手辅助腹腔镜肾上腺切除术与腹腔镜肾上腺切除术治疗大嗜铬细胞瘤的比较:一项回顾性研究。

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Gland surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-31 Epub Date: 2024-12-27 DOI:10.21037/gs-24-407
Qihao Sun, Yuxin Liu, Houtao Long, Daofeng Zhang, Haorui Li, Xiaoliang Sun, Yong Zhao, Haiyang Zhang
{"title":"手辅助腹腔镜肾上腺切除术与腹腔镜肾上腺切除术治疗大嗜铬细胞瘤的比较:一项回顾性研究。","authors":"Qihao Sun, Yuxin Liu, Houtao Long, Daofeng Zhang, Haorui Li, Xiaoliang Sun, Yong Zhao, Haiyang Zhang","doi":"10.21037/gs-24-407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It remains uncertain whether hand-assisted laparoscopic adrenalectomy (HAL) has advantages in treating large pheochromocytomas (PHEOs). This study aimed to assess the feasibility and safety of HAL compared to laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective study on patients with PHEOs ≥6 cm who received HAL (n=16) and LA (n=20) at Shandong Provincial Hospital from January 2020 to January 2023. The two groups were balanced into 8 pairs using propensity score matching (PSM). Perioperative parameters and long-term follow-up outcomes were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After adjusting for balance through PSM, patients in the HAL group had shorter operation time (105.00±18.52 <i>vs.</i> 147.50±7.07 minutes, P<0.001), faster bowel recovery days (1.0 <i>vs.</i> 2.0 days, P=0.043), and shorter postoperative hospital stays (5.00 <i>vs.</i> 7.50 days, P=0.01). The differences in blood pressure improvement within 3 months postoperatively, and recurrence and metastasis between the two groups (75.00% <i>vs.</i> 62.50%, P>0.99; 12.50% <i>vs.</i> 12.50%, P>0.99) were not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggested that HAL was feasible and safe for patients with large PHEOs. Both HAL and LA showed comparable perioperative and long-term follow-up results.</p>","PeriodicalId":12760,"journal":{"name":"Gland surgery","volume":"13 12","pages":"2348-2358"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11733643/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of hand-assisted laparoscopic adrenalectomy <i>vs.</i> laparoscopic adrenalectomy for large pheochromocytomas: a retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Qihao Sun, Yuxin Liu, Houtao Long, Daofeng Zhang, Haorui Li, Xiaoliang Sun, Yong Zhao, Haiyang Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/gs-24-407\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It remains uncertain whether hand-assisted laparoscopic adrenalectomy (HAL) has advantages in treating large pheochromocytomas (PHEOs). This study aimed to assess the feasibility and safety of HAL compared to laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective study on patients with PHEOs ≥6 cm who received HAL (n=16) and LA (n=20) at Shandong Provincial Hospital from January 2020 to January 2023. The two groups were balanced into 8 pairs using propensity score matching (PSM). Perioperative parameters and long-term follow-up outcomes were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After adjusting for balance through PSM, patients in the HAL group had shorter operation time (105.00±18.52 <i>vs.</i> 147.50±7.07 minutes, P<0.001), faster bowel recovery days (1.0 <i>vs.</i> 2.0 days, P=0.043), and shorter postoperative hospital stays (5.00 <i>vs.</i> 7.50 days, P=0.01). The differences in blood pressure improvement within 3 months postoperatively, and recurrence and metastasis between the two groups (75.00% <i>vs.</i> 62.50%, P>0.99; 12.50% <i>vs.</i> 12.50%, P>0.99) were not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggested that HAL was feasible and safe for patients with large PHEOs. Both HAL and LA showed comparable perioperative and long-term follow-up results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12760,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gland surgery\",\"volume\":\"13 12\",\"pages\":\"2348-2358\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11733643/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gland surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/gs-24-407\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gland surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/gs-24-407","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:手辅助腹腔镜肾上腺切除术(HAL)在治疗大嗜铬细胞瘤(PHEOs)中是否有优势尚不确定。本研究旨在评估HAL与腹腔镜肾上腺切除术(LA)的可行性和安全性。方法:对2020年1月至2023年1月在山东省立医院接受HAL (n=16)和LA (n=20)的pheo≥6 cm患者进行回顾性研究。采用倾向评分匹配法(PSM)将两组均衡为8对。比较两组围手术期参数及长期随访结果。结果:HAL组患者经PSM调节平衡后,手术时间(105.00±18.52 vs 147.50±7.07 min, P=0.043)缩短,术后住院时间(5.00 vs 7.50 d, P=0.01)缩短。两组术后3个月内血压改善及复发转移差异(75.00% vs. 62.50%, P < 0.99;12.50% vs. 12.50%, P < 0.99),差异无统计学意义。结论:本研究提示HAL对于大pheo患者是可行且安全的。HAL和LA的围手术期和长期随访结果相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of hand-assisted laparoscopic adrenalectomy vs. laparoscopic adrenalectomy for large pheochromocytomas: a retrospective study.

Background: It remains uncertain whether hand-assisted laparoscopic adrenalectomy (HAL) has advantages in treating large pheochromocytomas (PHEOs). This study aimed to assess the feasibility and safety of HAL compared to laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA).

Methods: We conducted a retrospective study on patients with PHEOs ≥6 cm who received HAL (n=16) and LA (n=20) at Shandong Provincial Hospital from January 2020 to January 2023. The two groups were balanced into 8 pairs using propensity score matching (PSM). Perioperative parameters and long-term follow-up outcomes were compared between the two groups.

Results: After adjusting for balance through PSM, patients in the HAL group had shorter operation time (105.00±18.52 vs. 147.50±7.07 minutes, P<0.001), faster bowel recovery days (1.0 vs. 2.0 days, P=0.043), and shorter postoperative hospital stays (5.00 vs. 7.50 days, P=0.01). The differences in blood pressure improvement within 3 months postoperatively, and recurrence and metastasis between the two groups (75.00% vs. 62.50%, P>0.99; 12.50% vs. 12.50%, P>0.99) were not statistically significant.

Conclusions: This study suggested that HAL was feasible and safe for patients with large PHEOs. Both HAL and LA showed comparable perioperative and long-term follow-up results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gland surgery
Gland surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: Gland Surgery (Gland Surg; GS, Print ISSN 2227-684X; Online ISSN 2227-8575) being indexed by PubMed/PubMed Central, is an open access, peer-review journal launched at May of 2012, published bio-monthly since February 2015.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信