Michael S Hisey, Emily C Courtois, Donna D Ohnmeiss
{"title":"颈椎间关节装置的使用及相关临床结果。","authors":"Michael S Hisey, Emily C Courtois, Donna D Ohnmeiss","doi":"10.1007/s00586-024-08626-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to investigate the outcomes of minimally invasive PCF using an interfacet joint fusion cage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The inclusion criteria consisted of patients who underwent a PCF using an interfacet device (Cavux, Providence Medical Technology Inc.) at a single institution and were at least 6 months postoperative. Charts were reviewed for pre-, intra- and postoperative data including arm and neck pain scores, Neck Disability Index (NDI), complications, and reoperations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A consecutive series of 51 patients were included. Mean age was 54.9 years and 72.6% of patients (n = 37) were female. Most patients (n = 39, 76.5%) had a prior anterior cervical fusion resulting in pseudarthrosis. In total, 157 interfacet devices were implanted in 79 levels. There was statistically significant improvement from pre- to postoperative arm pain (3.8 vs. 2.4), neck pain (6.2 vs. 4.0), and NDI (42.2 vs. 34.9). With the exception of neck pain, these changes would not generally be considered clinically relevant. Ten (19.6%) reoperations occurred, with 4 (7.8%) involving interfacet device removal. The removals were due to: nonunion, device malpositioning, osteophytic overgrowth, trauma, and implantation of additional posterior instrumentation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Performing a minimally invasive facet fusion may be an effective option for treating patients with a history of nonunion. Although the reoperation rate was high in this challenging cohort, only 4 out of 10 reoperations required device removal. More research is warranted to refine indications for this procedure and review larger samples of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12323,"journal":{"name":"European Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1211-1217"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The use of cervical interfacet devices and related clinical outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Michael S Hisey, Emily C Courtois, Donna D Ohnmeiss\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00586-024-08626-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to investigate the outcomes of minimally invasive PCF using an interfacet joint fusion cage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The inclusion criteria consisted of patients who underwent a PCF using an interfacet device (Cavux, Providence Medical Technology Inc.) at a single institution and were at least 6 months postoperative. Charts were reviewed for pre-, intra- and postoperative data including arm and neck pain scores, Neck Disability Index (NDI), complications, and reoperations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A consecutive series of 51 patients were included. Mean age was 54.9 years and 72.6% of patients (n = 37) were female. Most patients (n = 39, 76.5%) had a prior anterior cervical fusion resulting in pseudarthrosis. In total, 157 interfacet devices were implanted in 79 levels. There was statistically significant improvement from pre- to postoperative arm pain (3.8 vs. 2.4), neck pain (6.2 vs. 4.0), and NDI (42.2 vs. 34.9). With the exception of neck pain, these changes would not generally be considered clinically relevant. Ten (19.6%) reoperations occurred, with 4 (7.8%) involving interfacet device removal. The removals were due to: nonunion, device malpositioning, osteophytic overgrowth, trauma, and implantation of additional posterior instrumentation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Performing a minimally invasive facet fusion may be an effective option for treating patients with a history of nonunion. Although the reoperation rate was high in this challenging cohort, only 4 out of 10 reoperations required device removal. More research is warranted to refine indications for this procedure and review larger samples of patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12323,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Spine Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1211-1217\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Spine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-024-08626-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-024-08626-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究的目的是探讨微创椎间关节融合器治疗PCF的结果。方法:纳入标准包括在单一机构使用关节间装置(Cavux, Providence Medical Technology Inc.)进行PCF且术后至少6个月的患者。回顾了术前、术中和术后的数据,包括手臂和颈部疼痛评分、颈部残疾指数(NDI)、并发症和再手术。结果:连续纳入51例患者。平均年龄54.9岁,女性占72.6% (n = 37)。大多数患者(n = 39, 76.5%)之前有颈椎前路融合导致假关节。共在79个节段植入157个关节间关节装置。从术前到术后,手臂疼痛(3.8 vs. 2.4)、颈部疼痛(6.2 vs. 4.0)和NDI (42.2 vs. 34.9)的改善有统计学意义。除了颈部疼痛外,这些变化通常不被认为与临床相关。10例(19.6%)再次手术,其中4例(7.8%)涉及关节间装置移除。手术切除的原因包括:骨不连、器械错位、骨赘过度生长、外伤和植入额外的后路内固定。结论:微创关节突融合术可能是治疗骨不连患者的有效选择。尽管在这个具有挑战性的队列中再手术率很高,但10例再手术中只有4例需要移除器械。需要更多的研究来完善该手术的适应症,并审查更大的患者样本。
The use of cervical interfacet devices and related clinical outcomes.
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the outcomes of minimally invasive PCF using an interfacet joint fusion cage.
Methods: The inclusion criteria consisted of patients who underwent a PCF using an interfacet device (Cavux, Providence Medical Technology Inc.) at a single institution and were at least 6 months postoperative. Charts were reviewed for pre-, intra- and postoperative data including arm and neck pain scores, Neck Disability Index (NDI), complications, and reoperations.
Results: A consecutive series of 51 patients were included. Mean age was 54.9 years and 72.6% of patients (n = 37) were female. Most patients (n = 39, 76.5%) had a prior anterior cervical fusion resulting in pseudarthrosis. In total, 157 interfacet devices were implanted in 79 levels. There was statistically significant improvement from pre- to postoperative arm pain (3.8 vs. 2.4), neck pain (6.2 vs. 4.0), and NDI (42.2 vs. 34.9). With the exception of neck pain, these changes would not generally be considered clinically relevant. Ten (19.6%) reoperations occurred, with 4 (7.8%) involving interfacet device removal. The removals were due to: nonunion, device malpositioning, osteophytic overgrowth, trauma, and implantation of additional posterior instrumentation.
Conclusion: Performing a minimally invasive facet fusion may be an effective option for treating patients with a history of nonunion. Although the reoperation rate was high in this challenging cohort, only 4 out of 10 reoperations required device removal. More research is warranted to refine indications for this procedure and review larger samples of patients.
期刊介绍:
"European Spine Journal" is a publication founded in response to the increasing trend toward specialization in spinal surgery and spinal pathology in general. The Journal is devoted to all spine related disciplines, including functional and surgical anatomy of the spine, biomechanics and pathophysiology, diagnostic procedures, and neurology, surgery and outcomes. The aim of "European Spine Journal" is to support the further development of highly innovative spine treatments including but not restricted to surgery and to provide an integrated and balanced view of diagnostic, research and treatment procedures as well as outcomes that will enhance effective collaboration among specialists worldwide. The “European Spine Journal” also participates in education by means of videos, interactive meetings and the endorsement of educative efforts.
Official publication of EUROSPINE, The Spine Society of Europe