机器人辅助微创椎间孔融合术:一个完整的工作流程试点可行性研究。

Q1 Medicine
Journal of spine surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-20 Epub Date: 2024-12-17 DOI:10.21037/jss-24-70
Joseph Jon Yin Wan, Yong Yao Tan, Justin Rui Xin Ker, Shree Kumar Dinesh
{"title":"机器人辅助微创椎间孔融合术:一个完整的工作流程试点可行性研究。","authors":"Joseph Jon Yin Wan, Yong Yao Tan, Justin Rui Xin Ker, Shree Kumar Dinesh","doi":"10.21037/jss-24-70","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Robotic-assisted spinal surgery has reportedly improved the accuracy of instrumentation with smaller incisions, improving surgical outcomes and reducing hospital stay. However, robot-assisted spine surgery has thus far been confined to placement of pedicle screw instrumentation only. This pilot study aims to explore the feasibility of utilizing the Mazor™ X Stealth Edition (Medtronic, Sofamor Danek USA), robotic-arm platform in the minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) procedure inclusive of interbody cage placement, in our institution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Single-centre, single surgeon prospectively collected case series of 29 patients who were planned for robot-assisted MIS-TLIF (RA-TLIF) with Mazor™ X Stealth system, on patient demographics [age, gender, body mass index (BMI), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI)], and post-operative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 29 RA-TLIF cases planned, 2 cases were excluded due to software start-up issues. One patient underwent revision surgery for posterior-migrated interbody cage. No loosening of posterior instrumentation was seen in all cases at 6 months follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our single-institution pilot study on the Mazor™ X Stealth RA-TLIF has shown high pedicle screw insertion accuracy and relatively low complication rates, comparable to that of conventional MIS-TLIF O-arm navigation system. However, the discerning surgeon should be on the lookout for potential system-related pitfalls, as well as understand the limitations for robotic interbody cage placement. Further studies will also be required on patient outcomes and cost-effectiveness prior to consideration for wide scale implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":17131,"journal":{"name":"Journal of spine surgery","volume":"10 4","pages":"653-662"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11732329/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Robot-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion: a complete workflow pilot feasibility study.\",\"authors\":\"Joseph Jon Yin Wan, Yong Yao Tan, Justin Rui Xin Ker, Shree Kumar Dinesh\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/jss-24-70\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Robotic-assisted spinal surgery has reportedly improved the accuracy of instrumentation with smaller incisions, improving surgical outcomes and reducing hospital stay. However, robot-assisted spine surgery has thus far been confined to placement of pedicle screw instrumentation only. This pilot study aims to explore the feasibility of utilizing the Mazor™ X Stealth Edition (Medtronic, Sofamor Danek USA), robotic-arm platform in the minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) procedure inclusive of interbody cage placement, in our institution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Single-centre, single surgeon prospectively collected case series of 29 patients who were planned for robot-assisted MIS-TLIF (RA-TLIF) with Mazor™ X Stealth system, on patient demographics [age, gender, body mass index (BMI), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI)], and post-operative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 29 RA-TLIF cases planned, 2 cases were excluded due to software start-up issues. One patient underwent revision surgery for posterior-migrated interbody cage. No loosening of posterior instrumentation was seen in all cases at 6 months follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our single-institution pilot study on the Mazor™ X Stealth RA-TLIF has shown high pedicle screw insertion accuracy and relatively low complication rates, comparable to that of conventional MIS-TLIF O-arm navigation system. However, the discerning surgeon should be on the lookout for potential system-related pitfalls, as well as understand the limitations for robotic interbody cage placement. Further studies will also be required on patient outcomes and cost-effectiveness prior to consideration for wide scale implementation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of spine surgery\",\"volume\":\"10 4\",\"pages\":\"653-662\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11732329/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of spine surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/jss-24-70\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of spine surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jss-24-70","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:据报道,机器人辅助脊柱手术以更小的切口提高了内固定的准确性,改善了手术效果并减少了住院时间。然而,迄今为止,机器人辅助脊柱手术仅局限于椎弓根螺钉置入。本初步研究旨在探讨Mazor™X Stealth Edition (Medtronic, Sofamor Danek USA)机械臂平台在我院微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(MIS-TLIF)包括椎间笼置入的可行性。方法:单中心、单外科医生前瞻性收集29例患者的病例系列,这些患者计划使用Mazor™X Stealth系统进行机器人辅助MIS-TLIF (RA-TLIF),患者人口统计学[年龄、性别、体重指数(BMI)、Charlson合并症指数(CCI)]和术后结果。结果:在计划的29例RA-TLIF病例中,2例因软件启动问题被排除。1例患者行后移椎间笼翻修手术。随访6个月,所有病例均未见后路内固定松动。结论:我们对Mazor™X Stealth RA-TLIF的单机构试点研究显示,与传统的MIS-TLIF o臂导航系统相比,Mazor™X Stealth RA-TLIF具有较高的椎弓根螺钉置入精度和相对较低的并发症发生率。然而,有眼光的外科医生应该注意潜在的系统相关缺陷,并了解机器人椎间笼放置的局限性。在考虑大规模实施之前,还需要对患者结果和成本效益进行进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Robot-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion: a complete workflow pilot feasibility study.

Background: Robotic-assisted spinal surgery has reportedly improved the accuracy of instrumentation with smaller incisions, improving surgical outcomes and reducing hospital stay. However, robot-assisted spine surgery has thus far been confined to placement of pedicle screw instrumentation only. This pilot study aims to explore the feasibility of utilizing the Mazor™ X Stealth Edition (Medtronic, Sofamor Danek USA), robotic-arm platform in the minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) procedure inclusive of interbody cage placement, in our institution.

Methods: Single-centre, single surgeon prospectively collected case series of 29 patients who were planned for robot-assisted MIS-TLIF (RA-TLIF) with Mazor™ X Stealth system, on patient demographics [age, gender, body mass index (BMI), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI)], and post-operative outcomes.

Results: Of the 29 RA-TLIF cases planned, 2 cases were excluded due to software start-up issues. One patient underwent revision surgery for posterior-migrated interbody cage. No loosening of posterior instrumentation was seen in all cases at 6 months follow-up.

Conclusions: Our single-institution pilot study on the Mazor™ X Stealth RA-TLIF has shown high pedicle screw insertion accuracy and relatively low complication rates, comparable to that of conventional MIS-TLIF O-arm navigation system. However, the discerning surgeon should be on the lookout for potential system-related pitfalls, as well as understand the limitations for robotic interbody cage placement. Further studies will also be required on patient outcomes and cost-effectiveness prior to consideration for wide scale implementation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of spine surgery
Journal of spine surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信