Ajeet Kumar Gandhi, Supriya Chopra, Madhup Rastogi, Indranil Mallick, Misael C Cruz, Koichi Yasuda, Ying Ying Sum, Yasushi Nagata, Hong-Gyun Wu, Gregorius B Prajogi, Henry Kodrat, Mingwei Ma, Asif Nisar, Imjai Chitapanarux
{"title":"多中心横断面调查以评估亚洲地区头颈癌管理中使用的分级策略的差异(INNOCENCE-ASIA)。","authors":"Ajeet Kumar Gandhi, Supriya Chopra, Madhup Rastogi, Indranil Mallick, Misael C Cruz, Koichi Yasuda, Ying Ying Sum, Yasushi Nagata, Hong-Gyun Wu, Gregorius B Prajogi, Henry Kodrat, Mingwei Ma, Asif Nisar, Imjai Chitapanarux","doi":"10.1200/GO-24-00349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Head and neck cancers (HNCs) are in general treated with conventional fractionation regimen of 1.8-2 Gy per fraction. Altered fractionation (ALFT) strategies such as hypofractionation radiotherapy (HYPO-RT), accelerated fractionation radiotherapy (AFRT), and hyperfractionation radiotherapy (HFRT) have not been practiced uniformly across centers in different parts of the world. Countries in Asia share common cancer demographics, and we designed this survey for Federation of Asian Radiation Oncology (FARO) member countries to understand the usage and challenges in the delivery of ALFT in HNCs.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A 21-point electronic survey (Federation of Asian Radiation Oncology Research Network [FERN]-S-005) was designed by the FERN and was circulated through the FARO research secretariat to the FARO council member countries and the responses were collected between August and November 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve of 14 member countries (85.7%) responded to the survey. Twenty-seven responses were received and 78% of the respondents belonged to government/teaching academic institute. 4/27 (14.8%) reported never using HYPO-RT for any of the clinical subsite of HNCs, while the majority (85.2%) used it for glottic cancers and 22% also used it for postoperative setting. Majority (77.7%) used a fractionation schedule with dose per fraction ranging between 2.2 and 2.5 Gy. 6/27 (22.2%) used AFRT for definitive setting and five of these also used concurrent chemoradiotherapy. 4/27 (14.8%) centers reported using HFRT. The most common reason (62.9%) for the limited usage of AFRT/HFRT was reported to be logistical, such as unavailability of machine slots, patient load, and so on.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The result of the survey suggests that among the ALFT strategies for HNCs, HYPO-RT schedules have common interest and feasibility among the FARO member countries and also highlights the challenges in the delivery of AFRT/HFRT in the Asian region.</p>","PeriodicalId":14806,"journal":{"name":"JCO Global Oncology","volume":"11 ","pages":"e2400349"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multicentric Cross-Sectional Survey to Assess the Variation of Fractionation Strategies Used in the Management of Head and Neck Cancers in the Asian Region (INNOCENCE-ASIA).\",\"authors\":\"Ajeet Kumar Gandhi, Supriya Chopra, Madhup Rastogi, Indranil Mallick, Misael C Cruz, Koichi Yasuda, Ying Ying Sum, Yasushi Nagata, Hong-Gyun Wu, Gregorius B Prajogi, Henry Kodrat, Mingwei Ma, Asif Nisar, Imjai Chitapanarux\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/GO-24-00349\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Head and neck cancers (HNCs) are in general treated with conventional fractionation regimen of 1.8-2 Gy per fraction. Altered fractionation (ALFT) strategies such as hypofractionation radiotherapy (HYPO-RT), accelerated fractionation radiotherapy (AFRT), and hyperfractionation radiotherapy (HFRT) have not been practiced uniformly across centers in different parts of the world. Countries in Asia share common cancer demographics, and we designed this survey for Federation of Asian Radiation Oncology (FARO) member countries to understand the usage and challenges in the delivery of ALFT in HNCs.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A 21-point electronic survey (Federation of Asian Radiation Oncology Research Network [FERN]-S-005) was designed by the FERN and was circulated through the FARO research secretariat to the FARO council member countries and the responses were collected between August and November 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve of 14 member countries (85.7%) responded to the survey. Twenty-seven responses were received and 78% of the respondents belonged to government/teaching academic institute. 