Ram N. Yadav , Daniel J. Oravec , Joshua Drost , Michael J. Flynn , George W. Divine , Sudhaker D. Rao , Yener N. Yeni
{"title":"从数字断层合成得到的纹理和几何测量区分有和没有椎体骨折的妇女。","authors":"Ram N. Yadav , Daniel J. Oravec , Joshua Drost , Michael J. Flynn , George W. Divine , Sudhaker D. Rao , Yener N. Yeni","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.111925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Vertebral fractures are a common and debilitating consequence of osteoporosis. Bone mineral density (BMD), measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), is the clinical standard for assessing overall bone quantity but falls short in accurately predicting vertebral fracture. Fracture risk prediction may be improved by incorporating metrics of microstructural organization from an appropriate imaging modality. Digital tomosynthesis (DTS)-derived textural and microstructural parameters have been previously correlated to vertebral bone strength <em>in vitro</em>, but the <em>in vivo</em> utility has not been explored. Therefore, the current study sought to establish the extent to which DTS-derived measurements of vertebral microstructure and size discriminate patients with and without vertebral fracture. In a cohort of 93 postmenopausal women with or without history of vertebral fracture, DTS-derived microstructural parameters and vertebral width were calculated for T12 and L1 vertebrae, as well as lumbar spine BMD and trabecular bone score (TBS) from DXA images. Fracture patients had lower BMD and TBS, while DTS-derived degree of anisotropy and vertebral width were higher, compared to nonfracture (p < 0.02 to p < 0.003) patients. The addition of DTS-derived parameters (fractal dimension, lacunarity, degree of anisotropy and vertebral width) improved discriminative capability for models of fracture status (AUC = 0.79) compared to BMD alone (AUC = 0.67). For twelve additional participants who were imaged twice, <em>in vivo</em> repeatability errors for DTS parameters were low (0.2 % − 7.3 %). The current results support the complementary use of DTS imaging for assessing bone quality and improving the accuracy of fracture risk assessment beyond that achievable by DXA alone.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12063,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology","volume":"183 ","pages":"Article 111925"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Textural and geometric measures derived from digital tomosynthesis discriminate women with and without vertebral fracture\",\"authors\":\"Ram N. Yadav , Daniel J. Oravec , Joshua Drost , Michael J. Flynn , George W. Divine , Sudhaker D. Rao , Yener N. Yeni\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.111925\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Vertebral fractures are a common and debilitating consequence of osteoporosis. Bone mineral density (BMD), measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), is the clinical standard for assessing overall bone quantity but falls short in accurately predicting vertebral fracture. Fracture risk prediction may be improved by incorporating metrics of microstructural organization from an appropriate imaging modality. Digital tomosynthesis (DTS)-derived textural and microstructural parameters have been previously correlated to vertebral bone strength <em>in vitro</em>, but the <em>in vivo</em> utility has not been explored. Therefore, the current study sought to establish the extent to which DTS-derived measurements of vertebral microstructure and size discriminate patients with and without vertebral fracture. In a cohort of 93 postmenopausal women with or without history of vertebral fracture, DTS-derived microstructural parameters and vertebral width were calculated for T12 and L1 vertebrae, as well as lumbar spine BMD and trabecular bone score (TBS) from DXA images. Fracture patients had lower BMD and TBS, while DTS-derived degree of anisotropy and vertebral width were higher, compared to nonfracture (p < 0.02 to p < 0.003) patients. The addition of DTS-derived parameters (fractal dimension, lacunarity, degree of anisotropy and vertebral width) improved discriminative capability for models of fracture status (AUC = 0.79) compared to BMD alone (AUC = 0.67). For twelve additional participants who were imaged twice, <em>in vivo</em> repeatability errors for DTS parameters were low (0.2 % − 7.3 %). The current results support the complementary use of DTS imaging for assessing bone quality and improving the accuracy of fracture risk assessment beyond that achievable by DXA alone.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12063,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":\"183 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111925\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X25000117\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X25000117","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Textural and geometric measures derived from digital tomosynthesis discriminate women with and without vertebral fracture
Vertebral fractures are a common and debilitating consequence of osteoporosis. Bone mineral density (BMD), measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), is the clinical standard for assessing overall bone quantity but falls short in accurately predicting vertebral fracture. Fracture risk prediction may be improved by incorporating metrics of microstructural organization from an appropriate imaging modality. Digital tomosynthesis (DTS)-derived textural and microstructural parameters have been previously correlated to vertebral bone strength in vitro, but the in vivo utility has not been explored. Therefore, the current study sought to establish the extent to which DTS-derived measurements of vertebral microstructure and size discriminate patients with and without vertebral fracture. In a cohort of 93 postmenopausal women with or without history of vertebral fracture, DTS-derived microstructural parameters and vertebral width were calculated for T12 and L1 vertebrae, as well as lumbar spine BMD and trabecular bone score (TBS) from DXA images. Fracture patients had lower BMD and TBS, while DTS-derived degree of anisotropy and vertebral width were higher, compared to nonfracture (p < 0.02 to p < 0.003) patients. The addition of DTS-derived parameters (fractal dimension, lacunarity, degree of anisotropy and vertebral width) improved discriminative capability for models of fracture status (AUC = 0.79) compared to BMD alone (AUC = 0.67). For twelve additional participants who were imaged twice, in vivo repeatability errors for DTS parameters were low (0.2 % − 7.3 %). The current results support the complementary use of DTS imaging for assessing bone quality and improving the accuracy of fracture risk assessment beyond that achievable by DXA alone.
期刊介绍:
European Journal of Radiology is an international journal which aims to communicate to its readers, state-of-the-art information on imaging developments in the form of high quality original research articles and timely reviews on current developments in the field.
Its audience includes clinicians at all levels of training including radiology trainees, newly qualified imaging specialists and the experienced radiologist. Its aim is to inform efficient, appropriate and evidence-based imaging practice to the benefit of patients worldwide.