Omar Ragy, Wessam Abass, Durga Anil K Kanigicherla, Bethany Shinkins, Janine Bestall, Natalie King, Paul Brenchley, Alison Smith, Patrick Hamilton
{"title":"PLA2R自身抗体,肾病综合征和膜性肾病的多方面生物标志物。","authors":"Omar Ragy, Wessam Abass, Durga Anil K Kanigicherla, Bethany Shinkins, Janine Bestall, Natalie King, Paul Brenchley, Alison Smith, Patrick Hamilton","doi":"10.1093/ndt/gfaf012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The phospholipase A2 receptor antibody (PLA2R-Ab) test is a valuable first-line diagnostic tool for primary membranous nephropathy (MN), helping to identify PLA2R-related MN and potentially eliminating the need for a kidney biopsy in some individuals. By reducing the reliance on biopsies, the test streamlines diagnosis and improves patient care. However, determining the optimal PLA2R measurement method and cut-off is critical to maximizing the benefits of the test and minimizing any harms. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to evaluate serum- and urine-based biomarkers for distinguishing between PLA2R-related MN and non-PLA2R MN. Searches were conducted in databases including Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, International HTA Database and ClinicalTrials.gov. The methodology followed Cochrane-recommended guidelines for systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and the QUADAS-2 tool was utilized to assess the overall risk of bias. Ninety-one studies met the eligibility criteria for inclusion in the review. Of these, 38 studies reporting the accuracy of the PLA2R-Ab test using the EUROIMMUN enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method and 27 using the EUROIMMUN immunofluorescence (IF) method were suitable for meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of EUROIMMUN ELISA at a cut-off value of 20 RU/mL were 0.64 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.56-0.72] and 94.7% (95% CI 90.5-97.1%), respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of EUROIMMUN IF at a threshold of 1:10 was 0.69 (95% CI 0.637-0.739) and 0.98 (95% CI 0.931-0.994), respectively. Risk of bias was higher for studies evaluating the IF compared with ELISA test. We also explored whether the timing of the index test had an impact on the pooled diagnostic accuracy results; no significant differences were found. By evaluating the specificity and sensitivity of EUROIMMUN ELISA PLA2R-Ab and IF, we demonstrate that at ELISA levels ≥20 RU/mL, alongside thorough secondary screening, a kidney biopsy may be unnecessary. However, lower or negative levels still warrant a biopsy.</p>","PeriodicalId":19078,"journal":{"name":"Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":"1458-1469"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12315804/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PLA2R autoantibodies, a multifaceted biomarker in nephrotic syndrome and membranous nephropathy.\",\"authors\":\"Omar Ragy, Wessam Abass, Durga Anil K Kanigicherla, Bethany Shinkins, Janine Bestall, Natalie King, Paul Brenchley, Alison Smith, Patrick Hamilton\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ndt/gfaf012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The phospholipase A2 receptor antibody (PLA2R-Ab) test is a valuable first-line diagnostic tool for primary membranous nephropathy (MN), helping to identify PLA2R-related MN and potentially eliminating the need for a kidney biopsy in some individuals. By reducing the reliance on biopsies, the test streamlines diagnosis and improves patient care. However, determining the optimal PLA2R measurement method and cut-off is critical to maximizing the benefits of the test and minimizing any harms. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to evaluate serum- and urine-based biomarkers for distinguishing between PLA2R-related MN and non-PLA2R MN. Searches were conducted in databases including Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, International HTA Database and ClinicalTrials.gov. The methodology followed Cochrane-recommended guidelines for systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and the QUADAS-2 tool was utilized to assess the overall risk of bias. Ninety-one studies met the eligibility criteria for inclusion in the review. Of these, 38 studies reporting the accuracy of the PLA2R-Ab test using the EUROIMMUN enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method and 27 using the EUROIMMUN immunofluorescence (IF) method were suitable for meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of EUROIMMUN ELISA at a cut-off value of 20 RU/mL were 0.64 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.56-0.72] and 94.7% (95% CI 90.5-97.1%), respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of EUROIMMUN IF at a threshold of 1:10 was 0.69 (95% CI 0.637-0.739) and 0.98 (95% CI 0.931-0.994), respectively. Risk of bias was higher for studies evaluating the IF compared with ELISA test. We also explored whether the timing of the index test had an impact on the pooled diagnostic accuracy results; no significant differences were found. By evaluating the specificity and sensitivity of EUROIMMUN ELISA PLA2R-Ab and IF, we demonstrate that at ELISA levels ≥20 RU/mL, alongside thorough secondary screening, a kidney biopsy may be unnecessary. However, lower or negative levels still warrant a biopsy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19078,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1458-1469\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12315804/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfaf012\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPLANTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfaf012","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TRANSPLANTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
PLA2R autoantibodies, a multifaceted biomarker in nephrotic syndrome and membranous nephropathy.
The phospholipase A2 receptor antibody (PLA2R-Ab) test is a valuable first-line diagnostic tool for primary membranous nephropathy (MN), helping to identify PLA2R-related MN and potentially eliminating the need for a kidney biopsy in some individuals. By reducing the reliance on biopsies, the test streamlines diagnosis and improves patient care. However, determining the optimal PLA2R measurement method and cut-off is critical to maximizing the benefits of the test and minimizing any harms. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to evaluate serum- and urine-based biomarkers for distinguishing between PLA2R-related MN and non-PLA2R MN. Searches were conducted in databases including Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, International HTA Database and ClinicalTrials.gov. The methodology followed Cochrane-recommended guidelines for systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and the QUADAS-2 tool was utilized to assess the overall risk of bias. Ninety-one studies met the eligibility criteria for inclusion in the review. Of these, 38 studies reporting the accuracy of the PLA2R-Ab test using the EUROIMMUN enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method and 27 using the EUROIMMUN immunofluorescence (IF) method were suitable for meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of EUROIMMUN ELISA at a cut-off value of 20 RU/mL were 0.64 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.56-0.72] and 94.7% (95% CI 90.5-97.1%), respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of EUROIMMUN IF at a threshold of 1:10 was 0.69 (95% CI 0.637-0.739) and 0.98 (95% CI 0.931-0.994), respectively. Risk of bias was higher for studies evaluating the IF compared with ELISA test. We also explored whether the timing of the index test had an impact on the pooled diagnostic accuracy results; no significant differences were found. By evaluating the specificity and sensitivity of EUROIMMUN ELISA PLA2R-Ab and IF, we demonstrate that at ELISA levels ≥20 RU/mL, alongside thorough secondary screening, a kidney biopsy may be unnecessary. However, lower or negative levels still warrant a biopsy.
期刊介绍:
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation (ndt) is the leading nephrology journal in Europe and renowned worldwide, devoted to original clinical and laboratory research in nephrology, dialysis and transplantation. ndt is an official journal of the [ERA-EDTA](http://www.era-edta.org/) (European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association). Published monthly, the journal provides an essential resource for researchers and clinicians throughout the world. All research articles in this journal have undergone peer review.
Print ISSN: 0931-0509.