4/27 (14.8%) reported never using HYPO-RT for any of the clinical subsite of HNCs, while the majority (85.2%) used it for glottic cancers and 22% also used it for postoperative setting. Majority (77.7%) used a fractionation schedule with dose per fraction ranging between 2.2 and 2.5 Gy. 6/27 (22.2%) used AFRT for definitive setting and five of these also used concurrent chemoradiotherapy. 4/27 (14.8%) centers reported using HFRT. The most common reason (62.9%) for the limited usage of AFRT/HFRT was reported to be logistical, such as unavailability of machine slots, patient load, and so on.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The result of the survey suggests that among the ALFT strategies for HNCs, HYPO-RT schedules have common interest and feasibility among the FARO member countries and also highlights the challenges in the delivery of AFRT/HFRT in the Asian region.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JCO Global Oncology\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"e2400349\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JCO Global Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/GO-24-00349\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO Global Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/GO-24-00349","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:头颈癌(HNCs)一般采用1.8-2 Gy /分次的常规分次治疗方案。诸如低分割放疗(hyport)、加速分割放疗(AFRT)和高分割放疗(HFRT)等改变分割(ALFT)策略尚未在世界不同地区的中心统一实施。亚洲国家有共同的癌症人口统计数据,我们为亚洲放射肿瘤学联合会(FARO)成员国设计了这项调查,以了解在HNCs中ALFT的使用和面临的挑战。材料和方法:由亚洲放射肿瘤学研究网络联合会(Federation of Asian Radiation Oncology Research Network, FERN)设计的21点电子调查(Federation of Asian Radiation Oncology Research Network [FERN]-S-005)通过FARO研究秘书处分发给FARO理事会成员国,调查结果于2023年8月至11月收集。结果:14个成员国中有12个(85.7%)回应了调查。共收到27份回应,其中78%的受访者来自政府/教学学术机构。4/27(14.8%)的患者报告从未对任何临床亚型的HNCs使用过低放射治疗,而大多数(85.2%)的患者将其用于声门癌,22%的患者也将其用于术后治疗。大多数患者(77.7%)使用分步治疗方案,每分步剂量范围在2.2至2.5 Gy之间。6/27(22.2%)患者使用AFRT作为最终治疗方案,其中5人同时使用放化疗。4/27(14.8%)中心报告使用HFRT。据报道,AFRT/HFRT使用受限的最常见原因(62.9%)是后勤问题,如机器插槽不可用、患者负荷等。结论:调查结果表明,在针对高收入国家的ALFT战略中,hypoo - rt计划具有FARO成员国的共同利益和可行性,同时也突出了亚洲地区在提供AFRT/HFRT方面面临的挑战。
Multicentric Cross-Sectional Survey to Assess the Variation of Fractionation Strategies Used in the Management of Head and Neck Cancers in the Asian Region (INNOCENCE-ASIA).
Purpose: Head and neck cancers (HNCs) are in general treated with conventional fractionation regimen of 1.8-2 Gy per fraction. Altered fractionation (ALFT) strategies such as hypofractionation radiotherapy (HYPO-RT), accelerated fractionation radiotherapy (AFRT), and hyperfractionation radiotherapy (HFRT) have not been practiced uniformly across centers in different parts of the world. Countries in Asia share common cancer demographics, and we designed this survey for Federation of Asian Radiation Oncology (FARO) member countries to understand the usage and challenges in the delivery of ALFT in HNCs.
Materials and methods: A 21-point electronic survey (Federation of Asian Radiation Oncology Research Network [FERN]-S-005) was designed by the FERN and was circulated through the FARO research secretariat to the FARO council member countries and the responses were collected between August and November 2023.
Results: Twelve of 14 member countries (85.7%) responded to the survey. Twenty-seven responses were received and 78% of the respondents belonged to government/teaching academic institute. 4/27 (14.8%) reported never using HYPO-RT for any of the clinical subsite of HNCs, while the majority (85.2%) used it for glottic cancers and 22% also used it for postoperative setting. Majority (77.7%) used a fractionation schedule with dose per fraction ranging between 2.2 and 2.5 Gy. 6/27 (22.2%) used AFRT for definitive setting and five of these also used concurrent chemoradiotherapy. 4/27 (14.8%) centers reported using HFRT. The most common reason (62.9%) for the limited usage of AFRT/HFRT was reported to be logistical, such as unavailability of machine slots, patient load, and so on.
Conclusion: The result of the survey suggests that among the ALFT strategies for HNCs, HYPO-RT schedules have common interest and feasibility among the FARO member countries and also highlights the challenges in the delivery of AFRT/HFRT in the Asian region.