新辅助治疗后根治性膀胱切除术在少转移性膀胱癌中是否有作用?

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Current Opinion in Urology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-16 DOI:10.1097/MOU.0000000000001261
Anna Cadenar, Stefano Mancon, Shahrokh F Shariat, David D'Andrea
{"title":"新辅助治疗后根治性膀胱切除术在少转移性膀胱癌中是否有作用?","authors":"Anna Cadenar, Stefano Mancon, Shahrokh F Shariat, David D'Andrea","doi":"10.1097/MOU.0000000000001261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review explores the potential role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by radical cystectomy (RC) for oligometastatic bladder cancer (OMBC) treatment. We focused on extrapolating evidence from studies including lymph node-positive only and metastatic bladder cancer to address the key challenges and therapeutic strategies for OMBC.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Current evidence for NAC and RC in OMBC is limited, with most data derived from studies in locally advanced bladder cancer. NAC has shown efficacy in downstaging and improving survival in patients with locally advanced disease, but its benefits in OMBC remain speculative. Additionally, diagnostic uncertainties, particularly regarding the inclusion of pelvic lymph nodes and the role of FDG-PET/CT, pose significant challenges to accurate staging and treatment decisions. Recent studies highlight the potential of metastasis-directed therapy, but uncertainties remain on patient selection and treatment protocols for OMBC.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>There is need for prospective studies to evaluate neoadjuvant systemic treatments and RC specifically in OMBC. Moreover, resolving current diagnostic challenges is crucial to avoid undertreatment due to inaccurate staging. Until more concrete evidence emerges, changes to standard treatment protocols should be approached with caution and offered only within trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":11093,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Urology","volume":" ","pages":"189-193"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is there a role for neoadjuvant therapies followed by radical cystectomy in oligometastatic bladder cancer?\",\"authors\":\"Anna Cadenar, Stefano Mancon, Shahrokh F Shariat, David D'Andrea\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MOU.0000000000001261\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review explores the potential role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by radical cystectomy (RC) for oligometastatic bladder cancer (OMBC) treatment. We focused on extrapolating evidence from studies including lymph node-positive only and metastatic bladder cancer to address the key challenges and therapeutic strategies for OMBC.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Current evidence for NAC and RC in OMBC is limited, with most data derived from studies in locally advanced bladder cancer. NAC has shown efficacy in downstaging and improving survival in patients with locally advanced disease, but its benefits in OMBC remain speculative. Additionally, diagnostic uncertainties, particularly regarding the inclusion of pelvic lymph nodes and the role of FDG-PET/CT, pose significant challenges to accurate staging and treatment decisions. Recent studies highlight the potential of metastasis-directed therapy, but uncertainties remain on patient selection and treatment protocols for OMBC.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>There is need for prospective studies to evaluate neoadjuvant systemic treatments and RC specifically in OMBC. Moreover, resolving current diagnostic challenges is crucial to avoid undertreatment due to inaccurate staging. Until more concrete evidence emerges, changes to standard treatment protocols should be approached with caution and offered only within trials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Urology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"189-193\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0000000000001261\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0000000000001261","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

综述目的:本综述探讨了新辅助化疗(NAC)加根治性膀胱切除术(RC)在低转移性膀胱癌(OMBC)治疗中的潜在作用。我们将重点从包括淋巴结阳性和转移性膀胱癌在内的研究中推断证据,以解决OMBC的主要挑战和治疗策略。近期发现:目前在OMBC中NAC和RC的证据有限,大多数数据来自局部晚期膀胱癌的研究。NAC在局部晚期疾病患者中显示出降低分期和改善生存的功效,但其在OMBC中的益处仍有待推测。此外,诊断的不确定性,特别是关于盆腔淋巴结的包括和FDG-PET/CT的作用,对准确的分期和治疗决策构成了重大挑战。最近的研究强调了转移导向治疗的潜力,但对于OMBC的患者选择和治疗方案仍然存在不确定性。总结:需要前瞻性研究来评估OMBC的新辅助全身治疗和RC。此外,解决当前的诊断挑战对于避免因分期不准确而导致治疗不足至关重要。在更具体的证据出现之前,对标准治疗方案的改变应该谨慎对待,并且只能在试验中提供。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is there a role for neoadjuvant therapies followed by radical cystectomy in oligometastatic bladder cancer?

Purpose of review: This review explores the potential role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by radical cystectomy (RC) for oligometastatic bladder cancer (OMBC) treatment. We focused on extrapolating evidence from studies including lymph node-positive only and metastatic bladder cancer to address the key challenges and therapeutic strategies for OMBC.

Recent findings: Current evidence for NAC and RC in OMBC is limited, with most data derived from studies in locally advanced bladder cancer. NAC has shown efficacy in downstaging and improving survival in patients with locally advanced disease, but its benefits in OMBC remain speculative. Additionally, diagnostic uncertainties, particularly regarding the inclusion of pelvic lymph nodes and the role of FDG-PET/CT, pose significant challenges to accurate staging and treatment decisions. Recent studies highlight the potential of metastasis-directed therapy, but uncertainties remain on patient selection and treatment protocols for OMBC.

Summary: There is need for prospective studies to evaluate neoadjuvant systemic treatments and RC specifically in OMBC. Moreover, resolving current diagnostic challenges is crucial to avoid undertreatment due to inaccurate staging. Until more concrete evidence emerges, changes to standard treatment protocols should be approached with caution and offered only within trials.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Urology
Current Opinion in Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
4.00%
发文量
140
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​​Current Opinion in Urology delivers a broad-based perspective on the most recent and most exciting developments in urology from across the world. Published bimonthly and featuring ten key topics – including focuses on prostate cancer, bladder cancer and minimally invasive urology – the journal’s renowned team of guest editors ensure a balanced, expert assessment of the recently published literature in each respective field with insightful editorials and on-the-mark invited reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信