水凝胶线圈在颅内动脉瘤治疗中的应用:一项多中心、前瞻性、随机开放标签试验。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Hirotoshi Imamura, Nobuyuki Sakai, Chiaki Sakai, Akio Hyodo, Yasushi Ito, Yuji Matsumaru, Shigeru Miyachi, Shinichi Yoshimura, Makoto Sasaki, Toshinori Hirai, Hiroyuki Kinouchi, Susumu Miyamoto, Yasushi Okada, Masaki Komiyama, Kuniaki Ogasawara, Kazunori Toyoda, Takashi Daimon, Masayuki Ezura, Ichiro Nakahara, Akira Ishii, Yasushi Matsumoto, Kenichiro Tanabe
{"title":"水凝胶线圈在颅内动脉瘤治疗中的应用:一项多中心、前瞻性、随机开放标签试验。","authors":"Hirotoshi Imamura, Nobuyuki Sakai, Chiaki Sakai, Akio Hyodo, Yasushi Ito, Yuji Matsumaru, Shigeru Miyachi, Shinichi Yoshimura, Makoto Sasaki, Toshinori Hirai, Hiroyuki Kinouchi, Susumu Miyamoto, Yasushi Okada, Masaki Komiyama, Kuniaki Ogasawara, Kazunori Toyoda, Takashi Daimon, Masayuki Ezura, Ichiro Nakahara, Akira Ishii, Yasushi Matsumoto, Kenichiro Tanabe","doi":"10.3171/2024.8.JNS232369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of hydrogel-coated coils (HGCs) to achieve the composite endpoint of decreased recanalization rates and greater safety. Herein, the authors aimed to assess the true ability of second-generation HGCs to prevent recanalization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized controlled study, the HYBRID (Hydrocoil Versus Bare Platinum Coil in Recanalization Imaging Data) trial, comparing HGCs with bare platinum coils (BPCs), was conducted in 43 Japanese institutions. The aneurysm diameter range was 7-20 mm. HGCs were used in 4 patients in the BPC arm, and at least one HGC was used in each patient in the HGC arm, excluding 3 patients. Additionally, an HGC length ≥ 50% of the length of all the coils used was strongly recommended. The primary endpoint was recanalization 1 year after embolization, according to core laboratory evaluation. Angiographic change was also classified as further thrombosis, unchanged, or recanalization. Changes in cases with both initial and 1-year posttreatment angiographic images were compared. In the post hoc analysis, major recanalization was defined as any change, from complete occlusion or a neck remnant at the end of the procedure to body filling (BF) on the 1-year posttreatment angiogram or any increase in the size of BF in patients with BF at the end of the procedure, and its rate was compared between the two treatment arms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Recruitment ended when 432 patients were randomized; 217 and 215 patients were allocated to the HGC and BPC arms, respectively. The recanalization rates in the HGC and BPC arms were 3.3% and 7.1%, respectively (risk difference -3.8%, 95% CI -8.6 to 0.5), with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.083). Regarding aneurysm occlusion within 1 year, there was significantly more thrombosis and less recanalization in the HGC group (p = 0.043). The major recanalization rates were 2.3% and 6.6% in the HGC and BPC arms, respectively, with a significant difference between the two (p = 0.036).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study results did not confirm the effectiveness of second-generation HGCs using recanalization imaging data. However, these coils may induce more thrombosis and less recanalization for medium-sized cerebral aneurysms. Clinical trial registration no.: UMIN000006748 (www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/).</p>","PeriodicalId":16505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hydrogel coils in intracranial aneurysm treatment: a multicenter, prospective, randomized open-label trial.\",\"authors\":\"Hirotoshi Imamura, Nobuyuki Sakai, Chiaki Sakai, Akio Hyodo, Yasushi Ito, Yuji Matsumaru, Shigeru Miyachi, Shinichi Yoshimura, Makoto Sasaki, Toshinori Hirai, Hiroyuki Kinouchi, Susumu Miyamoto, Yasushi Okada, Masaki Komiyama, Kuniaki Ogasawara, Kazunori Toyoda, Takashi Daimon, Masayuki Ezura, Ichiro Nakahara, Akira Ishii, Yasushi Matsumoto, Kenichiro Tanabe\",\"doi\":\"10.3171/2024.8.JNS232369\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of hydrogel-coated coils (HGCs) to achieve the composite endpoint of decreased recanalization rates and greater safety. Herein, the authors aimed to assess the true ability of second-generation HGCs to prevent recanalization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized controlled study, the HYBRID (Hydrocoil Versus Bare Platinum Coil in Recanalization Imaging Data) trial, comparing HGCs with bare platinum coils (BPCs), was conducted in 43 Japanese institutions. The aneurysm diameter range was 7-20 mm. HGCs were used in 4 patients in the BPC arm, and at least one HGC was used in each patient in the HGC arm, excluding 3 patients. Additionally, an HGC length ≥ 50% of the length of all the coils used was strongly recommended. The primary endpoint was recanalization 1 year after embolization, according to core laboratory evaluation. Angiographic change was also classified as further thrombosis, unchanged, or recanalization. Changes in cases with both initial and 1-year posttreatment angiographic images were compared. In the post hoc analysis, major recanalization was defined as any change, from complete occlusion or a neck remnant at the end of the procedure to body filling (BF) on the 1-year posttreatment angiogram or any increase in the size of BF in patients with BF at the end of the procedure, and its rate was compared between the two treatment arms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Recruitment ended when 432 patients were randomized; 217 and 215 patients were allocated to the HGC and BPC arms, respectively. The recanalization rates in the HGC and BPC arms were 3.3% and 7.1%, respectively (risk difference -3.8%, 95% CI -8.6 to 0.5), with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.083). Regarding aneurysm occlusion within 1 year, there was significantly more thrombosis and less recanalization in the HGC group (p = 0.043). The major recanalization rates were 2.3% and 6.6% in the HGC and BPC arms, respectively, with a significant difference between the two (p = 0.036).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study results did not confirm the effectiveness of second-generation HGCs using recanalization imaging data. However, these coils may induce more thrombosis and less recanalization for medium-sized cerebral aneurysms. Clinical trial registration no.: UMIN000006748 (www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.8.JNS232369\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.8.JNS232369","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:研究证明了水凝胶涂层线圈(HGCs)在降低再通率和提高安全性方面的有效性。在此,作者旨在评估第二代hgc防止再通的真正能力。方法:这项随机对照研究,即HYBRID (Hydrocoil vs Bare Platinum Coil in reanalization Imaging Data)试验,在43家日本机构进行了hgc与裸铂线圈(BPCs)的比较。动脉瘤直径范围7 ~ 20mm。BPC组有4例患者使用了HGC, HGC组中除3例患者外,每位患者至少使用了1例HGC。此外,强烈建议HGC长度≥所使用线圈长度的50%。根据核心实验室评估,主要终点是栓塞后1年的再通。血管造影改变也可分为进一步血栓形成、未改变或再通。比较治疗初期和治疗后1年血管造影图像的变化。在事后分析中,主要再通被定义为任何变化,从手术结束时完全闭塞或颈部残留到治疗后1年血管造影上的体充盈(BF),或BF患者在手术结束时BF大小的任何增加,并在两个治疗组之间比较其发生率。结果:招募结束时,432名患者被随机化;分别有217名和215名患者被分配到HGC组和BPC组。HGC组和BPC组再通率分别为3.3%和7.1%(风险差-3.8%,95% CI -8.6 ~ 0.5),差异无统计学意义(p = 0.083)。在动脉瘤闭塞1年内,HGC组血栓形成明显增多,再通率明显降低(p = 0.043)。HGC组和BPC组的主要再通率分别为2.3%和6.6%,两者差异有统计学意义(p = 0.036)。结论:研究结果并没有证实第二代hgc使用再通成像数据的有效性。然而,对于中等大小的脑动脉瘤,这些线圈可能会导致更多的血栓形成和更少的再通。临床试验注册号:: UMIN000006748 (www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hydrogel coils in intracranial aneurysm treatment: a multicenter, prospective, randomized open-label trial.

