快速适应预防药物使用(RAPD):一项旨在增强循证干预对青少年影响的试点随机试验方案。

IF 1.6 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Andria B Eisman, Christine Koffkey, Robert T Partridge, Suzanne Brown, Bo Kim
{"title":"快速适应预防药物使用(RAPD):一项旨在增强循证干预对青少年影响的试点随机试验方案。","authors":"Andria B Eisman, Christine Koffkey, Robert T Partridge, Suzanne Brown, Bo Kim","doi":"10.1186/s40814-024-01581-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Drug use trends change rapidly among youth, leaving intervention experts struggling to respond promptly. Delays in responses can lead to preventable morbidity and mortality. The COVID-19 pandemic underscored the need for implementation science to facilitate rapid, equitable responses using existing treatment and prevention efforts. Existing, widely adopted evidence-based interventions (EBIs; e.g., the Michigan Model for Health™: MMH) are well suited to address emerging drug trends. We have a critical need to advance implementation strategies to optimize system responsiveness to these emerging drug issues. This research aims to design and test implementation strategies to (1) improve the responsiveness of school-based EBIs in addressing urgent issues and (2) find ways to support teachers in implementing updated EBIs, attending to unique considerations of schools serving economically disadvantaged students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The research aims are as follows: aim 1: identify implementation gaps and best practices using After Action Review (a reflective process used by health organizations in responding to emergent public health events) using qualitative methods. Aim 2: design and pilot test RAPD (Rapid Adaptation to Prevent Drug use) based on aim 1 findings. RAPD refers to a novel set of implementation strategies designed to enhance the capacity of an existing, widely adopted evidence-based universal prevention curriculum (MMH) to respond to emerging drug issues among youth. We will pilot test RAPD in ten middle schools serving diverse student populations using a two-group, mixed method, cluster randomized controlled trial design. Aim 3: assess the costs and benefits of RAPD from multiple partner perspectives using a mixed methods approach.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study focuses on designing and deploying implementation strategies to reduce the detrimental impact of emerging drugs and provide an infrastructure to make future adaptations that can be applied in other contexts. After Action Review (AAR) provides a valuable opportunity to review the statewide response to past drug use events, specifically the vaping crisis, using the MMH curriculum, which can systematically guide implementation strategy selection and deployment to meet identified gaps. The rationale for the proposed research is that designing and testing RAPD will advance implementation science in responding to urgent public health events and ensure equitable responses across youth populations.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05806840 .</p>","PeriodicalId":20176,"journal":{"name":"Pilot and Feasibility Studies","volume":"11 1","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11748840/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rapid Adaptation to Prevent Drug Use (RAPD): protocol of a pilot randomized trial to enhance the impact of an evidence-based intervention for youth.\",\"authors\":\"Andria B Eisman, Christine Koffkey, Robert T Partridge, Suzanne Brown, Bo Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40814-024-01581-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Drug use trends change rapidly among youth, leaving intervention experts struggling to respond promptly. Delays in responses can lead to preventable morbidity and mortality. The COVID-19 pandemic underscored the need for implementation science to facilitate rapid, equitable responses using existing treatment and prevention efforts. Existing, widely adopted evidence-based interventions (EBIs; e.g., the Michigan Model for Health™: MMH) are well suited to address emerging drug trends. We have a critical need to advance implementation strategies to optimize system responsiveness to these emerging drug issues. This research aims to design and test implementation strategies to (1) improve the responsiveness of school-based EBIs in addressing urgent issues and (2) find ways to support teachers in implementing updated EBIs, attending to unique considerations of schools serving economically disadvantaged students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The research aims are as follows: aim 1: identify implementation gaps and best practices using After Action Review (a reflective process used by health organizations in responding to emergent public health events) using qualitative methods. Aim 2: design and pilot test RAPD (Rapid Adaptation to Prevent Drug use) based on aim 1 findings. RAPD refers to a novel set of implementation strategies designed to enhance the capacity of an existing, widely adopted evidence-based universal prevention curriculum (MMH) to respond to emerging drug issues among youth. We will pilot test RAPD in ten middle schools serving diverse student populations using a two-group, mixed method, cluster randomized controlled trial design. Aim 3: assess the costs and benefits of RAPD from multiple partner perspectives using a mixed methods approach.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study focuses on designing and deploying implementation strategies to reduce the detrimental impact of emerging drugs and provide an infrastructure to make future adaptations that can be applied in other contexts. After Action Review (AAR) provides a valuable opportunity to review the statewide response to past drug use events, specifically the vaping crisis, using the MMH curriculum, which can systematically guide implementation strategy selection and deployment to meet identified gaps. The rationale for the proposed research is that designing and testing RAPD will advance implementation science in responding to urgent public health events and ensure equitable responses across youth populations.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05806840 .</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pilot and Feasibility Studies\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11748840/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pilot and Feasibility Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-024-01581-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pilot and Feasibility Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-024-01581-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:青少年吸毒趋势变化迅速,使干预专家难以及时作出反应。反应迟缓可导致可预防的发病率和死亡率。2019冠状病毒病大流行凸显了落实科学的必要性,以便利用现有的治疗和预防工作促进快速、公平的应对。现有的、广泛采用的循证干预措施;例如,密歇根卫生模式™(MMH)非常适合处理新出现的药物趋势。我们迫切需要推进实施战略,以优化系统对这些新出现的药物问题的响应能力。本研究旨在设计和测试实施策略,以(1)提高校本ebi在解决紧急问题方面的响应能力;(2)寻找支持教师实施更新的ebi的方法,并考虑到为经济困难学生服务的学校的独特考虑。方法:研究目标如下:目标1:使用定性方法,利用行动后审查(卫生组织在应对突发公共卫生事件时使用的一种反思过程)确定实施差距和最佳做法。目标2:根据目标1的发现设计和试点测试RAPD(快速适应以防止药物使用)。RAPD是指一套新的实施战略,旨在加强现有的、广泛采用的循证普遍预防课程的能力,以应对青年中新出现的毒品问题。我们将采用两组混合方法、聚类随机对照试验设计,在10所服务不同学生群体的中学进行RAPD试点测试。目标3:使用混合方法从多个合作伙伴的角度评估RAPD的成本和收益。讨论:本研究的重点是设计和部署实施策略,以减少新兴药物的有害影响,并提供基础设施,使未来的适应可以应用于其他情况。行动后审查(AAR)提供了一个宝贵的机会,可以使用MMH课程来审查全州对过去吸毒事件的反应,特别是电子烟危机,该课程可以系统地指导实施战略的选择和部署,以弥补已发现的差距。拟议研究的基本原理是,设计和测试RAPD将推进应对紧急公共卫生事件的实施科学,并确保在青年群体中公平应对。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05806840。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rapid Adaptation to Prevent Drug Use (RAPD): protocol of a pilot randomized trial to enhance the impact of an evidence-based intervention for youth.

