“先进的成像技术是否提高了2018年AO/OTA分型对股骨粗隆骨折的可靠性?”

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Prajwal Gupta, Sumit Arora, Shahrukh Khan, Swati Gupta, Vineet Bajaj, Abhishek Kashyap
{"title":"“先进的成像技术是否提高了2018年AO/OTA分型对股骨粗隆骨折的可靠性?”","authors":"Prajwal Gupta, Sumit Arora, Shahrukh Khan, Swati Gupta, Vineet Bajaj, Abhishek Kashyap","doi":"10.1016/j.jos.2024.12.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The influence of advanced imaging modalities on the reliability of 2018 AO/OTA classification and detection of features contributing to fracture instability have not been adequately studied in the literature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study was conducted to assess the reliability of 2018 AO/OTA classification for trochanteric femoral fractures, and features of instability in 50 patients using radiographs, multiplanar reformats (MPR), and 3D-reconstruction with fracture segmentation (3DR-FS) by 3 observers on 2 occasions at an interval of 4 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean inter-observer reliabilities on radiographs, MPR, 3DR-FS were 0.36, 0.39, 0.46 after first reading, and 0.35, 0.35, 0.44 after second reading respectively. The mean intra-observer reliabilities for radiographs, MPR, 3DR-FS were 0.36, 0.43, and 0.50 respectively. Inter-observer reliabilities on subgroup analysis were 0.35, 0.27, 0.40 for subgroup A1 and 0.19, 0.22, and 0.30 for subgroup A2 on radiographs, MPR and 3DR-FS respectively. All results were statistically significant (p-value <0.05). Posterior comminution was detected in 125(41 %), 247(82 %), and 255 (85 %) out of total 300 instances on radiographs, MPR and 3DR-FS respectively. Coronal split was detected in 113(37 %), 189(63 %), and 242 (80 %) out of total 300 instances on radiographs, MPR, and 3DR-FS respectively. Flexion of the proximal fragment was detected in 106(35 %), 163(54 %), and 180 (60 %) out of total 300 instances on radiographs, MPR, and 3DR-FS respectively. Lateral wall fracture was detected in 45(15 %), 80(26 %), and 138 (46 %) out of total 300 instances on radiographs, MPR, and 3DR-FS respectively. The banana fragment was detected in 5(1 %), 16(5 %), and 83 (27 %) out of a total of 300 instances on radiographs, MPR, and 3DR-FS respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>2018 AO/OTA classification for trochanteric femoral fractures has 'fair' reliabilities on radiographs and MPR that improve to 'moderate' on adding 3DR-FS. We attribute it mostly to the difficulty in localizing innominate tubercle. Adding advanced imaging helps better detect fracture instabilities.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level I, Diagnostic.</p>","PeriodicalId":16939,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"Does advanced imaging improve the reliability of 2018 AO/OTA classification for trochanteric femoral fractures?\\\"\",\"authors\":\"Prajwal Gupta, Sumit Arora, Shahrukh Khan, Swati Gupta, Vineet Bajaj, Abhishek Kashyap\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jos.2024.12.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The influence of advanced imaging modalities on the reliability of 2018 AO/OTA classification and detection of features contributing to fracture instability have not been adequately studied in the literature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study was conducted to assess the reliability of 2018 AO/OTA classification for trochanteric femoral fractures, and features of instability in 50 patients using radiographs, multiplanar reformats (MPR), and 3D-reconstruction with fracture segmentation (3DR-FS) by 3 observers on 2 occasions at an interval of 4 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean inter-observer reliabilities on radiographs, MPR, 3DR-FS were 0.36, 0.39, 0.46 after first reading, and 0.35, 0.35, 0.44 after second reading respectively. The mean intra-observer reliabilities for radiographs, MPR, 3DR-FS were 0.36, 0.43, and 0.50 respectively. Inter-observer reliabilities on subgroup analysis were 0.35, 0.27, 0.40 for subgroup A1 and 0.19, 0.22, and 0.30 for subgroup A2 on radiographs, MPR and 3DR-FS respectively. All results were statistically significant (p-value <0.05). Posterior comminution was detected in 125(41 %), 247(82 %), and 255 (85 %) out of total 300 instances on radiographs, MPR and 3DR-FS respectively. Coronal split was detected in 113(37 %), 189(63 %), and 242 (80 %) out of total 300 instances on radiographs, MPR, and 3DR-FS respectively. Flexion of the proximal fragment was detected in 106(35 %), 163(54 %), and 180 (60 %) out of total 300 instances on radiographs, MPR, and 3DR-FS respectively. Lateral wall fracture was detected in 45(15 %), 80(26 %), and 138 (46 %) out of total 300 instances on radiographs, MPR, and 3DR-FS respectively. The banana fragment was detected in 5(1 %), 16(5 %), and 83 (27 %) out of a total of 300 instances on radiographs, MPR, and 3DR-FS respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>2018 AO/OTA classification for trochanteric femoral fractures has 'fair' reliabilities on radiographs and MPR that improve to 'moderate' on adding 3DR-FS. We attribute it mostly to the difficulty in localizing innominate tubercle. Adding advanced imaging helps better detect fracture instabilities.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level I, Diagnostic.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16939,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2024.12.009\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2024.12.009","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:文献中尚未充分研究先进成像方式对2018 AO/OTA分类和检测导致骨折不稳定特征的可靠性的影响。方法:本前瞻性研究采用3名观察人员,每隔4周进行2次x线片、多平面重构(MPR)和骨折分割3d重建(3DR-FS),评估2018年AO/OTA分型对股骨粗隆骨折的可靠性和不稳定性特征。结果:x线片、MPR、3DR-FS的平均观察者间信度一读分别为0.36、0.39、0.46,二读分别为0.35、0.35、0.44。x线片、MPR、3DR-FS的平均观察者内信度分别为0.36、0.43和0.50。亚组分析中,A1亚组的x线片、MPR和3DR-FS的观察者间信度分别为0.35、0.27、0.40,A2亚组的观察者间信度分别为0.19、0.22、0.30。结论:2018年AO/OTA对股骨粗隆骨折的分级在x线片和MPR上具有“一般”的可靠性,添加3DR-FS后MPR提高到“中等”。我们将其主要归因于难以定位无名结节。先进的成像技术有助于更好地检测裂缝的不稳定性。证据等级:一级诊断性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
"Does advanced imaging improve the reliability of 2018 AO/OTA classification for trochanteric femoral fractures?"

