新诊断和/或失代偿性心力衰竭的无症状患者颈动脉血运重建术30天卒中/死亡率超过血管学会指南风险。

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Renxi Li, Anton N Sidawy, Bao-Ngoc H Nguyen
{"title":"新诊断和/或失代偿性心力衰竭的无症状患者颈动脉血运重建术30天卒中/死亡率超过血管学会指南风险。","authors":"Renxi Li, Anton N Sidawy, Bao-Ngoc H Nguyen","doi":"10.1016/j.jvs.2025.01.032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>According to the latest Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) guidelines, carotid revascularization for asymptomatic individuals should be offered if the perioperative stroke/death rate does not exceed 3%. Heart failure (HF) has been associated with reduced survival rates following carotid revascularization, which may significantly impact the risk-benefit decision of treating asymptomatic patients with HF. This study aimed to evaluate the 30-day postoperative risks in asymptomatic patients with newly diagnosed and/or decompensated HF undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Asymptomatic patients who underwent CEA and CAS were identified in the ACS-NSQIP targeted databases from 2011-2023. HF was defined as newly diagnosed HF and/or an acute exacerbation of chronic HF within 30 days of the surgery A 1:3 propensity-score matching was used to balance preoperative differences between HF and non-HF patients. Patients who underwent CEA and CAS were analyzed separately. Thirty-day postoperative outcomes were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 23,274 patients who underwent CEA, where 601 (2.58%) had HF, who were matched to 1,803 non-HF patients. Among 1,361 patients who underwent CAS, 87 (6.38%) had HF and were matched to 222 non-HF counterparts. HF patients had a much higher comorbidity burden. After CEA, HF patients had higher risks of stroke/mortality (4.83% vs 2.55%, p=0.01), cardiac (6.66% vs 3.38%, p<0.01), pulmonary (4.49% vs 2.44%, p=0.02), and renal complications (1.66% vs 0.44%, p=0.01), as well as sepsis (1.50% vs 0.44%, p=0.02), distal embolization (0.50% vs 0.00%, p=0.02), unplanned operation (5.99% vs 3.49%, p=0.01), prolonged hospital stay (p<0.01), and 30-day readmission (13.14% vs 8.65%, p<0.01). After CAS, HF patients had similarly high risks of stroke/mortality (5.75% vs. 3.60%, p=0.53).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For newly diagnosed and/or decompensated HF patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis, the 30-day postoperative stroke/mortality risks after both CEA and CAS greatly exceed the SVS guideline recommendations. Coupled with the substantially higher risk of other major complications, the decision to pursue surgical revascularization in asymptomatic patients with HF should be approached with extreme caution, and conservative management may be prioritized.</p>","PeriodicalId":17475,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thirty-day stroke/mortality of carotid revascularization in asymptomatic patients with newly diagnosed and/or decompensated heart failure exceeds the Society for Vascular Society guideline risks.\",\"authors\":\"Renxi Li, Anton N Sidawy, Bao-Ngoc H Nguyen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jvs.2025.01.032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>According to the latest Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) guidelines, carotid revascularization for asymptomatic individuals should be offered if the perioperative stroke/death rate does not exceed 3%. Heart failure (HF) has been associated with reduced survival rates following carotid revascularization, which may significantly impact the risk-benefit decision of treating asymptomatic patients with HF. This study aimed to evaluate the 30-day postoperative risks in asymptomatic patients with newly diagnosed and/or decompensated HF undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Asymptomatic patients who underwent CEA and CAS were identified in the ACS-NSQIP targeted databases from 2011-2023. HF was defined as newly diagnosed HF and/or an acute exacerbation of chronic HF within 30 days of the surgery A 1:3 propensity-score matching was used to balance preoperative differences between HF and non-HF patients. Patients who underwent CEA and CAS were analyzed separately. Thirty-day postoperative outcomes were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 23,274 patients who underwent CEA, where 601 (2.58%) had HF, who were matched to 1,803 non-HF patients. Among 1,361 patients who underwent CAS, 87 (6.38%) had HF and were matched to 222 non-HF counterparts. HF patients had a much higher comorbidity burden. After CEA, HF patients had higher risks of stroke/mortality (4.83% vs 2.55%, p=0.01), cardiac (6.66% vs 3.38%, p<0.01), pulmonary (4.49% vs 2.44%, p=0.02), and renal complications (1.66% vs 0.44%, p=0.01), as well as sepsis (1.50% vs 0.44%, p=0.02), distal embolization (0.50% vs 0.00%, p=0.02), unplanned operation (5.99% vs 3.49%, p=0.01), prolonged hospital stay (p<0.01), and 30-day readmission (13.14% vs 8.65%, p<0.01). After CAS, HF patients had similarly high risks of stroke/mortality (5.75% vs. 3.60%, p=0.53).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For newly diagnosed and/or decompensated HF patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis, the 30-day postoperative stroke/mortality risks after both CEA and CAS greatly exceed the SVS guideline recommendations. Coupled with the substantially higher risk of other major complications, the decision to pursue surgical revascularization in asymptomatic patients with HF should be approached with extreme caution, and conservative management may be prioritized.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17475,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vascular Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2025.01.032\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2025.01.032","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:根据最新的血管外科学会(SVS)指南,如果围手术期卒中/死亡率不超过3%,则应该对无症状患者进行颈动脉血运重建术。心衰(HF)与颈动脉血运重建术后生存率降低相关,这可能显著影响治疗无症状心衰患者的风险-收益决策。本研究旨在评估新诊断和/或失代偿HF的无症状患者接受颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)和颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)后30天的风险。方法:2011-2023年在ACS-NSQIP目标数据库中筛选经CEA和CAS治疗的无症状患者。HF定义为手术后30天内新诊断的HF和/或慢性HF急性加重,采用1:3倾向评分匹配来平衡HF和非HF患者的术前差异。分别对CEA和CAS患者进行分析。观察术后30天的预后。结果:有23274例患者接受了CEA,其中601例(2.58%)患有HF,与1803例非HF患者相匹配。在1361例接受CAS的患者中,87例(6.38%)患有HF,并与222例非HF配对。心衰患者有更高的合并症负担。结论:对于新诊断和/或失代偿期合并无症状颈动脉狭窄的HF患者,CEA和CAS术后30天卒中/死亡风险均大大超过SVS指南推荐。再加上其他主要并发症的风险较高,在无症状心衰患者中进行外科血运重建术的决定应非常谨慎,并可能优先考虑保守治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Thirty-day stroke/mortality of carotid revascularization in asymptomatic patients with newly diagnosed and/or decompensated heart failure exceeds the Society for Vascular Society guideline risks.

