TEVAR治疗急性外伤性主动脉损伤:回顾性分析某一级创伤中心19例。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
F Liese-Landolt, H-C Pape, G N Jukema
{"title":"TEVAR治疗急性外伤性主动脉损伤:回顾性分析某一级创伤中心19例。","authors":"F Liese-Landolt, H-C Pape, G N Jukema","doi":"10.1007/s00423-025-03613-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Blunt traumatic aortic injury (TAI) is a critical condition and a leading cause of mortality in trauma patients, often resulting from high-speed accidents. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has developed into the preferred therapeutic approach due to its minimally invasive nature and promising outcomes. This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of TEVAR for managing TAI over a 10-year period at a Level-1 trauma center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 19 patients with acute TAI treated with TEVAR between 2012 and 2022 at the University Hospital Zurich. Data were collected from digital records and analyzed according to the Fillinger TEVAR reporting framework. Outcomes included technical success, perioperative complications, and long-term graft durability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort had a mean age of 39 years and included patients with severe polytrauma. Technical success was achieved in 95% of cases, with no intraoperative deaths or need for open surgical conversion. Perioperative complications were minimal, and the reintervention rate was 5.3%. This study evaluates 10 years of clinical experience managing TAI with TEVAR. Long-term follow-up, with a median duration of 29 months, revealed no graft-related complications or secondary interventions. Imaging confirmed sustained graft integrity, and clinical outcomes were favorable.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TEVAR is a reliable and effective treatment for traumatic aortic injuries, offering excellent technical success rates and minimal perioperative and long-term complications. This study highlights TEVAR's advantages in managing polytrauma patients and its role as a minimally invasive alternative to open surgery. Additionally, the findings emphasize the need for comprehensive long-term follow-up protocols. Future research should aim to address challenges related to device durability and the integration of advanced imaging techniques to further enhance patient outcomes and broaden the applicability of TEVAR in trauma care.</p>","PeriodicalId":17983,"journal":{"name":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","volume":"410 1","pages":"43"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11742738/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The treatment of acute traumatic aortic injuries with TEVAR: a retrospective analysis of 19 cases in a level-1 trauma center.\",\"authors\":\"F Liese-Landolt, H-C Pape, G N Jukema\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00423-025-03613-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Blunt traumatic aortic injury (TAI) is a critical condition and a leading cause of mortality in trauma patients, often resulting from high-speed accidents. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has developed into the preferred therapeutic approach due to its minimally invasive nature and promising outcomes. This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of TEVAR for managing TAI over a 10-year period at a Level-1 trauma center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 19 patients with acute TAI treated with TEVAR between 2012 and 2022 at the University Hospital Zurich. Data were collected from digital records and analyzed according to the Fillinger TEVAR reporting framework. Outcomes included technical success, perioperative complications, and long-term graft durability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort had a mean age of 39 years and included patients with severe polytrauma. Technical success was achieved in 95% of cases, with no intraoperative deaths or need for open surgical conversion. Perioperative complications were minimal, and the reintervention rate was 5.3%. This study evaluates 10 years of clinical experience managing TAI with TEVAR. Long-term follow-up, with a median duration of 29 months, revealed no graft-related complications or secondary interventions. Imaging confirmed sustained graft integrity, and clinical outcomes were favorable.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TEVAR is a reliable and effective treatment for traumatic aortic injuries, offering excellent technical success rates and minimal perioperative and long-term complications. This study highlights TEVAR's advantages in managing polytrauma patients and its role as a minimally invasive alternative to open surgery. Additionally, the findings emphasize the need for comprehensive long-term follow-up protocols. Future research should aim to address challenges related to device durability and the integration of advanced imaging techniques to further enhance patient outcomes and broaden the applicability of TEVAR in trauma care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17983,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery\",\"volume\":\"410 1\",\"pages\":\"43\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11742738/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-025-03613-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-025-03613-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

钝性外伤性主动脉损伤(TAI)是创伤患者的一种危重疾病,也是导致死亡的主要原因,通常由高速交通事故引起。胸主动脉血管内修复术(TEVAR)因其微创性和良好的治疗效果而成为首选的治疗方法。本研究评估了TEVAR在一级创伤中心治疗TAI的10年期间的安全性和有效性。方法:回顾性分析2012年至2022年在苏黎世大学医院接受TEVAR治疗的19例急性TAI患者。数据从数字记录中收集,并根据Fillinger TEVAR报告框架进行分析。结果包括技术成功、围手术期并发症和长期移植物耐久性。结果:该队列平均年龄为39岁,包括严重多发伤患者。95%的病例获得了技术上的成功,无术中死亡或需要开放手术转换。围手术期并发症极少,再干预率为5.3%。这项研究评估了10年来用TEVAR治疗TAI的临床经验。长期随访中位时间为29个月,未发现移植物相关并发症或二次干预。影像学证实移植物持续完整,临床结果良好。结论:TEVAR治疗外伤性主动脉损伤可靠有效,技术成功率高,围手术期和远期并发症少。本研究强调了TEVAR在治疗多发创伤患者中的优势及其作为开放手术的微创替代方案的作用。此外,研究结果强调需要全面的长期随访方案。未来的研究应着眼于解决与设备耐久性和先进成像技术集成相关的挑战,以进一步提高患者的治疗效果,扩大TEVAR在创伤护理中的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The treatment of acute traumatic aortic injuries with TEVAR: a retrospective analysis of 19 cases in a level-1 trauma center.

Introduction: Blunt traumatic aortic injury (TAI) is a critical condition and a leading cause of mortality in trauma patients, often resulting from high-speed accidents. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has developed into the preferred therapeutic approach due to its minimally invasive nature and promising outcomes. This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of TEVAR for managing TAI over a 10-year period at a Level-1 trauma center.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 19 patients with acute TAI treated with TEVAR between 2012 and 2022 at the University Hospital Zurich. Data were collected from digital records and analyzed according to the Fillinger TEVAR reporting framework. Outcomes included technical success, perioperative complications, and long-term graft durability.

Results: The cohort had a mean age of 39 years and included patients with severe polytrauma. Technical success was achieved in 95% of cases, with no intraoperative deaths or need for open surgical conversion. Perioperative complications were minimal, and the reintervention rate was 5.3%. This study evaluates 10 years of clinical experience managing TAI with TEVAR. Long-term follow-up, with a median duration of 29 months, revealed no graft-related complications or secondary interventions. Imaging confirmed sustained graft integrity, and clinical outcomes were favorable.

Conclusion: TEVAR is a reliable and effective treatment for traumatic aortic injuries, offering excellent technical success rates and minimal perioperative and long-term complications. This study highlights TEVAR's advantages in managing polytrauma patients and its role as a minimally invasive alternative to open surgery. Additionally, the findings emphasize the need for comprehensive long-term follow-up protocols. Future research should aim to address challenges related to device durability and the integration of advanced imaging techniques to further enhance patient outcomes and broaden the applicability of TEVAR in trauma care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.70%
发文量
342
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Langenbeck''s Archives of Surgery aims to publish the best results in the field of clinical surgery and basic surgical research. The main focus is on providing the highest level of clinical research and clinically relevant basic research. The journal, published exclusively in English, will provide an international discussion forum for the controlled results of clinical surgery. The majority of published contributions will be original articles reporting on clinical data from general and visceral surgery, while endocrine surgery will also be covered. Papers on basic surgical principles from the fields of traumatology, vascular and thoracic surgery are also welcome. Evidence-based medicine is an important criterion for the acceptance of papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信