血管内取栓前静脉溶栓对血压降低的影响。

IF 6.3 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Jaeseob Yun, Kwang Hyun Kim, Jae Wook Jung, Young Dae Kim, JoonNyung Heo, Hyungwoo Lee, Jin Kyo Choi, In Hwan Lim, Soon-Ho Hong, Byung Moon Kim, Dong Joon Kim, Na Young Shin, Bang-Hoon Cho, Seong Hwan Ahn, Hyungjong Park, Sung-Il Sohn, Jeong-Ho Hong, Tae-Jin Song, Yoonkyung Chang, Gyu Sik Kim, Kwon-Duk Seo, Kijeong Lee, Jun Young Chang, Jung Hwa Seo, Sukyoon Lee, Jang-Hyun Baek, Han-Jin Cho, Dong Hoon Shin, Jinkwon Kim, Joonsang Yoo, Minyoul Baik, Kyung-Yul Lee, Yo Han Jung, Yang-Ha Hwang, Chi Kyung Kim, Jae Guk Kim, Chan Joo Lee, Sungha Park, Soyoung Jeon, Hye Sun Lee, Sun U Kwon, Il Hyung Lee, Oh Young Bang, Ji Hoe Heo, Hyo Suk Nam
{"title":"血管内取栓前静脉溶栓对血压降低的影响。","authors":"Jaeseob Yun, Kwang Hyun Kim, Jae Wook Jung, Young Dae Kim, JoonNyung Heo, Hyungwoo Lee, Jin Kyo Choi, In Hwan Lim, Soon-Ho Hong, Byung Moon Kim, Dong Joon Kim, Na Young Shin, Bang-Hoon Cho, Seong Hwan Ahn, Hyungjong Park, Sung-Il Sohn, Jeong-Ho Hong, Tae-Jin Song, Yoonkyung Chang, Gyu Sik Kim, Kwon-Duk Seo, Kijeong Lee, Jun Young Chang, Jung Hwa Seo, Sukyoon Lee, Jang-Hyun Baek, Han-Jin Cho, Dong Hoon Shin, Jinkwon Kim, Joonsang Yoo, Minyoul Baik, Kyung-Yul Lee, Yo Han Jung, Yang-Ha Hwang, Chi Kyung Kim, Jae Guk Kim, Chan Joo Lee, Sungha Park, Soyoung Jeon, Hye Sun Lee, Sun U Kwon, Il Hyung Lee, Oh Young Bang, Ji Hoe Heo, Hyo Suk Nam","doi":"10.1177/17474930251315630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The effects of blood pressure (BP) lowering in patients treated with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV tPA) before endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) are unclear.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aims to investigate whether intensive and conventional BP management affects outcomes differently, depending on IV tPA administration before EVT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this subgroup analysis of the Outcome in Patients Treated with Intra-Arterial Thrombectomy-Optimal Blood Pressure Control (OPTIMAL-BP; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04205305) trial, patients were divided into groups based on IV tPA use before EVT. Clinical outcomes of intensive (systolic BP target < 140 mm Hg) or conventional BP management (systolic BP target 140-180 mm Hg) were compared among groups. The primary efficacy outcome was a favorable outcome at 3 months (modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2). Primary safety outcomes included symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) within 36 h and stroke-related death within 3 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 302 patients, the IV tPA group included 98 (32.5%) and the non-IV tPA group comprised 204 subjects (67.5%). In the IV tPA group, intensive BP management significantly lowered the favorable outcome rate (intensive, 27.3% vs. conventional, 51.9%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.13-0.93; <i>p</i> = 0.04). In the non-IV tPA group, the risk difference rate of favorable outcome was not significantly different between intensive and conventional BP management (44.1% vs. 55.9%; aOR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.31-1.22; <i>p</i> = 0.17). Notably, the proportion of malignant cerebral edema within 36 h in the IV tPA group was significantly higher in the intensive management group (18.2%) than in the conventional management group (1.9%; aOR, 10.72; 95% CI, 1.24-92.29; <i>p</i> = 0.03). sICH and mortality rates were not significantly different between intensive and conventional BP management in either study groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Intensive BP management worsens 3-month functional outcomes after successful EVT without reducing sICH among patients who received IV tPA before EVT, indicating that BP lowering in this population should be cautious.</p>","PeriodicalId":14442,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Stroke","volume":" ","pages":"17474930251315630"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of blood pressure lowering in patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis before endovascular thrombectomy.\",\"authors\":\"Jaeseob Yun, Kwang Hyun Kim, Jae Wook Jung, Young Dae Kim, JoonNyung Heo, Hyungwoo Lee, Jin Kyo Choi, In Hwan Lim, Soon-Ho Hong, Byung Moon Kim, Dong Joon Kim, Na Young Shin, Bang-Hoon Cho, Seong Hwan Ahn, Hyungjong Park, Sung-Il Sohn, Jeong-Ho Hong, Tae-Jin Song, Yoonkyung Chang, Gyu Sik Kim, Kwon-Duk Seo, Kijeong Lee, Jun Young Chang, Jung Hwa Seo, Sukyoon Lee, Jang-Hyun Baek, Han-Jin Cho, Dong Hoon Shin, Jinkwon Kim, Joonsang Yoo, Minyoul Baik, Kyung-Yul Lee, Yo Han Jung, Yang-Ha Hwang, Chi Kyung Kim, Jae Guk Kim, Chan Joo Lee, Sungha Park, Soyoung Jeon, Hye Sun Lee, Sun U Kwon, Il Hyung Lee, Oh Young Bang, Ji Hoe Heo, Hyo Suk Nam\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17474930251315630\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The effects of blood pressure (BP) lowering in patients treated with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV tPA) before endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) are unclear.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aims to investigate whether intensive and conventional BP management affects outcomes differently, depending on IV tPA administration before EVT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this subgroup analysis of the Outcome in Patients Treated with Intra-Arterial Thrombectomy-Optimal Blood Pressure Control (OPTIMAL-BP; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04205305) trial, patients were divided into groups based on IV tPA use before EVT. Clinical outcomes of intensive (systolic BP target < 140 mm Hg) or conventional BP management (systolic BP target 140-180 mm Hg) were compared among groups. The primary efficacy outcome was a favorable outcome at 3 months (modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2). Primary safety outcomes included symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) within 36 h and stroke-related death within 3 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 302 patients, the IV tPA group included 98 (32.5%) and the non-IV tPA group comprised 204 subjects (67.5%). In the IV tPA group, intensive BP management significantly lowered the favorable outcome rate (intensive, 27.3% vs. conventional, 51.9%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.13-0.93; <i>p</i> = 0.04). In the non-IV tPA group, the risk difference rate of favorable outcome was not significantly different between intensive and conventional BP management (44.1% vs. 55.9%; aOR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.31-1.22; <i>p</i> = 0.17). Notably, the proportion of malignant cerebral edema within 36 h in the IV tPA group was significantly higher in the intensive management group (18.2%) than in the conventional management group (1.9%; aOR, 10.72; 95% CI, 1.24-92.29; <i>p</i> = 0.03). sICH and mortality rates were not significantly different between intensive and conventional BP management in either study groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Intensive BP management worsens 3-month functional outcomes after successful EVT without reducing sICH among patients who received IV tPA before EVT, indicating that BP lowering in this population should be cautious.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14442,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Stroke\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"17474930251315630\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Stroke\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17474930251315630\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Stroke","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17474930251315630","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:血管内取栓(EVT)前静脉注射组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(IV tPA)对患者血压(BP)降低的影响尚不清楚。目的:本研究旨在探讨在EVT前静脉注射tPA是否对强化和常规血压管理的结果有不同的影响。方法:在这个亚组中分析动脉内血栓切除术患者的预后-最佳血压控制(OPTIMAL-BP;临床试验(ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04205305)试验,根据EVT前静脉注射tPA的使用情况将患者分为两组。结果:302例患者中,静脉tPA组98例(32.5%),非静脉tPA组204例(67.5%)。在静脉tPA组,强化血压管理显著降低了良好转换率(强化,27.3% vs常规,51.9%;校正优势比[aOR], 0.36;95%置信区间[CI], 0.13-0.93;P = 0.04)。在非静脉tPA组中,强化和常规BP管理之间良好结局的风险差率无显著差异(44.1% vs 55.9%;优势比,0.62;95% ci, 0.31-1.22;P = 0.17)。值得注意的是,静脉注射tPA组36小时内恶性脑水肿的比例,强化管理组(18.2%)明显高于常规管理组(1.9%);优势比,10.72;95% ci, 1.24-92.29;P = 0.03)。在两个研究组中,强化和常规BP管理之间的sICH和死亡率没有显著差异。结论:在EVT前接受静脉tPA治疗的患者中,强化血压管理会使EVT成功后3个月的功能结果恶化,而不会减少siich,表明在这一人群中降压应谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of blood pressure lowering in patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis before endovascular thrombectomy.

