血管质量倡议中外周血管干预设备选择的噪声审计。

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
William K Robinson, Peter W Callas, Jens Eldrup-Jorgensen, Daniel J Bertges
{"title":"血管质量倡议中外周血管干预设备选择的噪声审计。","authors":"William K Robinson, Peter W Callas, Jens Eldrup-Jorgensen, Daniel J Bertges","doi":"10.1016/j.jvs.2025.01.031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To conduct a \"Noise Audit\" of the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) Peripheral Vascular Intervention (PVI) Registry to analyze variation in device selection for similar patients and anatomies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study analysis of the VQI PVI Registry. Eight clinical-based, and seven lesion-based scenarios were developed, and the VQI was queried for all procedures matching these descriptions from December 2010 to December 2021. All patients undergoing PVI for either claudication or chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI) were included. Device selection was then identified for each procedure, with a treatment hierarchy to designate the primary device class along with a separate accounting of specialty balloons including drug coated and lithoplasty devices. Variability was then quantified in each mock patient scenario using the most commonly used device as the reference standard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The number of patients matching the criteria for each mock scenario ranged from 223-1,379 across eight clinical and from 6,166-26,241 in seven lesion-based scenarios. The most commonly used device in a given patient scenario was used between 32% and 72% of procedures in the clinical based scenarios, and between 34% and 67% of procedures in the lesion-based scenarios. Variation in device selection and use of specialty balloons were found to be significant across all patient scenarios (P <0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Noise in PVI device selection and use of drug coated balloons in the VQI was significant across 15 mock scenarios. This indicates that similar patients with similar vascular pathologies are receiving vastly different devices and confirms that future comparative effectiveness studies are required to more effectively combat this systemic source of Noise in device selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":17475,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Noise Audit of Device Selection for Peripheral Vascular Interventions in the Vascular Quality Initiative.\",\"authors\":\"William K Robinson, Peter W Callas, Jens Eldrup-Jorgensen, Daniel J Bertges\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jvs.2025.01.031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To conduct a \\\"Noise Audit\\\" of the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) Peripheral Vascular Intervention (PVI) Registry to analyze variation in device selection for similar patients and anatomies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study analysis of the VQI PVI Registry. Eight clinical-based, and seven lesion-based scenarios were developed, and the VQI was queried for all procedures matching these descriptions from December 2010 to December 2021. All patients undergoing PVI for either claudication or chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI) were included. Device selection was then identified for each procedure, with a treatment hierarchy to designate the primary device class along with a separate accounting of specialty balloons including drug coated and lithoplasty devices. Variability was then quantified in each mock patient scenario using the most commonly used device as the reference standard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The number of patients matching the criteria for each mock scenario ranged from 223-1,379 across eight clinical and from 6,166-26,241 in seven lesion-based scenarios. The most commonly used device in a given patient scenario was used between 32% and 72% of procedures in the clinical based scenarios, and between 34% and 67% of procedures in the lesion-based scenarios. Variation in device selection and use of specialty balloons were found to be significant across all patient scenarios (P <0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Noise in PVI device selection and use of drug coated balloons in the VQI was significant across 15 mock scenarios. This indicates that similar patients with similar vascular pathologies are receiving vastly different devices and confirms that future comparative effectiveness studies are required to more effectively combat this systemic source of Noise in device selection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17475,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vascular Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2025.01.031\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2025.01.031","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:对血管质量倡议(VQI)外周血管介入(PVI)登记进行“噪声审计”,分析相似患者和解剖结构在器械选择上的差异。方法:我们对VQI PVI注册表进行回顾性队列研究分析。开发了8个基于临床和7个基于病变的场景,并查询了2010年12月至2021年12月期间符合这些描述的所有手术的VQI。所有因跛行或慢性肢体威胁缺血(CLTI)而接受PVI的患者均被纳入研究。然后为每个手术确定设备选择,并使用治疗层次来指定主要设备类别,以及包括药物涂层和lithoplasty设备在内的特殊气球的单独核算。然后使用最常用的设备作为参考标准,对每个模拟患者场景中的变异性进行量化。结果:符合每个模拟情景标准的患者数量在8个临床中为223-1,379,在7个基于病变的情景中为6166 -26,241。在给定的患者情况下,最常用的设备在基于临床的情况下使用32%至72%的手术,在基于病变的情况下使用34%至67%的手术。结论:在15种模拟情况下,PVI设备选择和VQI中药物包覆气球的使用的噪声在15种模拟情况下都是显著的。这表明具有相似血管病变的类似患者正在接受截然不同的设备,并证实需要进行未来的比较有效性研究,以更有效地对抗设备选择中的这种系统性噪声源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Noise Audit of Device Selection for Peripheral Vascular Interventions in the Vascular Quality Initiative.

Objective: To conduct a "Noise Audit" of the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) Peripheral Vascular Intervention (PVI) Registry to analyze variation in device selection for similar patients and anatomies.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study analysis of the VQI PVI Registry. Eight clinical-based, and seven lesion-based scenarios were developed, and the VQI was queried for all procedures matching these descriptions from December 2010 to December 2021. All patients undergoing PVI for either claudication or chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI) were included. Device selection was then identified for each procedure, with a treatment hierarchy to designate the primary device class along with a separate accounting of specialty balloons including drug coated and lithoplasty devices. Variability was then quantified in each mock patient scenario using the most commonly used device as the reference standard.

Results: The number of patients matching the criteria for each mock scenario ranged from 223-1,379 across eight clinical and from 6,166-26,241 in seven lesion-based scenarios. The most commonly used device in a given patient scenario was used between 32% and 72% of procedures in the clinical based scenarios, and between 34% and 67% of procedures in the lesion-based scenarios. Variation in device selection and use of specialty balloons were found to be significant across all patient scenarios (P <0.0001).

Conclusion: Noise in PVI device selection and use of drug coated balloons in the VQI was significant across 15 mock scenarios. This indicates that similar patients with similar vascular pathologies are receiving vastly different devices and confirms that future comparative effectiveness studies are required to more effectively combat this systemic source of Noise in device selection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
18.60%
发文量
1469
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Vascular Surgery ® aims to be the premier international journal of medical, endovascular and surgical care of vascular diseases. It is dedicated to the science and art of vascular surgery and aims to improve the management of patients with vascular diseases by publishing relevant papers that report important medical advances, test new hypotheses, and address current controversies. To acheive this goal, the Journal will publish original clinical and laboratory studies, and reports and papers that comment on the social, economic, ethical, legal, and political factors, which relate to these aims. As the official publication of The Society for Vascular Surgery, the Journal will publish, after peer review, selected papers presented at the annual meeting of this organization and affiliated vascular societies, as well as original articles from members and non-members.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信