Saeyun Lee, Sujin Kim, Suzanne Segerstrom, Polly J Ferguson, Aleksander Lenert
{"title":"诊断自身炎症综合征的行政代码的准确性和性能特征:一项发现和验证研究。","authors":"Saeyun Lee, Sujin Kim, Suzanne Segerstrom, Polly J Ferguson, Aleksander Lenert","doi":"10.1097/RHU.0000000000002172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate and validate the accuracy and performance characteristics of administrative codes in diagnosing autoinflammatory syndromes (AISs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified potential AIS patients from the electronic medical records at the University of Iowa Hospital and Clinics and the Stead Family Children's Hospital using a screening filter based on the 10th edition of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) codes and interleukin-1 antagonists. Diagnostic criteria for adult-onset Still disease, systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis, Behçet disease (BD), familial Mediterranean fever (FMF), cryopyrin-associated periodic syndrome (CAPS), and SAPHO (synovitis, acne, pustulosis, hyperostosis, and osteitis) syndrome and chronic nonbacterial osteomyelitis (SAPHO-CNO) were reviewed for each patient. Patients who did not meet the diagnostic criteria were categorized as non-AIS. In this cross-sectional study, we calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the ICD codes in diagnosing AIS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the 502 patients with potential AIS, 338 patients (67%) had a true AIS diagnosis. Sensitivity ranged from 80% (SAPHO-CNO) to 100% (BD and FMF), and positive predictive value ranged from 15% (FMF) to 80% (SAPHO-CNO). Specificity ranged from 81% (FMF) to 99% (CAPS and SAPHO-CNO), whereas negative predictive value ranged from 98% (adult-onset Still disease) to 100% (systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis, BD, FMF, and CAPS). All ICD codes or code combinations for the diagnosis of specific AIS subtypes showed high accuracy with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve ≥0.89.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study validated the accuracy of administrative codes for diagnosing AIS, supporting their use in constructing AIS cohorts for clinical outcomes research.</p>","PeriodicalId":14745,"journal":{"name":"JCR: Journal of Clinical Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy and Performance Characteristics of Administrative Codes for the Diagnosis of Autoinflammatory Syndromes: A Discovery and Validation Study.\",\"authors\":\"Saeyun Lee, Sujin Kim, Suzanne Segerstrom, Polly J Ferguson, Aleksander Lenert\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/RHU.0000000000002172\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate and validate the accuracy and performance characteristics of administrative codes in diagnosing autoinflammatory syndromes (AISs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified potential AIS patients from the electronic medical records at the University of Iowa Hospital and Clinics and the Stead Family Children's Hospital using a screening filter based on the 10th edition of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) codes and interleukin-1 antagonists. Diagnostic criteria for adult-onset Still disease, systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis, Behçet disease (BD), familial Mediterranean fever (FMF), cryopyrin-associated periodic syndrome (CAPS), and SAPHO (synovitis, acne, pustulosis, hyperostosis, and osteitis) syndrome and chronic nonbacterial osteomyelitis (SAPHO-CNO) were reviewed for each patient. Patients who did not meet the diagnostic criteria were categorized as non-AIS. In this cross-sectional study, we calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the ICD codes in diagnosing AIS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the 502 patients with potential AIS, 338 patients (67%) had a true AIS diagnosis. Sensitivity ranged from 80% (SAPHO-CNO) to 100% (BD and FMF), and positive predictive value ranged from 15% (FMF) to 80% (SAPHO-CNO). Specificity ranged from 81% (FMF) to 99% (CAPS and SAPHO-CNO), whereas negative predictive value ranged from 98% (adult-onset Still disease) to 100% (systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis, BD, FMF, and CAPS). All ICD codes or code combinations for the diagnosis of specific AIS subtypes showed high accuracy with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve ≥0.89.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study validated the accuracy of administrative codes for diagnosing AIS, supporting their use in constructing AIS cohorts for clinical outcomes research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14745,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JCR: Journal of Clinical Rheumatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JCR: Journal of Clinical Rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/RHU.0000000000002172\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCR: Journal of Clinical Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RHU.0000000000002172","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Accuracy and Performance Characteristics of Administrative Codes for the Diagnosis of Autoinflammatory Syndromes: A Discovery and Validation Study.
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate and validate the accuracy and performance characteristics of administrative codes in diagnosing autoinflammatory syndromes (AISs).
Methods: We identified potential AIS patients from the electronic medical records at the University of Iowa Hospital and Clinics and the Stead Family Children's Hospital using a screening filter based on the 10th edition of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) codes and interleukin-1 antagonists. Diagnostic criteria for adult-onset Still disease, systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis, Behçet disease (BD), familial Mediterranean fever (FMF), cryopyrin-associated periodic syndrome (CAPS), and SAPHO (synovitis, acne, pustulosis, hyperostosis, and osteitis) syndrome and chronic nonbacterial osteomyelitis (SAPHO-CNO) were reviewed for each patient. Patients who did not meet the diagnostic criteria were categorized as non-AIS. In this cross-sectional study, we calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the ICD codes in diagnosing AIS.
Results: Out of the 502 patients with potential AIS, 338 patients (67%) had a true AIS diagnosis. Sensitivity ranged from 80% (SAPHO-CNO) to 100% (BD and FMF), and positive predictive value ranged from 15% (FMF) to 80% (SAPHO-CNO). Specificity ranged from 81% (FMF) to 99% (CAPS and SAPHO-CNO), whereas negative predictive value ranged from 98% (adult-onset Still disease) to 100% (systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis, BD, FMF, and CAPS). All ICD codes or code combinations for the diagnosis of specific AIS subtypes showed high accuracy with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve ≥0.89.
Conclusions: This study validated the accuracy of administrative codes for diagnosing AIS, supporting their use in constructing AIS cohorts for clinical outcomes research.
期刊介绍:
JCR: Journal of Clinical Rheumatology the peer-reviewed, bimonthly journal that rheumatologists asked for. Each issue contains practical information on patient care in a clinically oriented, easy-to-read format. Our commitment is to timely, relevant coverage of the topics and issues shaping current practice. We pack each issue with original articles, case reports, reviews, brief reports, expert commentary, letters to the editor, and more. This is where you''ll find the answers to tough patient management issues as well as the latest information about technological advances affecting your practice.