微创俯卧侧位胸膜后或腹膜后进路脊柱手术,采用可旋转的透光Jackson手术台。

Q1 Medicine
Journal of spine surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-20 Epub Date: 2024-12-17 DOI:10.21037/jss-24-71
Yu-Cheng Yeh, Yung-Hsueh Hu, Ping-Yeh Chiu, Fu-Cheng Kao, Ming-Kai Hsieh, Chia-Wei Yu, Tsung-Ting Tsai, Po-Liang Lai, Tsai-Sheng Fu, Chi-Chien Niu, Lih-Huei Chen, Wen-Jer Chen
{"title":"微创俯卧侧位胸膜后或腹膜后进路脊柱手术,采用可旋转的透光Jackson手术台。","authors":"Yu-Cheng Yeh, Yung-Hsueh Hu, Ping-Yeh Chiu, Fu-Cheng Kao, Ming-Kai Hsieh, Chia-Wei Yu, Tsung-Ting Tsai, Po-Liang Lai, Tsai-Sheng Fu, Chi-Chien Niu, Lih-Huei Chen, Wen-Jer Chen","doi":"10.21037/jss-24-71","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prone lateral spinal surgery for simultaneous lateral and posterior approaches has recently been proposed to facilitate surgical room efficiency. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and outcomes of minimally invasive prone lateral spinal surgery using a rotatable radiolucent Jackson table.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From July 2021 to June 2023, a consecutive series of patients who received minimally invasive prone lateral spinal surgery for various etiologies by the same surgical team were reviewed. A Mizuho Jackson Modular Table System was used for all prone lateral surgeries. All patients received combined lateral and posterior approach surgery on the same day. The lateral approaches were performed with the Jackson table rotated 30-40 degrees away from the surgical side. A table-mounted oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) retractor was applied in retropleural/retroperitoneal spaces. Minimally invasive lateral procedures such as discectomy or mini-open corpectomy were performed after adequate exposure. Posterior procedures were performed with the Jackson table rotated back horizontally. The disease etiologies, surgical levels, blood loss, operation time, and surgical procedures were collected and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 64 patients with a mean age of 61.8 years (range, 26-88 years). The disease etiologies were 11 (17.2%) deformities, 15 (23.4%) degenerations, 25 (39.1%) infections, 9 (14.1%) traumas, and 4 (6.3%) tumors. The mean length of the surgical level was 4.1±2.0 (range, 2-10), with surgical levels ranging from T8 to L5 laterally and T6 to the ilium posteriorly. The mean blood loss was 863±843 mL (range, 50-4,600 mL) and the mean operation time was 314±148 minutes (range, 92-785 minutes). Of the lateral approaches, there were 25 retropleural and 39 retroperitoneal approaches (36 antepsoas approach). Surgical procedures performed included lateral discectomies, mini-open corpectomies, interbody reconstruction and fusion, and various posterior techniques such as pedicle screw instrumentation, cement augmentation, decompression, osteotomy, and spinal endoscopy. Patients who received both prone lateral retropleural and retroperitoneal approaches had significant improvement in the sagittal Cobb angle of the lateral surgical level, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at 1 year postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Minimally invasive prone lateral spinal surgery is a feasible option for patients requiring combined lateral and posterior approach spinal surgery. Both lateral retropleural and retroperitoneal antepsoas approaches can be applied in combination with various posterior surgical procedures in the prone position using the rotatable radiolucent Jackson table.</p>","PeriodicalId":17131,"journal":{"name":"Journal of spine surgery","volume":"10 4","pages":"663-679"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11732327/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Minimally invasive prone lateral retropleural or retroperitoneal antepsoas approach spinal surgery using the rotatable radiolucent Jackson table.\",\"authors\":\"Yu-Cheng Yeh, Yung-Hsueh Hu, Ping-Yeh Chiu, Fu-Cheng Kao, Ming-Kai Hsieh, Chia-Wei Yu, Tsung-Ting Tsai, Po-Liang Lai, Tsai-Sheng Fu, Chi-Chien Niu, Lih-Huei Chen, Wen-Jer Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/jss-24-71\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prone lateral spinal surgery for simultaneous lateral and posterior approaches has recently been proposed to facilitate surgical room efficiency. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and outcomes of minimally invasive prone lateral spinal surgery using a rotatable radiolucent Jackson table.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From July 2021 to June 2023, a consecutive series of patients who received minimally invasive prone lateral spinal surgery for various etiologies by the same surgical team were reviewed. A Mizuho Jackson Modular Table System was used for all prone lateral surgeries. All patients received combined lateral and posterior approach surgery on the same day. The lateral approaches were performed with the Jackson table rotated 30-40 degrees away from the surgical side. A table-mounted oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) retractor was applied in retropleural/retroperitoneal spaces. Minimally invasive lateral procedures such as discectomy or mini-open corpectomy were performed after adequate exposure. Posterior procedures were performed with the Jackson table rotated back horizontally. The disease etiologies, surgical levels, blood loss, operation time, and surgical procedures were collected and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 64 patients with a mean age of 61.8 years (range, 26-88 years). The disease etiologies were 11 (17.2%) deformities, 15 (23.4%) degenerations, 25 (39.1%) infections, 9 (14.1%) traumas, and 4 (6.3%) tumors. The mean length of the surgical level was 4.1±2.0 (range, 2-10), with surgical levels ranging from T8 to L5 laterally and T6 to the ilium posteriorly. The mean blood loss was 863±843 mL (range, 50-4,600 mL) and the mean operation time was 314±148 minutes (range, 92-785 minutes). Of the lateral approaches, there were 25 retropleural and 39 retroperitoneal approaches (36 antepsoas approach). Surgical procedures performed included lateral discectomies, mini-open corpectomies, interbody reconstruction and fusion, and various posterior techniques such as pedicle screw instrumentation, cement augmentation, decompression, osteotomy, and spinal endoscopy. Patients who received both prone lateral retropleural and retroperitoneal approaches had significant improvement in the sagittal Cobb angle of the lateral surgical level, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at 1 year postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Minimally invasive prone lateral spinal surgery is a feasible option for patients requiring combined lateral and posterior approach spinal surgery. Both lateral retropleural and retroperitoneal antepsoas approaches can be applied in combination with various posterior surgical procedures in the prone position using the rotatable radiolucent Jackson table.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of spine surgery\",\"volume\":\"10 4\",\"pages\":\"663-679\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11732327/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of spine surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/jss-24-71\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of spine surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jss-24-71","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:俯卧侧位脊柱手术同时进行外侧和后路手术最近被提出以提高手术室效率。本研究的目的是评估使用可旋转透光Jackson手术台进行微创俯卧侧位脊柱手术的可行性和结果。方法:回顾性分析2021年7月至2023年6月同一外科团队因不同病因连续行微创俯卧侧位脊柱手术的患者。所有俯卧侧位手术均采用Mizuho Jackson模块化手术台系统。所有患者均于同日行外侧后路联合入路手术。侧入路手术时,Jackson手术台远离手术侧旋转30-40度。台式斜腰椎体间融合(OLIF)牵开器应用于胸膜后/腹膜后间隙。在充分暴露后进行微创侧位手术,如椎间盘切除术或小开口椎体切除术。后路手术时水平旋转Jackson桌。收集并分析疾病病因、手术水平、出血量、手术时间和手术方式。结果:研究纳入64例患者,平均年龄61.8岁(范围26-88岁)。其中畸形11例(17.2%),变性15例(23.4%),感染25例(39.1%),外伤9例(14.1%),肿瘤4例(6.3%)。手术水平的平均长度为4.1±2.0(范围,2-10),手术水平范围为外侧T8至L5,后方T6至髂骨。平均失血量863±843 mL(范围50 ~ 4600 mL),平均手术时间314±148 min(范围92 ~ 785 min)。在外侧入路中,胸膜后入路25例,腹膜后入路39例(羚羊入路36例)。手术包括外侧椎间盘切除术、小开口椎体切除术、椎体间重建和融合,以及各种后路技术,如椎弓根螺钉内固定、水泥增强、减压、截骨术和脊柱内窥镜检查。同时采用俯卧侧位胸膜后入路和腹膜后入路的患者术后1年矢状Cobb角、视觉模拟评分(VAS)和Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)均有显著改善。结论:微创俯卧侧位脊柱手术是需要侧后路联合入路脊柱手术的患者的可行选择。胸膜后外侧入路和腹膜后外侧入路均可与俯卧位的各种后路手术相结合,使用可旋转的透光Jackson手术台。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Minimally invasive prone lateral retropleural or retroperitoneal antepsoas approach spinal surgery using the rotatable radiolucent Jackson table.

