Duc Trong Quach, Thu Anh Nguyen, Mai Ngoc Luu, Uyen Pham-Phuong Vo, Vy Ly-Thao Tran, Truc Le-Thanh Tran, Tai Duy Nguyen, Nhan Quang Le, Toru Hiyama, Shinji Tanaka
{"title":"与标准结肠镜检查相比,endocff视觉辅助结肠镜检查在更短的停药时间内显著提高了腺瘤的检测:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Duc Trong Quach, Thu Anh Nguyen, Mai Ngoc Luu, Uyen Pham-Phuong Vo, Vy Ly-Thao Tran, Truc Le-Thanh Tran, Tai Duy Nguyen, Nhan Quang Le, Toru Hiyama, Shinji Tanaka","doi":"10.1159/000543630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although several studies in Western countries have shown that Endocuff Vision-assisted colonoscopy (EC) can improve the colorectal adenoma detection rate (ADR), such evidence in Asia is still scarce. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of EC in detecting colorectal adenomas in Vietnamese patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a randomized controlled trial conducted at a tertiary hospital in Vietnam. Subjects aged ≥ 18 years referred for colonoscopy for symptomatic investigation or screening were randomly assigned to the EC group or standard colonoscopy (SC) group. The primary outcome was the ADR. The secondary outcomes included the mean number of adenomas per procedure (MAP), caecal intubation time, and withdrawal time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 476 participants (241 in the EC group, 235 in the SC group) with a median age of 52 (interquartile range [IR]: 46, 58) years. There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding age, sex, smoking status, family history of colorectal cancer or indications for colonoscopy. Compared with the SC group, the EC group had significantly higher ADRs (35.7% vs. 22.6%, p = 0.002) and MAPs (0.68 vs. 0.39, p = 0.004). The intubation durations were comparable between the two groups. The withdrawal time in the EC group was shorter than that in the SC group (median [seconds]: 266 [IR: 224, 314] vs. 360 [IR: 310, 390], p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with SC, EC significantly increased both the ADR and MAP in a shorter inspection time and could be a better choice for colonoscopy screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":11315,"journal":{"name":"Digestion","volume":" ","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endocuff Vision-Assisted Colonoscopy Significantly Improves Adenoma Detection In A Shorter Withdrawal Time Compared With Standard Colonoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Duc Trong Quach, Thu Anh Nguyen, Mai Ngoc Luu, Uyen Pham-Phuong Vo, Vy Ly-Thao Tran, Truc Le-Thanh Tran, Tai Duy Nguyen, Nhan Quang Le, Toru Hiyama, Shinji Tanaka\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000543630\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although several studies in Western countries have shown that Endocuff Vision-assisted colonoscopy (EC) can improve the colorectal adenoma detection rate (ADR), such evidence in Asia is still scarce. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of EC in detecting colorectal adenomas in Vietnamese patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a randomized controlled trial conducted at a tertiary hospital in Vietnam. Subjects aged ≥ 18 years referred for colonoscopy for symptomatic investigation or screening were randomly assigned to the EC group or standard colonoscopy (SC) group. The primary outcome was the ADR. The secondary outcomes included the mean number of adenomas per procedure (MAP), caecal intubation time, and withdrawal time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 476 participants (241 in the EC group, 235 in the SC group) with a median age of 52 (interquartile range [IR]: 46, 58) years. There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding age, sex, smoking status, family history of colorectal cancer or indications for colonoscopy. Compared with the SC group, the EC group had significantly higher ADRs (35.7% vs. 22.6%, p = 0.002) and MAPs (0.68 vs. 0.39, p = 0.004). The intubation durations were comparable between the two groups. The withdrawal time in the EC group was shorter than that in the SC group (median [seconds]: 266 [IR: 224, 314] vs. 360 [IR: 310, 390], p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with SC, EC significantly increased both the ADR and MAP in a shorter inspection time and could be a better choice for colonoscopy screening.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11315,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digestion\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digestion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000543630\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000543630","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导论:虽然西方国家的一些研究表明,endocff Vision-assisted colonoscopy (EC)可以提高结直肠腺瘤的检出率(ADR),但在亚洲,这方面的证据仍然很少。本研究旨在评估EC在越南结直肠腺瘤检测中的表现。方法:在越南某三级医院进行随机对照试验。年龄≥18岁的受试者接受结肠镜检查进行症状调查或筛查,随机分为EC组或标准结肠镜(SC)组。主要结果是ADR。次要结果包括每次手术平均腺瘤数(MAP)、盲肠插管时间和取出时间。结果:共有476名参与者(EC组241名,SC组235名),中位年龄为52岁(四分位数间距[IR]: 46,58)岁。两组在年龄、性别、吸烟状况、结直肠癌家族史或结肠镜检查适应症方面无显著差异。与SC组相比,EC组的adr (35.7% vs. 22.6%, p = 0.002)和MAPs (0.68 vs. 0.39, p = 0.004)显著高于SC组。两组间插管时间具有可比性。EC组的停药时间短于SC组(中位[秒]:266 [IR: 224, 314]对360 [IR: 310, 390], p < 0.001)。结论:与SC相比,EC在较短的检查时间内显著提高了ADR和MAP,可作为结肠镜筛查的更好选择。
Endocuff Vision-Assisted Colonoscopy Significantly Improves Adenoma Detection In A Shorter Withdrawal Time Compared With Standard Colonoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Introduction: Although several studies in Western countries have shown that Endocuff Vision-assisted colonoscopy (EC) can improve the colorectal adenoma detection rate (ADR), such evidence in Asia is still scarce. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of EC in detecting colorectal adenomas in Vietnamese patients.
Methods: This was a randomized controlled trial conducted at a tertiary hospital in Vietnam. Subjects aged ≥ 18 years referred for colonoscopy for symptomatic investigation or screening were randomly assigned to the EC group or standard colonoscopy (SC) group. The primary outcome was the ADR. The secondary outcomes included the mean number of adenomas per procedure (MAP), caecal intubation time, and withdrawal time.
Results: There were 476 participants (241 in the EC group, 235 in the SC group) with a median age of 52 (interquartile range [IR]: 46, 58) years. There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding age, sex, smoking status, family history of colorectal cancer or indications for colonoscopy. Compared with the SC group, the EC group had significantly higher ADRs (35.7% vs. 22.6%, p = 0.002) and MAPs (0.68 vs. 0.39, p = 0.004). The intubation durations were comparable between the two groups. The withdrawal time in the EC group was shorter than that in the SC group (median [seconds]: 266 [IR: 224, 314] vs. 360 [IR: 310, 390], p < 0.001).
Conclusions: Compared with SC, EC significantly increased both the ADR and MAP in a shorter inspection time and could be a better choice for colonoscopy screening.
期刊介绍:
''Digestion'' concentrates on clinical research reports: in addition to editorials and reviews, the journal features sections on Stomach/Esophagus, Bowel, Neuro-Gastroenterology, Liver/Bile, Pancreas, Metabolism/Nutrition and Gastrointestinal Oncology. Papers cover physiology in humans, metabolic studies and clinical work on the etiology, diagnosis, and therapy of human diseases. It is thus especially cut out for gastroenterologists employed in hospitals and outpatient units. Moreover, the journal''s coverage of studies on the metabolism and effects of therapeutic drugs carries considerable value for clinicians and investigators beyond the immediate field of gastroenterology.