Anna Cadenar, Stefano Mancon, Shahrokh F Shariat, David D'Andrea
{"title":"新辅助治疗后根治性膀胱切除术在少转移性膀胱癌中是否有作用?","authors":"Anna Cadenar, Stefano Mancon, Shahrokh F Shariat, David D'Andrea","doi":"10.1097/MOU.0000000000001261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review explores the potential role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by radical cystectomy (RC) for oligometastatic bladder cancer (OMBC) treatment. We focused on extrapolating evidence from studies including lymph node-positive only and metastatic bladder cancer to address the key challenges and therapeutic strategies for OMBC.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Current evidence for NAC and RC in OMBC is limited, with most data derived from studies in locally advanced bladder cancer. NAC has shown efficacy in downstaging and improving survival in patients with locally advanced disease, but its benefits in OMBC remain speculative. Additionally, diagnostic uncertainties, particularly regarding the inclusion of pelvic lymph nodes and the role of FDG-PET/CT, pose significant challenges to accurate staging and treatment decisions. Recent studies highlight the potential of metastasis-directed therapy, but uncertainties remain on patient selection and treatment protocols for OMBC.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>There is need for prospective studies to evaluate neoadjuvant systemic treatments and RC specifically in OMBC. Moreover, resolving current diagnostic challenges is crucial to avoid undertreatment due to inaccurate staging. Until more concrete evidence emerges, changes to standard treatment protocols should be approached with caution and offered only within trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":11093,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Urology","volume":" ","pages":"189-193"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is there a role for neoadjuvant therapies followed by radical cystectomy in oligometastatic bladder cancer?\",\"authors\":\"Anna Cadenar, Stefano Mancon, Shahrokh F Shariat, David D'Andrea\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MOU.0000000000001261\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review explores the potential role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by radical cystectomy (RC) for oligometastatic bladder cancer (OMBC) treatment. We focused on extrapolating evidence from studies including lymph node-positive only and metastatic bladder cancer to address the key challenges and therapeutic strategies for OMBC.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Current evidence for NAC and RC in OMBC is limited, with most data derived from studies in locally advanced bladder cancer. NAC has shown efficacy in downstaging and improving survival in patients with locally advanced disease, but its benefits in OMBC remain speculative. Additionally, diagnostic uncertainties, particularly regarding the inclusion of pelvic lymph nodes and the role of FDG-PET/CT, pose significant challenges to accurate staging and treatment decisions. Recent studies highlight the potential of metastasis-directed therapy, but uncertainties remain on patient selection and treatment protocols for OMBC.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>There is need for prospective studies to evaluate neoadjuvant systemic treatments and RC specifically in OMBC. Moreover, resolving current diagnostic challenges is crucial to avoid undertreatment due to inaccurate staging. Until more concrete evidence emerges, changes to standard treatment protocols should be approached with caution and offered only within trials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Urology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"189-193\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0000000000001261\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0000000000001261","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Is there a role for neoadjuvant therapies followed by radical cystectomy in oligometastatic bladder cancer?
Purpose of review: This review explores the potential role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by radical cystectomy (RC) for oligometastatic bladder cancer (OMBC) treatment. We focused on extrapolating evidence from studies including lymph node-positive only and metastatic bladder cancer to address the key challenges and therapeutic strategies for OMBC.
Recent findings: Current evidence for NAC and RC in OMBC is limited, with most data derived from studies in locally advanced bladder cancer. NAC has shown efficacy in downstaging and improving survival in patients with locally advanced disease, but its benefits in OMBC remain speculative. Additionally, diagnostic uncertainties, particularly regarding the inclusion of pelvic lymph nodes and the role of FDG-PET/CT, pose significant challenges to accurate staging and treatment decisions. Recent studies highlight the potential of metastasis-directed therapy, but uncertainties remain on patient selection and treatment protocols for OMBC.
Summary: There is need for prospective studies to evaluate neoadjuvant systemic treatments and RC specifically in OMBC. Moreover, resolving current diagnostic challenges is crucial to avoid undertreatment due to inaccurate staging. Until more concrete evidence emerges, changes to standard treatment protocols should be approached with caution and offered only within trials.
期刊介绍:
Current Opinion in Urology delivers a broad-based perspective on the most recent and most exciting developments in urology from across the world. Published bimonthly and featuring ten key topics – including focuses on prostate cancer, bladder cancer and minimally invasive urology – the journal’s renowned team of guest editors ensure a balanced, expert assessment of the recently published literature in each respective field with insightful editorials and on-the-mark invited reviews.