在门诊和社区精神科环境中,当前临床杠杆的流行程度及其与感知胁迫的关联:一项加拿大的首次研究。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Arash Nakhost, Frank Sirotich, Alexander I F Simpson, Samuel Law
{"title":"在门诊和社区精神科环境中,当前临床杠杆的流行程度及其与感知胁迫的关联:一项加拿大的首次研究。","authors":"Arash Nakhost, Frank Sirotich, Alexander I F Simpson, Samuel Law","doi":"10.1007/s10597-024-01444-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clinical leverages and pressures are often utilized in psychiatric treatment settings. Clinicians know they are controversial but think of them as useful and relatively harmless. Perception of coercion is known to be deleterious to therapeutic relationship and clinical outcomes. We assessed individuals (N = 137) receiving care in outpatient and community psychiatric settings in a Canadian urban center regarding their current experiences of clinical leverage (in finance, housing, access to/custody of children, and family), and perception of coercion. Analyses show clinical leverage are common (34.8% overall), with access to child and family (15.7%), and financial (14.6%) leverages being most common. Generalised linear models indicated that psychiatric symptomology (p < 0.001) and current financial leverage (p = 0.035) were positively associated with perceptions of coercion. The results highlight that clinical leverages are widespread, associated with perception of coercion, and are likely harmful with negative impact on patient care and outcomes. Efforts to mitigate these impacts are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":10654,"journal":{"name":"Community Mental Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence of Current Clinical Leverage and Association with Perceived Coercion in Outpatient and Community Psychiatric Settings: A First in Canada Study.\",\"authors\":\"Arash Nakhost, Frank Sirotich, Alexander I F Simpson, Samuel Law\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10597-024-01444-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Clinical leverages and pressures are often utilized in psychiatric treatment settings. Clinicians know they are controversial but think of them as useful and relatively harmless. Perception of coercion is known to be deleterious to therapeutic relationship and clinical outcomes. We assessed individuals (N = 137) receiving care in outpatient and community psychiatric settings in a Canadian urban center regarding their current experiences of clinical leverage (in finance, housing, access to/custody of children, and family), and perception of coercion. Analyses show clinical leverage are common (34.8% overall), with access to child and family (15.7%), and financial (14.6%) leverages being most common. Generalised linear models indicated that psychiatric symptomology (p < 0.001) and current financial leverage (p = 0.035) were positively associated with perceptions of coercion. The results highlight that clinical leverages are widespread, associated with perception of coercion, and are likely harmful with negative impact on patient care and outcomes. Efforts to mitigate these impacts are needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10654,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Community Mental Health Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Community Mental Health Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-024-01444-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community Mental Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-024-01444-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

临床杠杆和压力通常用于精神治疗设置。临床医生知道它们是有争议的,但认为它们是有用的,相对无害的。众所周知,强迫的感知对治疗关系和临床结果是有害的。我们评估了在加拿大城市中心门诊和社区精神病院接受治疗的个体(N = 137),评估了他们目前的临床杠杆体验(在财务、住房、接触/监护儿童和家庭方面)以及对胁迫的感知。分析显示,临床杠杆很常见(34.8%),获得儿童和家庭(15.7%)和财务杠杆(14.6%)是最常见的。广义线性模型表明精神症状(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prevalence of Current Clinical Leverage and Association with Perceived Coercion in Outpatient and Community Psychiatric Settings: A First in Canada Study.

Clinical leverages and pressures are often utilized in psychiatric treatment settings. Clinicians know they are controversial but think of them as useful and relatively harmless. Perception of coercion is known to be deleterious to therapeutic relationship and clinical outcomes. We assessed individuals (N = 137) receiving care in outpatient and community psychiatric settings in a Canadian urban center regarding their current experiences of clinical leverage (in finance, housing, access to/custody of children, and family), and perception of coercion. Analyses show clinical leverage are common (34.8% overall), with access to child and family (15.7%), and financial (14.6%) leverages being most common. Generalised linear models indicated that psychiatric symptomology (p < 0.001) and current financial leverage (p = 0.035) were positively associated with perceptions of coercion. The results highlight that clinical leverages are widespread, associated with perception of coercion, and are likely harmful with negative impact on patient care and outcomes. Efforts to mitigate these impacts are needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
133
期刊介绍: Community Mental Health Journal focuses on the needs of people experiencing serious forms of psychological distress, as well as the structures established to address those needs. Areas of particular interest include critical examination of current paradigms of diagnosis and treatment, socio-structural determinants of mental health, social hierarchies within the public mental health systems, and the intersection of public mental health programs and social/racial justice and health equity. While this is the journal of the American Association for Community Psychiatry, we welcome manuscripts reflecting research from a range of disciplines on recovery-oriented services, public health policy, clinical delivery systems, advocacy, and emerging and innovative practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信