Zihao Zhou, Cheng Deng, Maoyu Qin, Jie Yang, Takahiro Homma, Song Dong
{"title":"肺切除术后中度或重度漏气患者胸管刺激夹紧加速恢复。","authors":"Zihao Zhou, Cheng Deng, Maoyu Qin, Jie Yang, Takahiro Homma, Song Dong","doi":"10.21037/jtd-24-1871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative air leak is the most common complication after pulmonary resection. \"Provocative clamping\" was first described in 1992 in the context of guiding chest tube removal despite persistent air leak. However, early provocative clamping after pulmonary resection has not been evaluated. This study aimed to evaluate whether provocative clamping leads to severe complications following lung cancer surgery in patients with air leaks, particularly in the context of early chest tube removal.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective single-center study included patients who underwent pulmonary resection between September 2022 and October 2023. Air leak on postoperative day 1 or 2 was classified as grade 0-1 (low) or grade 2-4 (high). Low air leak allowed for immediate chest tube removal if there was no apparent pneumothorax or if pleural effusion was <200 mL. Meanwhile, high air leak necessitated chest tube clamping. Radiography was performed 24 hours after (with clamping) if there was no increase in subcutaneous emphysema or symptoms. The chest tube could then be removed if there was no increased pneumothorax.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 74 patients (53 had low leak, and 21 had high leak). The mean chest tube insertion durations were 2.2 days for low leak (range, 1-5 days) and 3.2 days for high leak (range, 2-7 days). The hospital lengths of stay were 3.7 days for low leak (range, 1-6 days) and 4.5 days for high leak (range, 3-8 days). One patient (1.3%) had a prolonged air leak (>5 days). No tension pneumothorax occurred during hospitalization or after discharge. One patient in the high leak group developed hydropneumothorax at 3 weeks after discharge, in whom the chest tube was reinserted.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Use of provocative clamping immediately after pulmonary resection appears to be safe for high-grade air leak patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":17542,"journal":{"name":"Journal of thoracic disease","volume":"16 12","pages":"8648-8655"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11740057/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chest tube provocative clamping in patients having moderate or intense air leaks after lung resection to accelerate recovery.\",\"authors\":\"Zihao Zhou, Cheng Deng, Maoyu Qin, Jie Yang, Takahiro Homma, Song Dong\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/jtd-24-1871\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative air leak is the most common complication after pulmonary resection. \\\"Provocative clamping\\\" was first described in 1992 in the context of guiding chest tube removal despite persistent air leak. However, early provocative clamping after pulmonary resection has not been evaluated. This study aimed to evaluate whether provocative clamping leads to severe complications following lung cancer surgery in patients with air leaks, particularly in the context of early chest tube removal.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective single-center study included patients who underwent pulmonary resection between September 2022 and October 2023. Air leak on postoperative day 1 or 2 was classified as grade 0-1 (low) or grade 2-4 (high). Low air leak allowed for immediate chest tube removal if there was no apparent pneumothorax or if pleural effusion was <200 mL. Meanwhile, high air leak necessitated chest tube clamping. Radiography was performed 24 hours after (with clamping) if there was no increase in subcutaneous emphysema or symptoms. The chest tube could then be removed if there was no increased pneumothorax.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 74 patients (53 had low leak, and 21 had high leak). The mean chest tube insertion durations were 2.2 days for low leak (range, 1-5 days) and 3.2 days for high leak (range, 2-7 days). The hospital lengths of stay were 3.7 days for low leak (range, 1-6 days) and 4.5 days for high leak (range, 3-8 days). One patient (1.3%) had a prolonged air leak (>5 days). No tension pneumothorax occurred during hospitalization or after discharge. One patient in the high leak group developed hydropneumothorax at 3 weeks after discharge, in whom the chest tube was reinserted.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Use of provocative clamping immediately after pulmonary resection appears to be safe for high-grade air leak patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of thoracic disease\",\"volume\":\"16 12\",\"pages\":\"8648-8655\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11740057/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of thoracic disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd-24-1871\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of thoracic disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd-24-1871","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
Chest tube provocative clamping in patients having moderate or intense air leaks after lung resection to accelerate recovery.
Background: Postoperative air leak is the most common complication after pulmonary resection. "Provocative clamping" was first described in 1992 in the context of guiding chest tube removal despite persistent air leak. However, early provocative clamping after pulmonary resection has not been evaluated. This study aimed to evaluate whether provocative clamping leads to severe complications following lung cancer surgery in patients with air leaks, particularly in the context of early chest tube removal.
Methods: This retrospective single-center study included patients who underwent pulmonary resection between September 2022 and October 2023. Air leak on postoperative day 1 or 2 was classified as grade 0-1 (low) or grade 2-4 (high). Low air leak allowed for immediate chest tube removal if there was no apparent pneumothorax or if pleural effusion was <200 mL. Meanwhile, high air leak necessitated chest tube clamping. Radiography was performed 24 hours after (with clamping) if there was no increase in subcutaneous emphysema or symptoms. The chest tube could then be removed if there was no increased pneumothorax.
Results: This study included 74 patients (53 had low leak, and 21 had high leak). The mean chest tube insertion durations were 2.2 days for low leak (range, 1-5 days) and 3.2 days for high leak (range, 2-7 days). The hospital lengths of stay were 3.7 days for low leak (range, 1-6 days) and 4.5 days for high leak (range, 3-8 days). One patient (1.3%) had a prolonged air leak (>5 days). No tension pneumothorax occurred during hospitalization or after discharge. One patient in the high leak group developed hydropneumothorax at 3 weeks after discharge, in whom the chest tube was reinserted.
Conclusions: Use of provocative clamping immediately after pulmonary resection appears to be safe for high-grade air leak patients.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Thoracic Disease (JTD, J Thorac Dis, pISSN: 2072-1439; eISSN: 2077-6624) was founded in Dec 2009, and indexed in PubMed in Dec 2011 and Science Citation Index SCI in Feb 2013. It is published quarterly (Dec 2009- Dec 2011), bimonthly (Jan 2012 - Dec 2013), monthly (Jan. 2014-) and openly distributed worldwide. JTD received its impact factor of 2.365 for the year 2016. JTD publishes manuscripts that describe new findings and provide current, practical information on the diagnosis and treatment of conditions related to thoracic disease. All the submission and reviewing are conducted electronically so that rapid review is assured.