Background: According to the latest Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) guidelines, carotid revascularization for asymptomatic individuals should be offered if the perioperative stroke/death rate does not exceed 3%. Heart failure (HF) has been associated with reduced survival rates following carotid revascularization, which may significantly impact the risk-benefit decision of treating asymptomatic patients with HF. This study aimed to evaluate the 30-day postoperative risks in asymptomatic patients with newly diagnosed and/or decompensated HF undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS).

Methods: Asymptomatic patients who underwent CEA and CAS were identified in the ACS-NSQIP targeted databases from 2011-2023. HF was defined as newly diagnosed HF and/or an acute exacerbation of chronic HF within 30 days of the surgery A 1:3 propensity-score matching was used to balance preoperative differences between HF and non-HF patients. Patients who underwent CEA and CAS were analyzed separately. Thirty-day postoperative outcomes were examined.

Results: There were 23,274 patients who underwent CEA, where 601 (2.58%) had HF, who were matched to 1,803 non-HF patients. Among 1,361 patients who underwent CAS, 87 (6.38%) had HF and were matched to 222 non-HF counterparts. HF patients had a much higher comorbidity burden. After CEA, HF patients had higher risks of stroke/mortality (4.83% vs 2.55%, p=0.01), cardiac (6.66% vs 3.38%, p<0.01), pulmonary (4.49% vs 2.44%, p=0.02), and renal complications (1.66% vs 0.44%, p=0.01), as well as sepsis (1.50% vs 0.44%, p=0.02), distal embolization (0.50% vs 0.00%, p=0.02), unplanned operation (5.99% vs 3.49%, p=0.01), prolonged hospital stay (p<0.01), and 30-day readmission (13.14% vs 8.65%, p<0.01). After CAS, HF patients had similarly high risks of stroke/mortality (5.75% vs. 3.60%, p=0.53).

Conclusion: For newly diagnosed and/or decompensated HF patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis, the 30-day postoperative stroke/mortality risks after both CEA and CAS greatly exceed the SVS guideline recommendations. Coupled with the substantially higher risk of other major complications, the decision to pursue surgical revascularization in asymptomatic patients with HF should be approached with extreme caution, and conservative management may be prioritized.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
18.60%
发文量
1469
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Vascular Surgery ® aims to be the premier international journal of medical, endovascular and surgical care of vascular diseases. It is dedicated to the science and art of vascular surgery and aims to improve the management of patients with vascular diseases by publishing relevant papers that report important medical advances, test new hypotheses, and address current controversies. To acheive this goal, the Journal will publish original clinical and laboratory studies, and reports and papers that comment on the social, economic, ethical, legal, and political factors, which relate to these aims. As the official publication of The Society for Vascular Surgery, the Journal will publish, after peer review, selected papers presented at the annual meeting of this organization and affiliated vascular societies, as well as original articles from members and non-members.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信