Mohammad S Ali, Jae Ahn, N Joseph Espat, Abdul S Calvino, James Koness, Ponnandai Somasundar, Steve Kwon
{"title":"在晚期III期和IV期黑色素瘤中使用新型癌症疗法的差异和结果的差异。","authors":"Mohammad S Ali, Jae Ahn, N Joseph Espat, Abdul S Calvino, James Koness, Ponnandai Somasundar, Steve Kwon","doi":"10.1080/1750743X.2025.2452836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Significant gains in advanced melanoma have been made through immunotherapy trials. Factors influencing equitable access and survival impact of these novel therapies are not well-defined.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Retrospective analysis using National Cancer Database of patients with advanced stage III and IV melanoma from 2004 to 2021. Multivariable logistic regression was used to study the use of immunotherapy and Cox proportional hazard regression to evaluate overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>47,427 patients with increasing utilization of immunotherapy from 13.78% in 2004 to 65.88% by 2021. Inequitable adoption were impacted by age, sex, socioeconomic status/affordability, insurance types and residential educational/income level. Receiving immunotherapy was associated with a 44% improvement in OS (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.54-0.57) and receiving a clinical trial-based therapy was associated with a 37% improvement (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.53-0.75). Among patients who received immunotherapy or clinical trial-base therapy, there was 40% worse survival in non-Hispanic Black patients (HR 1.40, 95% CI 1.16-1.69) compared to non-Hispanic Whites.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There are disparities in utilization of immunotherapy that is influenced by socioeconomic status. Race and ethnicity had a significant influence in differential impact on survival outcomes of immunotherapies highlighting the importance of increasing underrepresented population participation in trials that lead to novel therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":13328,"journal":{"name":"Immunotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"37-46"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11834448/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disparities in utilization of novel cancer therapies in advanced stage III and IV melanoma and variance in outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad S Ali, Jae Ahn, N Joseph Espat, Abdul S Calvino, James Koness, Ponnandai Somasundar, Steve Kwon\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1750743X.2025.2452836\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Significant gains in advanced melanoma have been made through immunotherapy trials. Factors influencing equitable access and survival impact of these novel therapies are not well-defined.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Retrospective analysis using National Cancer Database of patients with advanced stage III and IV melanoma from 2004 to 2021. Multivariable logistic regression was used to study the use of immunotherapy and Cox proportional hazard regression to evaluate overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>47,427 patients with increasing utilization of immunotherapy from 13.78% in 2004 to 65.88% by 2021. Inequitable adoption were impacted by age, sex, socioeconomic status/affordability, insurance types and residential educational/income level. Receiving immunotherapy was associated with a 44% improvement in OS (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.54-0.57) and receiving a clinical trial-based therapy was associated with a 37% improvement (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.53-0.75). Among patients who received immunotherapy or clinical trial-base therapy, there was 40% worse survival in non-Hispanic Black patients (HR 1.40, 95% CI 1.16-1.69) compared to non-Hispanic Whites.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There are disparities in utilization of immunotherapy that is influenced by socioeconomic status. Race and ethnicity had a significant influence in differential impact on survival outcomes of immunotherapies highlighting the importance of increasing underrepresented population participation in trials that lead to novel therapies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13328,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Immunotherapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"37-46\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11834448/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Immunotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1750743X.2025.2452836\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Immunotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1750743X.2025.2452836","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导读:通过免疫治疗试验,晚期黑色素瘤取得了显著进展。影响这些新疗法的公平获取和生存影响的因素尚未明确界定。方法:利用国家癌症数据库对2004年至2021年晚期III期和IV期黑色素瘤患者进行回顾性分析。采用多变量logistic回归研究免疫治疗的使用情况,并采用Cox比例风险回归评估总生存期(OS)。结果:47427例患者免疫治疗使用率从2004年的13.78%提高到2021年的65.88%。不公平收养受年龄、性别、社会经济地位/负担能力、保险类型和居民教育/收入水平的影响。接受免疫治疗与44%的OS改善相关(HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.54-0.57),接受基于临床试验的治疗与37%的OS改善相关(HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.53-0.75)。在接受免疫治疗或临床试验基础治疗的患者中,非西班牙裔黑人患者的生存率比非西班牙裔白人患者低40% (HR 1.40, 95% CI 1.16-1.69)。结论:受社会经济地位的影响,免疫治疗的利用存在差异。种族和民族对免疫疗法的生存结果的不同影响有显著影响,这突出了在导致新疗法的试验中增加代表性不足的人群参与的重要性。
Disparities in utilization of novel cancer therapies in advanced stage III and IV melanoma and variance in outcomes.
Introduction: Significant gains in advanced melanoma have been made through immunotherapy trials. Factors influencing equitable access and survival impact of these novel therapies are not well-defined.
Method: Retrospective analysis using National Cancer Database of patients with advanced stage III and IV melanoma from 2004 to 2021. Multivariable logistic regression was used to study the use of immunotherapy and Cox proportional hazard regression to evaluate overall survival (OS).
Results: 47,427 patients with increasing utilization of immunotherapy from 13.78% in 2004 to 65.88% by 2021. Inequitable adoption were impacted by age, sex, socioeconomic status/affordability, insurance types and residential educational/income level. Receiving immunotherapy was associated with a 44% improvement in OS (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.54-0.57) and receiving a clinical trial-based therapy was associated with a 37% improvement (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.53-0.75). Among patients who received immunotherapy or clinical trial-base therapy, there was 40% worse survival in non-Hispanic Black patients (HR 1.40, 95% CI 1.16-1.69) compared to non-Hispanic Whites.
Conclusion: There are disparities in utilization of immunotherapy that is influenced by socioeconomic status. Race and ethnicity had a significant influence in differential impact on survival outcomes of immunotherapies highlighting the importance of increasing underrepresented population participation in trials that lead to novel therapies.
期刊介绍:
Many aspects of the immune system and mechanisms of immunomodulatory therapies remain to be elucidated in order to exploit fully the emerging opportunities. Those involved in the research and clinical applications of immunotherapy are challenged by the huge and intricate volumes of knowledge arising from this fast-evolving field. The journal Immunotherapy offers the scientific community an interdisciplinary forum, providing them with information on the most recent advances of various aspects of immunotherapies, in a concise format to aid navigation of this complex field.
Immunotherapy delivers essential information in concise, at-a-glance article formats. Key advances in the field are reported and analyzed by international experts, providing an authoritative but accessible forum for this vitally important area of research. Unsolicited article proposals are welcomed and authors are required to comply fully with the journal''s Disclosure & Conflict of Interest Policy as well as major publishing guidelines, including ICMJE and GPP3.