Background: Prone lateral spinal surgery for simultaneous lateral and posterior approaches has recently been proposed to facilitate surgical room efficiency. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and outcomes of minimally invasive prone lateral spinal surgery using a rotatable radiolucent Jackson table.

Methods: From July 2021 to June 2023, a consecutive series of patients who received minimally invasive prone lateral spinal surgery for various etiologies by the same surgical team were reviewed. A Mizuho Jackson Modular Table System was used for all prone lateral surgeries. All patients received combined lateral and posterior approach surgery on the same day. The lateral approaches were performed with the Jackson table rotated 30-40 degrees away from the surgical side. A table-mounted oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) retractor was applied in retropleural/retroperitoneal spaces. Minimally invasive lateral procedures such as discectomy or mini-open corpectomy were performed after adequate exposure. Posterior procedures were performed with the Jackson table rotated back horizontally. The disease etiologies, surgical levels, blood loss, operation time, and surgical procedures were collected and analyzed.

Results: The study included 64 patients with a mean age of 61.8 years (range, 26-88 years). The disease etiologies were 11 (17.2%) deformities, 15 (23.4%) degenerations, 25 (39.1%) infections, 9 (14.1%) traumas, and 4 (6.3%) tumors. The mean length of the surgical level was 4.1±2.0 (range, 2-10), with surgical levels ranging from T8 to L5 laterally and T6 to the ilium posteriorly. The mean blood loss was 863±843 mL (range, 50-4,600 mL) and the mean operation time was 314±148 minutes (range, 92-785 minutes). Of the lateral approaches, there were 25 retropleural and 39 retroperitoneal approaches (36 antepsoas approach). Surgical procedures performed included lateral discectomies, mini-open corpectomies, interbody reconstruction and fusion, and various posterior techniques such as pedicle screw instrumentation, cement augmentation, decompression, osteotomy, and spinal endoscopy. Patients who received both prone lateral retropleural and retroperitoneal approaches had significant improvement in the sagittal Cobb angle of the lateral surgical level, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at 1 year postoperatively.

Conclusions: Minimally invasive prone lateral spinal surgery is a feasible option for patients requiring combined lateral and posterior approach spinal surgery. Both lateral retropleural and retroperitoneal antepsoas approaches can be applied in combination with various posterior surgical procedures in the prone position using the rotatable radiolucent Jackson table.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of spine surgery
Journal of spine surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信