意大利内窥镜逆行胆管造影(ERCP)手术后感染的经济负担。

IF 0.4 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Global & Regional Health Technology Assessment Pub Date : 2024-12-31 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.33393/grhta.2024.3186
Paolo Sciattella, Annarosa Fornero, Susanna M A Giordano, Claudio G De Angelis, Francesco Cattel
{"title":"意大利内窥镜逆行胆管造影(ERCP)手术后感染的经济负担。","authors":"Paolo Sciattella, Annarosa Fornero, Susanna M A Giordano, Claudio G De Angelis, Francesco Cattel","doi":"10.33393/grhta.2024.3186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The infections of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) associated with duodenoscopes during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) procedure have become a significant cause for concern, especially in fragile patients. While the clinical impacts of these infections are well-documented, their economic implications remain underexplored. This study assesses the incidence and economic burden of post-ERCP infections in Italy using an administrative database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective observational study using administrative databases from A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino. The study included all patients who underwent their first inpatient ERCP between 2018 and 2021. Infections were identified using ICD-9-CM codes for <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i>, <i>Clostridium difficile</i>, <i>Escherichia coli</i>, <i>Klebsiella</i> spp., and <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>. A 1-year follow-up was defined in order to estimate healthcare resource utilization and related costs, including readmissions, drug prescriptions, and outpatient specialist and laboratory services.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 686 inpatient ERCP cases, an overall infection rate of 4.2% was observed. Higher infection rates were observed in women (4.6%), patients over 70 years old (4.6%), emergency admissions (5.1%), and transplant patients (19.1%). The average hospital stay doubled for infected patients (24.3 vs. 11.3 days; p=0.001). Post-ERCP infections led to a 28% increase in average costs (€12,256 vs. €9,561; p=0.048). With an annual volume of 25,000 ERCP procedures, post-ERCP infections in Italy contribute approximately €2.9 million in additional direct costs per year.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Post-ERCP infections impose substantial financial burdens on the healthcare system, underscoring the critical importance of implementing cost-effective prevention strategies to mitigate this public health threat in Italy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12627,"journal":{"name":"Global & Regional Health Technology Assessment","volume":"11 ","pages":"258-264"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11736644/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The economic burden of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) procedure infections in Italy.\",\"authors\":\"Paolo Sciattella, Annarosa Fornero, Susanna M A Giordano, Claudio G De Angelis, Francesco Cattel\",\"doi\":\"10.33393/grhta.2024.3186\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The infections of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) associated with duodenoscopes during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) procedure have become a significant cause for concern, especially in fragile patients. While the clinical impacts of these infections are well-documented, their economic implications remain underexplored. This study assesses the incidence and economic burden of post-ERCP infections in Italy using an administrative database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective observational study using administrative databases from A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino. The study included all patients who underwent their first inpatient ERCP between 2018 and 2021. Infections were identified using ICD-9-CM codes for <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i>, <i>Clostridium difficile</i>, <i>Escherichia coli</i>, <i>Klebsiella</i> spp., and <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>. A 1-year follow-up was defined in order to estimate healthcare resource utilization and related costs, including readmissions, drug prescriptions, and outpatient specialist and laboratory services.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 686 inpatient ERCP cases, an overall infection rate of 4.2% was observed. Higher infection rates were observed in women (4.6%), patients over 70 years old (4.6%), emergency admissions (5.1%), and transplant patients (19.1%). The average hospital stay doubled for infected patients (24.3 vs. 11.3 days; p=0.001). Post-ERCP infections led to a 28% increase in average costs (€12,256 vs. €9,561; p=0.048). With an annual volume of 25,000 ERCP procedures, post-ERCP infections in Italy contribute approximately €2.9 million in additional direct costs per year.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Post-ERCP infections impose substantial financial burdens on the healthcare system, underscoring the critical importance of implementing cost-effective prevention strategies to mitigate this public health threat in Italy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12627,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global & Regional Health Technology Assessment\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"258-264\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11736644/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global & Regional Health Technology Assessment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33393/grhta.2024.3186\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global & Regional Health Technology Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33393/grhta.2024.3186","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:内镜逆行胆管胰胆管造影(ERCP)过程中与十二指肠镜相关的多药耐药菌(mdro)感染已成为引起关注的重要原因,特别是在虚弱的患者中。虽然这些感染的临床影响有充分的记录,但其经济影响仍未得到充分探讨。本研究使用管理数据库评估意大利ercp感染后的发病率和经济负担。方法:我们使用来自都灵的A.O.U. citt della Salute e della Scienza di Torino的行政数据库进行回顾性观察研究。该研究包括2018年至2021年期间首次接受ERCP住院治疗的所有患者。使用ICD-9-CM编码对铜绿假单胞菌、艰难梭菌、大肠埃希菌、克雷伯氏菌和金黄色葡萄球菌进行感染鉴定。为了估计医疗资源利用和相关费用,包括再入院、药物处方、门诊专科和实验室服务,定义了1年的随访。结果:共纳入住院ERCP患者686例,总感染率为4.2%。女性(4.6%)、70岁以上患者(4.6%)、急诊患者(5.1%)和移植患者(19.1%)的感染率较高。感染患者的平均住院时间翻了一番(24.3天vs 11.3天;p = 0.001)。ercp感染导致平均成本增加28%(12,256欧元vs 9,561欧元);p = 0.048)。意大利每年有2.5万例ERCP手术,ERCP术后感染每年带来约290万欧元的额外直接成本。结论:ercp后感染给医疗保健系统带来了巨大的经济负担,强调了在意大利实施具有成本效益的预防策略以减轻这一公共卫生威胁的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The economic burden of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) procedure infections in Italy.

Introduction: The infections of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) associated with duodenoscopes during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) procedure have become a significant cause for concern, especially in fragile patients. While the clinical impacts of these infections are well-documented, their economic implications remain underexplored. This study assesses the incidence and economic burden of post-ERCP infections in Italy using an administrative database.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational study using administrative databases from A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino. The study included all patients who underwent their first inpatient ERCP between 2018 and 2021. Infections were identified using ICD-9-CM codes for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Clostridium difficile, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp., and Staphylococcus aureus. A 1-year follow-up was defined in order to estimate healthcare resource utilization and related costs, including readmissions, drug prescriptions, and outpatient specialist and laboratory services.

Results: The study included 686 inpatient ERCP cases, an overall infection rate of 4.2% was observed. Higher infection rates were observed in women (4.6%), patients over 70 years old (4.6%), emergency admissions (5.1%), and transplant patients (19.1%). The average hospital stay doubled for infected patients (24.3 vs. 11.3 days; p=0.001). Post-ERCP infections led to a 28% increase in average costs (€12,256 vs. €9,561; p=0.048). With an annual volume of 25,000 ERCP procedures, post-ERCP infections in Italy contribute approximately €2.9 million in additional direct costs per year.

Conclusion: Post-ERCP infections impose substantial financial burdens on the healthcare system, underscoring the critical importance of implementing cost-effective prevention strategies to mitigate this public health threat in Italy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global & Regional Health Technology Assessment
Global & Regional Health Technology Assessment HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Global & Regional Health Technology Assessment (GRHTA) is a peer-reviewed, open access journal which aims to promote health technology assessment and economic evaluation, enabling choices among alternative therapeutical paths or procedures with different clinical and economic outcomes. GRHTA is a unique journal having three different editorial boards who focus on their respective geographical expertise.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信