Background: Drug use trends change rapidly among youth, leaving intervention experts struggling to respond promptly. Delays in responses can lead to preventable morbidity and mortality. The COVID-19 pandemic underscored the need for implementation science to facilitate rapid, equitable responses using existing treatment and prevention efforts. Existing, widely adopted evidence-based interventions (EBIs; e.g., the Michigan Model for Health™: MMH) are well suited to address emerging drug trends. We have a critical need to advance implementation strategies to optimize system responsiveness to these emerging drug issues. This research aims to design and test implementation strategies to (1) improve the responsiveness of school-based EBIs in addressing urgent issues and (2) find ways to support teachers in implementing updated EBIs, attending to unique considerations of schools serving economically disadvantaged students.

Methods: The research aims are as follows: aim 1: identify implementation gaps and best practices using After Action Review (a reflective process used by health organizations in responding to emergent public health events) using qualitative methods. Aim 2: design and pilot test RAPD (Rapid Adaptation to Prevent Drug use) based on aim 1 findings. RAPD refers to a novel set of implementation strategies designed to enhance the capacity of an existing, widely adopted evidence-based universal prevention curriculum (MMH) to respond to emerging drug issues among youth. We will pilot test RAPD in ten middle schools serving diverse student populations using a two-group, mixed method, cluster randomized controlled trial design. Aim 3: assess the costs and benefits of RAPD from multiple partner perspectives using a mixed methods approach.

Discussion: This study focuses on designing and deploying implementation strategies to reduce the detrimental impact of emerging drugs and provide an infrastructure to make future adaptations that can be applied in other contexts. After Action Review (AAR) provides a valuable opportunity to review the statewide response to past drug use events, specifically the vaping crisis, using the MMH curriculum, which can systematically guide implementation strategy selection and deployment to meet identified gaps. The rationale for the proposed research is that designing and testing RAPD will advance implementation science in responding to urgent public health events and ensure equitable responses across youth populations.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05806840 .

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
Pilot and Feasibility Studies Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
241
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Pilot and Feasibility Studies encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of pilot and feasibility studies in biomedicine. The journal publishes research articles that are intended to directly influence future clinical trials or large scale observational studies, as well as protocols, commentaries and methodology articles. The journal also ensures that the results of all well-conducted, peer-reviewed, pilot and feasibility studies are published, regardless of outcome or significance of findings. Pilot and feasibility studies are increasingly conducted prior to a full randomized controlled trial. However, these studies often lack clear objectives, many remain unpublished, and there is confusion over the meanings of the words “pilot” and “feasibility”. Pilot and Feasibility Studies provides a forum for discussion around this key aspect of the scientific process, and seeks to ensure that these studies are published, so as to complete the publication thread for clinical research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信