Background: The effects of blood pressure (BP) lowering in patients treated with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV tPA) before endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) are unclear.

Aims: This study aims to investigate whether intensive and conventional BP management affects outcomes differently, depending on IV tPA administration before EVT.

Methods: In this subgroup analysis of the Outcome in Patients Treated with Intra-Arterial Thrombectomy-Optimal Blood Pressure Control (OPTIMAL-BP; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04205305) trial, patients were divided into groups based on IV tPA use before EVT. Clinical outcomes of intensive (systolic BP target < 140 mm Hg) or conventional BP management (systolic BP target 140-180 mm Hg) were compared among groups. The primary efficacy outcome was a favorable outcome at 3 months (modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2). Primary safety outcomes included symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) within 36 h and stroke-related death within 3 months.

Results: Among the 302 patients, the IV tPA group included 98 (32.5%) and the non-IV tPA group comprised 204 subjects (67.5%). In the IV tPA group, intensive BP management significantly lowered the favorable outcome rate (intensive, 27.3% vs. conventional, 51.9%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.13-0.93; p = 0.04). In the non-IV tPA group, the risk difference rate of favorable outcome was not significantly different between intensive and conventional BP management (44.1% vs. 55.9%; aOR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.31-1.22; p = 0.17). Notably, the proportion of malignant cerebral edema within 36 h in the IV tPA group was significantly higher in the intensive management group (18.2%) than in the conventional management group (1.9%; aOR, 10.72; 95% CI, 1.24-92.29; p = 0.03). sICH and mortality rates were not significantly different between intensive and conventional BP management in either study groups.

Conclusions: Intensive BP management worsens 3-month functional outcomes after successful EVT without reducing sICH among patients who received IV tPA before EVT, indicating that BP lowering in this population should be cautious.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Stroke
International Journal of Stroke 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
13.90
自引率
6.00%
发文量
132
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Stroke is a welcome addition to the international stroke journal landscape in that it concentrates on the clinical aspects of stroke with basic science contributions in areas of clinical interest. Reviews of current topics are broadly based to encompass not only recent advances of global interest but also those which may be more important in certain regions and the journal regularly features items of news interest from all parts of the world. To facilitate the international nature of the journal, our Associate Editors from Europe, Asia, North America and South America coordinate segments of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信