腹疝修补术并发胰管切除术后的结果:一个大型数据库回顾。

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Amy Gin Gossett, Justin D Leavitt, W Borden Hooks, William W Hope
{"title":"腹疝修补术并发胰管切除术后的结果:一个大型数据库回顾。","authors":"Amy Gin Gossett, Justin D Leavitt, W Borden Hooks, William W Hope","doi":"10.1097/XCS.0000000000001287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with large pannus and ventral hernias may benefit from undergoing panniculectomy performed concurrently with open ventral hernia repair (VHR-PAN). However, there have been concerns related to increased surgical site occurrences (SSOs) when adding a panniculectomy. This study aimed to evaluate outcomes of open VHR with and without panniculectomy using a large hernia-specific database.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>The Abdominal Core Health Quality Collective database was queried from 2012 to 2023 for patients who underwent VHR-only vs VHR-PAN. Patient and surgical characteristics were described and compared. Short-term outcomes including surgical site infection, SSO, and SSO requiring procedural intervention were compared. Patient-reported outcomes and hernia recurrence were compared at 1 year. Logistic regression was used to identify risks associated with the above outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 28,140 patients underwent open VHR, with panniculectomy data (yes or no) available for 2,108 patients, including 870 who underwent VHR-PAN. Patients who underwent VHR-PAN were more likely to be female (78.3% vs 64.8%, p < 0.0001), have a BMI greater than 40 (21.0% vs 7.8%, p < 0.0001), and have a larger median hernia width (10.0 [7.0 to 15.0] vs 8.0 [3.0 to 13.0], p < 0.0001). In a matched analysis, there was no significant difference in surgical site infection, SSO, SSO requiring procedural intervention, or 1-year hernia recurrences rates in the VHR-PAN group (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrated that VHR with concurrent panniculectomy is not significantly associated with an increased risk of complications. Concurrent panniculectomy can be considered for selected patients needing VHR.</p>","PeriodicalId":17140,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Surgeons","volume":" ","pages":"530-535"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes after Ventral Hernia Repair with Concurrent Panniculectomy: A Large Database Review.\",\"authors\":\"Amy Gin Gossett, Justin D Leavitt, W Borden Hooks, William W Hope\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/XCS.0000000000001287\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with large pannus and ventral hernias may benefit from undergoing panniculectomy performed concurrently with open ventral hernia repair (VHR-PAN). However, there have been concerns related to increased surgical site occurrences (SSOs) when adding a panniculectomy. This study aimed to evaluate outcomes of open VHR with and without panniculectomy using a large hernia-specific database.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>The Abdominal Core Health Quality Collective database was queried from 2012 to 2023 for patients who underwent VHR-only vs VHR-PAN. Patient and surgical characteristics were described and compared. Short-term outcomes including surgical site infection, SSO, and SSO requiring procedural intervention were compared. Patient-reported outcomes and hernia recurrence were compared at 1 year. Logistic regression was used to identify risks associated with the above outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 28,140 patients underwent open VHR, with panniculectomy data (yes or no) available for 2,108 patients, including 870 who underwent VHR-PAN. Patients who underwent VHR-PAN were more likely to be female (78.3% vs 64.8%, p < 0.0001), have a BMI greater than 40 (21.0% vs 7.8%, p < 0.0001), and have a larger median hernia width (10.0 [7.0 to 15.0] vs 8.0 [3.0 to 13.0], p < 0.0001). In a matched analysis, there was no significant difference in surgical site infection, SSO, SSO requiring procedural intervention, or 1-year hernia recurrences rates in the VHR-PAN group (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrated that VHR with concurrent panniculectomy is not significantly associated with an increased risk of complications. Concurrent panniculectomy can be considered for selected patients needing VHR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17140,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American College of Surgeons\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"530-535\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American College of Surgeons\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/XCS.0000000000001287\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/XCS.0000000000001287","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:大腹膜疝和腹侧疝患者可能受益于胰管切除术同时进行开放式腹侧疝修补术(VHR-PAN)。然而,当增加胰管切除术时,有增加手术部位发生率的担忧。本研究旨在通过一个大的疝特异性数据库来评估开放VHR合并和不合并胰管切除术的结果。研究设计:从2012年至2023年,对腹部核心健康质量集体(ACHQC)数据库中接受VHR-only和VHR-PAN治疗的患者进行查询。对患者和手术特点进行描述和比较。短期结果包括手术部位感染(SSI)、手术部位发生(SSO)和SSO需要手术干预(SSOPI)进行比较。患者报告的预后(PROs)和疝复发在1年后进行比较。使用逻辑回归来确定与上述结果相关的风险。结果:28140例患者接受了开放式VHR, 2108例患者接受了胰管切除术(是或否),870例患者接受了VHR- pan。接受VHR-PAN的患者多为女性,78.3% vs 64.8% (p < 0.0001), BMI大于40,21.0% vs 7.8% (p < 0.0001),中位疝宽度较大,10.0 [7.0,15.0]vs 8.0 [3.0, 13.0] (p < 0.0001)。在一项匹配分析中,VHR- pan组在SSI、SSO、SSOPI或1年疝复发率方面没有显著差异(p结论:本研究表明,VHR合并胰管切除术与并发症风险增加没有显著相关。对于需要VHR的患者,可以考虑同时行胰管切除术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcomes after Ventral Hernia Repair with Concurrent Panniculectomy: A Large Database Review.

Background: Patients with large pannus and ventral hernias may benefit from undergoing panniculectomy performed concurrently with open ventral hernia repair (VHR-PAN). However, there have been concerns related to increased surgical site occurrences (SSOs) when adding a panniculectomy. This study aimed to evaluate outcomes of open VHR with and without panniculectomy using a large hernia-specific database.

Study design: The Abdominal Core Health Quality Collective database was queried from 2012 to 2023 for patients who underwent VHR-only vs VHR-PAN. Patient and surgical characteristics were described and compared. Short-term outcomes including surgical site infection, SSO, and SSO requiring procedural intervention were compared. Patient-reported outcomes and hernia recurrence were compared at 1 year. Logistic regression was used to identify risks associated with the above outcomes.

Results: A total of 28,140 patients underwent open VHR, with panniculectomy data (yes or no) available for 2,108 patients, including 870 who underwent VHR-PAN. Patients who underwent VHR-PAN were more likely to be female (78.3% vs 64.8%, p < 0.0001), have a BMI greater than 40 (21.0% vs 7.8%, p < 0.0001), and have a larger median hernia width (10.0 [7.0 to 15.0] vs 8.0 [3.0 to 13.0], p < 0.0001). In a matched analysis, there was no significant difference in surgical site infection, SSO, SSO requiring procedural intervention, or 1-year hernia recurrences rates in the VHR-PAN group (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: This study demonstrated that VHR with concurrent panniculectomy is not significantly associated with an increased risk of complications. Concurrent panniculectomy can be considered for selected patients needing VHR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
5.80%
发文量
1515
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American College of Surgeons (JACS) is a monthly journal publishing peer-reviewed original contributions on all aspects of surgery. These contributions include, but are not limited to, original clinical studies, review articles, and experimental investigations with clear clinical relevance. In general, case reports are not considered for publication. As the official scientific journal of the American College of Surgeons, JACS has the goal of providing its readership the highest quality rapid retrieval of information relevant to surgeons.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信