Nami Yeyin, Mohammad Abuqbeitah, Aysel Namazova, Mustafa Demir
{"title":"99mTc-MAA与90Y-PET/ mr剂量法在肝脏恶性肿瘤选择性内放射治疗(SIRT)中的价值比较","authors":"Nami Yeyin, Mohammad Abuqbeitah, Aysel Namazova, Mustafa Demir","doi":"10.2174/0118744710333819250112153859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study intended to compare the radiation dose estimates to target and nontarget liver compartments from 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT and 90Y-PET/MR scans in liver tumors treated by 90Y-glass microspheres.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Dose estimation was performed for twenty-three eligible patients (13M, 10F) after 99mTc-MAA simulation using SPECT/CT imaging, and over 90Y-PET/MR images after 90Y-microsphere therapy. Simplicit90Y™ software was used for voxel-based dosimetry over the liver parenchyma. Dose estimates were obtained for whole healthy liver (HL), healthy injected liver (HIL), and tumor volumes. Pearson correlation, Bland-Altman plot, and Wilcoxon signed-ranks test were used for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean tumor dose was 270±111 Gy, the whole liver parenchyma dose was 26 ±12 Gy, and the healthy injected liver dose was 55±18 Gy from 99mTc-MAA simulation. 90YPET/ MR dosimetry yielded a mean tumor dose of 271±125 Gy, a HIL mean dose of 54±18 Gy, and a liver parenchyma dose of 25±12 Gy. An excellent agreement was demonstrated between tumor doses (R2=0.90) and liver doses (R2=0.87), while the agreement was less for HIL doses (R2=0.80). Wilcoxon signed-ranks test yielded no significant difference between the dose estimates for all liver compartments.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It was deduced that 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT simulation provides valuable dose prediction in 90Y-glass microsphere therapy. Despite the difference in volume measurements and dose estimates with 90Y-PET/MR, the predictive value of the 99mTc-MAA simulation was not affected.</p>","PeriodicalId":10991,"journal":{"name":"Current radiopharmaceuticals","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Estimation Value of 99mTc-MAA in Comparison with 90Y-PET/MR-based Dosimetry in Selective Internal Radiation Therapy (SIRT) for Liver Malignancies.\",\"authors\":\"Nami Yeyin, Mohammad Abuqbeitah, Aysel Namazova, Mustafa Demir\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/0118744710333819250112153859\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study intended to compare the radiation dose estimates to target and nontarget liver compartments from 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT and 90Y-PET/MR scans in liver tumors treated by 90Y-glass microspheres.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Dose estimation was performed for twenty-three eligible patients (13M, 10F) after 99mTc-MAA simulation using SPECT/CT imaging, and over 90Y-PET/MR images after 90Y-microsphere therapy. Simplicit90Y™ software was used for voxel-based dosimetry over the liver parenchyma. Dose estimates were obtained for whole healthy liver (HL), healthy injected liver (HIL), and tumor volumes. Pearson correlation, Bland-Altman plot, and Wilcoxon signed-ranks test were used for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean tumor dose was 270±111 Gy, the whole liver parenchyma dose was 26 ±12 Gy, and the healthy injected liver dose was 55±18 Gy from 99mTc-MAA simulation. 90YPET/ MR dosimetry yielded a mean tumor dose of 271±125 Gy, a HIL mean dose of 54±18 Gy, and a liver parenchyma dose of 25±12 Gy. An excellent agreement was demonstrated between tumor doses (R2=0.90) and liver doses (R2=0.87), while the agreement was less for HIL doses (R2=0.80). Wilcoxon signed-ranks test yielded no significant difference between the dose estimates for all liver compartments.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It was deduced that 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT simulation provides valuable dose prediction in 90Y-glass microsphere therapy. Despite the difference in volume measurements and dose estimates with 90Y-PET/MR, the predictive value of the 99mTc-MAA simulation was not affected.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10991,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current radiopharmaceuticals\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current radiopharmaceuticals\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/0118744710333819250112153859\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current radiopharmaceuticals","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0118744710333819250112153859","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Estimation Value of 99mTc-MAA in Comparison with 90Y-PET/MR-based Dosimetry in Selective Internal Radiation Therapy (SIRT) for Liver Malignancies.
Aim: This study intended to compare the radiation dose estimates to target and nontarget liver compartments from 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT and 90Y-PET/MR scans in liver tumors treated by 90Y-glass microspheres.
Material and methods: Dose estimation was performed for twenty-three eligible patients (13M, 10F) after 99mTc-MAA simulation using SPECT/CT imaging, and over 90Y-PET/MR images after 90Y-microsphere therapy. Simplicit90Y™ software was used for voxel-based dosimetry over the liver parenchyma. Dose estimates were obtained for whole healthy liver (HL), healthy injected liver (HIL), and tumor volumes. Pearson correlation, Bland-Altman plot, and Wilcoxon signed-ranks test were used for statistical analysis.
Results: The mean tumor dose was 270±111 Gy, the whole liver parenchyma dose was 26 ±12 Gy, and the healthy injected liver dose was 55±18 Gy from 99mTc-MAA simulation. 90YPET/ MR dosimetry yielded a mean tumor dose of 271±125 Gy, a HIL mean dose of 54±18 Gy, and a liver parenchyma dose of 25±12 Gy. An excellent agreement was demonstrated between tumor doses (R2=0.90) and liver doses (R2=0.87), while the agreement was less for HIL doses (R2=0.80). Wilcoxon signed-ranks test yielded no significant difference between the dose estimates for all liver compartments.
Conclusion: It was deduced that 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT simulation provides valuable dose prediction in 90Y-glass microsphere therapy. Despite the difference in volume measurements and dose estimates with 90Y-PET/MR, the predictive value of the 99mTc-MAA simulation was not affected.