Objective: Studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of hydrogel-coated coils (HGCs) to achieve the composite endpoint of decreased recanalization rates and greater safety. Herein, the authors aimed to assess the true ability of second-generation HGCs to prevent recanalization.

Methods: This randomized controlled study, the HYBRID (Hydrocoil Versus Bare Platinum Coil in Recanalization Imaging Data) trial, comparing HGCs with bare platinum coils (BPCs), was conducted in 43 Japanese institutions. The aneurysm diameter range was 7-20 mm. HGCs were used in 4 patients in the BPC arm, and at least one HGC was used in each patient in the HGC arm, excluding 3 patients. Additionally, an HGC length ≥ 50% of the length of all the coils used was strongly recommended. The primary endpoint was recanalization 1 year after embolization, according to core laboratory evaluation. Angiographic change was also classified as further thrombosis, unchanged, or recanalization. Changes in cases with both initial and 1-year posttreatment angiographic images were compared. In the post hoc analysis, major recanalization was defined as any change, from complete occlusion or a neck remnant at the end of the procedure to body filling (BF) on the 1-year posttreatment angiogram or any increase in the size of BF in patients with BF at the end of the procedure, and its rate was compared between the two treatment arms.

Results: Recruitment ended when 432 patients were randomized; 217 and 215 patients were allocated to the HGC and BPC arms, respectively. The recanalization rates in the HGC and BPC arms were 3.3% and 7.1%, respectively (risk difference -3.8%, 95% CI -8.6 to 0.5), with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.083). Regarding aneurysm occlusion within 1 year, there was significantly more thrombosis and less recanalization in the HGC group (p = 0.043). The major recanalization rates were 2.3% and 6.6% in the HGC and BPC arms, respectively, with a significant difference between the two (p = 0.036).

Conclusions: The study results did not confirm the effectiveness of second-generation HGCs using recanalization imaging data. However, these coils may induce more thrombosis and less recanalization for medium-sized cerebral aneurysms. Clinical trial registration no.: UMIN000006748 (www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery
Journal of neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1003
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, and Neurosurgical Focus are devoted to the publication of original works relating primarily to neurosurgery, including studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology. The Editors and Editorial Boards encourage submission of clinical and laboratory studies. Other manuscripts accepted for review include technical notes on instruments or equipment that are innovative or useful to clinicians and researchers in the field of neuroscience; papers describing unusual cases; manuscripts on historical persons or events related to neurosurgery; and in Neurosurgical Focus, occasional reviews. Letters to the Editor commenting on articles recently published in the Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, and Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信