{"title":"麻醉方法及快速现场评价对支气管超声引导下经支气管针吸诊断肺癌的影响:回顾性研究。","authors":"Yu-He Hu, Wen-Hui Xu, Yu-Ying Li","doi":"10.21037/jtd-24-1117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is a critical method for diagnosing lung cancer. While EBUS-TBNA is commonly performed under conscious sedation, the potential benefits of conducting the procedure under general anesthesia and incorporating rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) to enhance diagnostic yield remain uncertain. This study aims to investigate the impact of anesthesia methods and ROSE on the diagnostic efficacy of EBUS-TBNA for lung cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study collected data from patients who underwent EBUS-TBNA for suspected lung cancer in the Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine at The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University from August 2018 to December 2023. Patients were categorized into three groups based on the anesthesia method used and whether ROSE was performed: the non-general anesthesia group (NGA group), the general anesthesia group (GA group), and the general anesthesia with ROSE group (RGA group). The study analyzed baseline characteristics, puncture details, diagnostic outcomes, and complications across the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The number of puncture needles used in the RGA group was significantly lower than in the other two groups (P<0.001). Most patients received a definitive diagnosis, with malignant tumor diagnostic rates of 80.95%, 85.71%, and 93.44% in the NGA, GA, and RGA groups, respectively (P=0.12). The overall disease diagnostic rates were 76.06%, 79.22%, and 86.11%, respectively (P=0.30). No severe complications occurred in any of the groups. The proportion of patients willing to undergo repeat EBUS-TBNA was significantly lower in the NGA group compared to the other two groups (P=0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared to local anesthesia combined with intravenous analgesia and sedation or general anesthesia alone, general anesthesia combined with ROSE reduces the number of puncture needles required during EBUS-TBNA but does not further improve diagnostic efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":17542,"journal":{"name":"Journal of thoracic disease","volume":"16 12","pages":"8493-8502"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11740067/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of anesthesia methods and rapid on-site evaluation on the diagnosis of lung cancer using endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration: a retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Yu-He Hu, Wen-Hui Xu, Yu-Ying Li\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/jtd-24-1117\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is a critical method for diagnosing lung cancer. While EBUS-TBNA is commonly performed under conscious sedation, the potential benefits of conducting the procedure under general anesthesia and incorporating rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) to enhance diagnostic yield remain uncertain. This study aims to investigate the impact of anesthesia methods and ROSE on the diagnostic efficacy of EBUS-TBNA for lung cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study collected data from patients who underwent EBUS-TBNA for suspected lung cancer in the Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine at The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University from August 2018 to December 2023. Patients were categorized into three groups based on the anesthesia method used and whether ROSE was performed: the non-general anesthesia group (NGA group), the general anesthesia group (GA group), and the general anesthesia with ROSE group (RGA group). The study analyzed baseline characteristics, puncture details, diagnostic outcomes, and complications across the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The number of puncture needles used in the RGA group was significantly lower than in the other two groups (P<0.001). Most patients received a definitive diagnosis, with malignant tumor diagnostic rates of 80.95%, 85.71%, and 93.44% in the NGA, GA, and RGA groups, respectively (P=0.12). The overall disease diagnostic rates were 76.06%, 79.22%, and 86.11%, respectively (P=0.30). No severe complications occurred in any of the groups. The proportion of patients willing to undergo repeat EBUS-TBNA was significantly lower in the NGA group compared to the other two groups (P=0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared to local anesthesia combined with intravenous analgesia and sedation or general anesthesia alone, general anesthesia combined with ROSE reduces the number of puncture needles required during EBUS-TBNA but does not further improve diagnostic efficacy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of thoracic disease\",\"volume\":\"16 12\",\"pages\":\"8493-8502\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11740067/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of thoracic disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd-24-1117\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of thoracic disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd-24-1117","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
The impact of anesthesia methods and rapid on-site evaluation on the diagnosis of lung cancer using endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration: a retrospective study.
Background: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is a critical method for diagnosing lung cancer. While EBUS-TBNA is commonly performed under conscious sedation, the potential benefits of conducting the procedure under general anesthesia and incorporating rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) to enhance diagnostic yield remain uncertain. This study aims to investigate the impact of anesthesia methods and ROSE on the diagnostic efficacy of EBUS-TBNA for lung cancer.
Methods: This study collected data from patients who underwent EBUS-TBNA for suspected lung cancer in the Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine at The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University from August 2018 to December 2023. Patients were categorized into three groups based on the anesthesia method used and whether ROSE was performed: the non-general anesthesia group (NGA group), the general anesthesia group (GA group), and the general anesthesia with ROSE group (RGA group). The study analyzed baseline characteristics, puncture details, diagnostic outcomes, and complications across the groups.
Results: The number of puncture needles used in the RGA group was significantly lower than in the other two groups (P<0.001). Most patients received a definitive diagnosis, with malignant tumor diagnostic rates of 80.95%, 85.71%, and 93.44% in the NGA, GA, and RGA groups, respectively (P=0.12). The overall disease diagnostic rates were 76.06%, 79.22%, and 86.11%, respectively (P=0.30). No severe complications occurred in any of the groups. The proportion of patients willing to undergo repeat EBUS-TBNA was significantly lower in the NGA group compared to the other two groups (P=0.002).
Conclusions: Compared to local anesthesia combined with intravenous analgesia and sedation or general anesthesia alone, general anesthesia combined with ROSE reduces the number of puncture needles required during EBUS-TBNA but does not further improve diagnostic efficacy.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Thoracic Disease (JTD, J Thorac Dis, pISSN: 2072-1439; eISSN: 2077-6624) was founded in Dec 2009, and indexed in PubMed in Dec 2011 and Science Citation Index SCI in Feb 2013. It is published quarterly (Dec 2009- Dec 2011), bimonthly (Jan 2012 - Dec 2013), monthly (Jan. 2014-) and openly distributed worldwide. JTD received its impact factor of 2.365 for the year 2016. JTD publishes manuscripts that describe new findings and provide current, practical information on the diagnosis and treatment of conditions related to thoracic disease. All the submission and reviewing are conducted electronically so that rapid review is assured.