人工智能辅助器官移植风险预测:英国活体肾移植结果预测工具。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Renal Failure Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-21 DOI:10.1080/0886022X.2024.2431147
Hatem Ali, Arun Shroff, Tibor Fülöp, Miklos Z Molnar, Adnan Sharif, Bernard Burke, Sunil Shroff, David Briggs, Nithya Krishnan
{"title":"人工智能辅助器官移植风险预测:英国活体肾移植结果预测工具。","authors":"Hatem Ali, Arun Shroff, Tibor Fülöp, Miklos Z Molnar, Adnan Sharif, Bernard Burke, Sunil Shroff, David Briggs, Nithya Krishnan","doi":"10.1080/0886022X.2024.2431147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Predicting the outcome of a kidney transplant involving a living donor advances donor decision-making donors for clinicians and patients. However, the discriminative or calibration capacity of the currently employed models are limited. We set out to apply artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms to create a highly predictive risk stratification indicator, applicable to the UK's transplant selection process.</p><p><p><b>Methodology:</b> Pre-transplant characteristics from 12,661 live-donor kidney transplants (performed between 2007 and 2022) from the United Kingdom Transplant Registry database were analyzed. The transplants were randomly divided into training (70%) and validation (30%) sets. Death-censored graft survival was the primary performance indicator. We experimented with four machine learning (ML) models assessed for calibration and discrimination [integrated Brier score (IBS) and Harrell's concordance index]. We assessed the potential clinical utility using decision curve analysis.</p><p><p><b>Results:</b> XGBoost demonstrated the best discriminative performance for survival (area under the curve = 0.73, 0.74, and 0.75 at 3, 7, and 10 years post-transplant, respectively). The concordance index was 0.72. The calibration process was adequate, as evidenced by the IBS score of 0.09.</p><p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> By evaluating possible donor-recipient pairs based on graft survival, the AI-based UK Live-Donor Kidney Transplant Outcome Prediction has the potential to enhance choices for the best live-donor selection. This methodology may improve the outcomes of kidney paired exchange schemes. In general terms we show how the new AI and ML tools can have a role in developing effective and equitable healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":20839,"journal":{"name":"Renal Failure","volume":"47 1","pages":"2431147"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11755740/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial intelligence assisted risk prediction in organ transplantation: a UK Live-Donor Kidney Transplant Outcome Prediction tool.\",\"authors\":\"Hatem Ali, Arun Shroff, Tibor Fülöp, Miklos Z Molnar, Adnan Sharif, Bernard Burke, Sunil Shroff, David Briggs, Nithya Krishnan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0886022X.2024.2431147\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Predicting the outcome of a kidney transplant involving a living donor advances donor decision-making donors for clinicians and patients. However, the discriminative or calibration capacity of the currently employed models are limited. We set out to apply artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms to create a highly predictive risk stratification indicator, applicable to the UK's transplant selection process.</p><p><p><b>Methodology:</b> Pre-transplant characteristics from 12,661 live-donor kidney transplants (performed between 2007 and 2022) from the United Kingdom Transplant Registry database were analyzed. The transplants were randomly divided into training (70%) and validation (30%) sets. Death-censored graft survival was the primary performance indicator. We experimented with four machine learning (ML) models assessed for calibration and discrimination [integrated Brier score (IBS) and Harrell's concordance index]. We assessed the potential clinical utility using decision curve analysis.</p><p><p><b>Results:</b> XGBoost demonstrated the best discriminative performance for survival (area under the curve = 0.73, 0.74, and 0.75 at 3, 7, and 10 years post-transplant, respectively). The concordance index was 0.72. The calibration process was adequate, as evidenced by the IBS score of 0.09.</p><p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> By evaluating possible donor-recipient pairs based on graft survival, the AI-based UK Live-Donor Kidney Transplant Outcome Prediction has the potential to enhance choices for the best live-donor selection. This methodology may improve the outcomes of kidney paired exchange schemes. In general terms we show how the new AI and ML tools can have a role in developing effective and equitable healthcare.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20839,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Renal Failure\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"2431147\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11755740/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Renal Failure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0886022X.2024.2431147\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renal Failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0886022X.2024.2431147","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:预测涉及活体供体的肾移植的结果可以促进临床医生和患者对供体的决策。然而,目前使用的模型的判别或校准能力是有限的。我们开始应用人工智能(AI)算法来创建一个高度预测的风险分层指标,适用于英国的移植选择过程。方法:分析来自英国移植登记数据库的12,661例活体肾脏移植(2007年至2022年进行)的移植前特征。移植随机分为训练组(70%)和验证组(30%)。死亡审查移植存活是主要的性能指标。我们对四种机器学习(ML)模型进行了实验,评估其校准和区分[综合Brier评分(IBS)和Harrell's一致性指数]。我们使用决策曲线分析评估了潜在的临床应用。结果:XGBoost表现出最佳的生存判别性能(在移植后3年、7年和10年的曲线下面积分别为0.73、0.74和0.75)。一致性指数为0.72。校准过程是充分的,IBS评分为0.09。结论:基于人工智能的英国活体肾移植预后预测,通过评估基于移植物存活的可能供体-受体配对,有可能增加最佳活体供体选择的选择。这种方法可以改善肾脏配对交换方案的结果。总的来说,我们展示了新的人工智能和机器学习工具如何在开发有效和公平的医疗保健方面发挥作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Artificial intelligence assisted risk prediction in organ transplantation: a UK Live-Donor Kidney Transplant Outcome Prediction tool.

Introduction: Predicting the outcome of a kidney transplant involving a living donor advances donor decision-making donors for clinicians and patients. However, the discriminative or calibration capacity of the currently employed models are limited. We set out to apply artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms to create a highly predictive risk stratification indicator, applicable to the UK's transplant selection process.

Methodology: Pre-transplant characteristics from 12,661 live-donor kidney transplants (performed between 2007 and 2022) from the United Kingdom Transplant Registry database were analyzed. The transplants were randomly divided into training (70%) and validation (30%) sets. Death-censored graft survival was the primary performance indicator. We experimented with four machine learning (ML) models assessed for calibration and discrimination [integrated Brier score (IBS) and Harrell's concordance index]. We assessed the potential clinical utility using decision curve analysis.

Results: XGBoost demonstrated the best discriminative performance for survival (area under the curve = 0.73, 0.74, and 0.75 at 3, 7, and 10 years post-transplant, respectively). The concordance index was 0.72. The calibration process was adequate, as evidenced by the IBS score of 0.09.

Conclusion: By evaluating possible donor-recipient pairs based on graft survival, the AI-based UK Live-Donor Kidney Transplant Outcome Prediction has the potential to enhance choices for the best live-donor selection. This methodology may improve the outcomes of kidney paired exchange schemes. In general terms we show how the new AI and ML tools can have a role in developing effective and equitable healthcare.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Renal Failure
Renal Failure 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
13.30%
发文量
374
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Renal Failure primarily concentrates on acute renal injury and its consequence, but also addresses advances in the fields of chronic renal failure, hypertension, and renal transplantation. Bringing together both clinical and experimental aspects of renal failure, this publication presents timely, practical information on pathology and pathophysiology of acute renal failure; nephrotoxicity of drugs and other substances; prevention, treatment, and therapy of renal failure; renal failure in association with transplantation, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信