensure that compounds with any potential risks a) of secondary poisoning (main concern for PBT substances) and b) to groundwater/drinking water (main concern for PMT substances) are targeted for full evaluation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
8.80%
发文量
147
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology publishes peer reviewed articles that involve the generation, evaluation, and interpretation of experimental animal and human data that are of direct importance and relevance for regulatory authorities with respect to toxicological and pharmacological regulations in society. All peer-reviewed articles that are published should be devoted to improve the protection of human health and environment. Reviews and discussions are welcomed that address legal and/or regulatory decisions with respect to risk assessment and management of toxicological and pharmacological compounds on a scientific basis. It addresses an international readership of scientists, risk assessors and managers, and other professionals active in the field of human and environmental health. Types of peer-reviewed articles published: -Original research articles of relevance for regulatory aspects covering aspects including, but not limited to: 1.Factors influencing human sensitivity 2.Exposure science related to risk assessment 3.Alternative toxicological test methods 4.Frameworks for evaluation and integration of data in regulatory evaluations 5.Harmonization across regulatory agencies 6.Read-across methods and evaluations -Contemporary Reviews on policy related Research issues -Letters to the Editor -Guest Editorials (by Invitation)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信