Background: The influence of advanced imaging modalities on the reliability of 2018 AO/OTA classification and detection of features contributing to fracture instability have not been adequately studied in the literature.

Methods: This prospective study was conducted to assess the reliability of 2018 AO/OTA classification for trochanteric femoral fractures, and features of instability in 50 patients using radiographs, multiplanar reformats (MPR), and 3D-reconstruction with fracture segmentation (3DR-FS) by 3 observers on 2 occasions at an interval of 4 weeks.

Results: Mean inter-observer reliabilities on radiographs, MPR, 3DR-FS were 0.36, 0.39, 0.46 after first reading, and 0.35, 0.35, 0.44 after second reading respectively. The mean intra-observer reliabilities for radiographs, MPR, 3DR-FS were 0.36, 0.43, and 0.50 respectively. Inter-observer reliabilities on subgroup analysis were 0.35, 0.27, 0.40 for subgroup A1 and 0.19, 0.22, and 0.30 for subgroup A2 on radiographs, MPR and 3DR-FS respectively. All results were statistically significant (p-value <0.05). Posterior comminution was detected in 125(41 %), 247(82 %), and 255 (85 %) out of total 300 instances on radiographs, MPR and 3DR-FS respectively. Coronal split was detected in 113(37 %), 189(63 %), and 242 (80 %) out of total 300 instances on radiographs, MPR, and 3DR-FS respectively. Flexion of the proximal fragment was detected in 106(35 %), 163(54 %), and 180 (60 %) out of total 300 instances on radiographs, MPR, and 3DR-FS respectively. Lateral wall fracture was detected in 45(15 %), 80(26 %), and 138 (46 %) out of total 300 instances on radiographs, MPR, and 3DR-FS respectively. The banana fragment was detected in 5(1 %), 16(5 %), and 83 (27 %) out of a total of 300 instances on radiographs, MPR, and 3DR-FS respectively.

Conclusions: 2018 AO/OTA classification for trochanteric femoral fractures has 'fair' reliabilities on radiographs and MPR that improve to 'moderate' on adding 3DR-FS. We attribute it mostly to the difficulty in localizing innominate tubercle. Adding advanced imaging helps better detect fracture instabilities.

Level of evidence: Level I, Diagnostic.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Science
Journal of Orthopaedic Science 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
290
审稿时长
90 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedic Science is the official peer-reviewed journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association. The journal publishes the latest researches and topical debates in all fields of clinical and experimental orthopaedics, including musculoskeletal medicine, sports medicine, locomotive syndrome, trauma, paediatrics, oncology and biomaterials, as well as basic researches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信